Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just got the LT12 in the rb30det.. goes great on 6 7 psi.. but cannot get anymore...

I have tried to open the bleed valve right up.. no more boost.. even tried a huge spring on the wastegate which made NO difference.

The turbo is a RX7 hitachi / t4 60ar combo.. it was making 17 18psi with the rb25...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53198-rb30det-can-only-run-7psi/
Share on other sites

A leak somewhere?  Maybe even on the hose to the boost gauge?

I wouldnt think so.. il have to check it out.. but even the map sensor is only reading 7psi on the microtech laptop software....

So the turbo is a VG30 turbo?

What power did it make on the dyno at 6-7psi?

With bleeders I've always experienced boost drop with anything above 2-2.5psi what the wastegate is. The only way I found to get around this was to either use an EBC with fuzzy logic (SBC-iD in Auto mode or an AVCR) or mod the actuators bolt up holes reducing its travel.

This makes 16psi on the RB20t without any form of bleeder/boost control, just the actuator its self.

If you look at the actuator's bracket that bolts on to the turbo there are a couple of bolt holes that secure it.

These are the holes I elongated so that I was able to 'tighten' up the wastegate.

Be carefull when adjusting it as boost will easily creep and shoot through the roof at high rpm if adjusted too much.

Turbo spec is

RX7 Series 4 or 5 core and rear wheel (huge wheel) cropped and machined into a VG30 single turbo .71 rear housing and the front is a Garret T04 6.0 ar front housing and wheel.

wouldnt the spring with shitloads of pressure do the same as tighten up the wastegate? if so we have tried that

wouldnt the spring with shitloads of pressure do the same as tighten up the wastegate? if so we have tried that

Well sort of.. but not really.. :rofl:

I have reduced the travel of the actuator/wastegate to the point where it doesn't open up fully. Hence it forces it to make the boost.

A spring is unable to do this UNLESS it is a 16psi spring and is strong enough to hold back the exhaust pressure in the exhaust housing.

To work out the exhaust pressure on the wastegate that the 16psi spring can hold before being forced open can only be worked out by the known and measuring the leverage, surface area of wastegate etc.

So.. by reducing its travel even if the pressure in the exhaust housing is too high and forces the wastegate open it won't be able to force it open any more as the actuator diaphram can only open so much. Understand what I'm talking about?

Because i am using a T04 front housing we had to make a custom mount for the waste gate actuator to bolt onto the front housing bolts that hold the compressor housing onto the backing plate.

I am not quite sure I understand what your sayin Joel but id like to give anything a try.. 12 psi on this thing would be animal :P

I built up a turbo years ago along the same lines as this (minus the cropped turbine) and used a Dash 24 TO4B comp wheel in the .60AR housing . The first impression was no or very little boost on a two liter FJ20ET . I then tried the middle sized RB25 exhaust housing (reprofiled) to excite it . This time round the dreaded surge set in . If I had these dramas with two liters you will have major mayhem with three . I would check the compressor wheel to see if it is eight bladed and if so ditch it for one of the six bladed versions . The VG30 exhaust housing is designed to work with a small diameter ceramic turbine so carving heaps out of these housings destroys most of the nozzle area , resulting in higher turbine inlet pressure and low turbine efficiency . Too late now but I'd have used the VG30 turbo standard , it was designed for three liters , and saved up for something better down the track . If you still have the std RB25 turbo and can get another std VG30 exhaust housing this combination is a reasonable stepping stone .

Cheers A .

I was under the impression that with small motors you are more likely to experience surge due to the engine not being able to consume the amount of air being forced in to it.

Larger motors = more air is able to be consumed especially at the critical low and mid range.

Hence the surge issues with the GCG Stage 2 500hp on the RB20DET..

That same turbo doesn't have any surge issues on the RB25DET..

yeah my car had bad surge with The CGC stage 2 high flow. Was quite dissapointed with the result really. Kinda got me nowhere. I had more power than stock turbo, but not as much as the boys who went full aftermarket. And these other 2 groups didn't have any surge problems.

the wastegate is closed fully now and it still makes the same amount of boost. (used welding wire)

the car makes nice power for 6psi... remember that the rb25 with exact same setup everywhere else could push over 17psi no problems...

500cc would not cause this.. i think i may have a boost leak

Does anyone know which GTBB CHRA goes into these GCG Hi Flows ? I suspect its one of the GT30 turbine based TO4S versions but have never seen one . If the compressor is seven bladed thats all I need to know .

Back to the RB30 , a GT30R I feel would have been a better choise than the 2835 giving more turbine and compressor flow and lots cheaper . Out of interest I went back to the Garrett PDF and looked up this turbo with the 1.06 exhaust housing and its flow rating (exhaust) is very similar to the GT35R/ .82AR combination . In big housing/s form this could be the go .

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Initial/early bite is a feature of.....generic pads. Things that work cold. Just put Bendix Ultimate in it. If you don't like them, it's only $3.50 wasted and an hour to change them. I've been using Intima SR, and they seem to be a good performance pad. Street friendly and able to take at least a little beating.
    • This is my first post after registering.. I hope i can find useful resources on this forum. Great forum. 
    • As I implied in my post, I have NO idea what the were. But in case I didn't make it clear, the way they performed was brilliant; whatever the brand was. I think it was the compound that made the difference. And if they were Bendix, then sign me up, I want another set. I did drive down mount Ousley (just outside of the Gong) a few times, and they showed no untowards performance.   Its not the low dust that I am looking for NOW. At the time I needed low dust, but now I have no issues with dust but want the initial/early bite of the pads that were used. Yeah, the early cold squeal may of been due to a missing shim or such.  And to repeat, its not the low dust I am seeking, its the initial bite of the pads and increase in bite as  the warmed up during each breaking. As soon as I let off, I don't remember the breaks being extra sticky if I used them again soon after. But I also did not test that theory.   Thanks for the recommendation, But I would prefer to choose something specifically with the behaviour I described.   I assume that they didn't use the default compound off the shelf, as we discussed the dust issue at length. And the early squeal when cold, I have seen the sound is more of an issue with some pad compounds. Mostly ceramic, which also are said to produce less dust.
    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
    • He'll be looking down and swearing about "the damn apprentice" for trying to convince Duncan to use percussive maintenance... 😛  
×
×
  • Create New...