Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

nevertheless ... its a fast car  :D

Oh absolutely, but as DB said it is not simply a big engine in an otherwise standard Supra. It has had considerable development and investment in both time and money. :D

hmmm ..somehow i dont think that run is qutie "true"

Yeh... I'm with you Butler! Definately a fake. A bit like those UFO sighting vids ha!

:jk:

SK.. for us less fortunate could you translate that in english :D

Either way, that's very impressive. But I guess like most things technical, we will never know the secrets to that car.

Hi guys,

I read an article on on Fast fours, the article came out may 2004, but this supra made 7.7 @ 176mph and they're expecting 7.2 pass. There are lot of supras making that time ljstt mentioned in the US (msp supra 8.3 @168mph no nos, Titan supra 8.7 @169 mph Street tyre, mvp unibody supra 8.8 @167mph).

Don't be thinking this car is some backyard throw together (like my cars), it's been racing for a few years. The US has a larger and more advanced drag racing market, Titan proved how much quicker you can go with an auto on their car (dropped .3 seconds(?) from mid 8's to low 8's).

The turbo is going to be the dictator with regards to horsepower, I think this car is meant to have one of the Turbonetics Thumper's on it (up to 2,000hp).

Check out the engine bay of the Titan car, notice the Wiggins clamps on the water + turbo lines ($US200+ each). That's a fair bit more "advanced" than Mario's car....

Damn that is a BiG F'Off turbo - look at the size of the exhaust housing - it's nearly bigger than the compressor housing - that is TOP END power !

BFGoodrich Comp T/A's are radial tyres - specially constructed and in this case, large creasable sidewall....

AWESOME tyres.....  IMHO, they shit on Nittos.

Adrian

fair enough. im not doubting the cars potential just that using radial tyres a pass so fast just doesnt seem possible at this point. considering it took the HKS supra which uses biggggg drag slicks to get as far as it has, it seems hard to believe to see a supra with radial tyres runnin almost as fast

The fastest "street" car on drag radials is a twin turbo'd 7 liter 89 Camaro.. on a 295 sized tyre it did 7.66 @ 186 MPH.

There's been alot of development on drag radials in the last few years, M+H have a new range out that is meant to be the same compound rubber as the drag slick. The lineup goes from Nitto (hardest), BFG, M/T then M+H (softest).

The MSP supra was on BF's since they sponsor the import series there, the Camaro was on M/T tyres..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
    • Running rich in conditions where it shouldn't probably won't do great things for catalytic converter lifespan. I would fix that sooner than later.
×
×
  • Create New...