Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

When looking at the imports I was asked if I wanted to look for a modified GTR or a stock (basically what I was looking for).

I said a clean, stock R32 GTR with a solid service history, etc. would be ideal.

What are the pros/cons of going with either? I had my reasons for going with a clean stock one but I'm curious as to what everyone is thinking and why.

- J.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53334-r32-gtr-buy-modded-or-stock/
Share on other sites

I thought that too...i wanted a stock GTR.....but then i realised, stuff that, i'll pay a lil extra and get a modded one. You can save money. But then again, you could be buying a lemon. Your choice really.

I bought a modified one and havnt looked back. I was lucky enough to have an ex aussie contact in japan who inspects the car before buying it. I also got all the reciepts from the workshop that did the mods, which told me exactly what was in the car and how much the previous owner spent. Maybe i was lucky?

I'd take the stock, because i don't want to miss the experience of modding youself and slowly feeling your car perform differently. I think that's part of the fun in buying an import

I think that i would appreciate it more as well. Just make sure your importing under the 15yr rule, otherwise youll be in for the big $$ when it comes to compliance time.

im also planning to import an R32 GTR with the use of the 15 year rule (if it still exists by the time i decide to import). I think a nice stock car with a complete and consistent service history is most important for me. Id rather have a car with medium k's done but with a full service history than a car with low k's but no logs at all, most brokers do decent checks about the condition of the cars to make sure they coincide with the k's shown but you can never be 100% accurate.

Get a nice stock example, if its in excellent condition with low logged k's its worth the extra couple of grand in my opinion.

Definitely go modded provided you get it checked out by a specialist. While it may be fun doing the mods yourself, you'll be digging deep into your pockets if you go down this track not to mention having your car off the road for a considerable period of time. I've just been down this route & if I had my time over again I would have bought a modded one & saved heaps of $$.

i got a stock one, mainly cos i couldn't afford anymore (oiginally going for a cefiro)

but if i did have the money, i think i would do the same because theres more chance of buying a lemon

but anyway i'll be able to say in about 5 days if it was a good idea or not cos thats when it lands (about bloody time).

slapperIf you go down this track not to mention having your car off the road for a considerable period of time. I've just been down this route & if I had my time over again I would have bought a modded one & saved heaps of $$.

Thats not as bad as being down the engine rebuild road :uhh:

I'd Go the stock GTR then you'll have a more reliable car and can save for modifications later. - Time of car off road maby a day or two getting a work shop doing it. - Lots of fun and you can learn lots if you do it your self.

Modified GTR as others have said you'r running the risk of getting a thrashed car and it going bang on you. - Time of car off road, New pistons and what ever else you want, at least 1 mth + but thats if you have the money ready to go. Other wise you'll be saving for a lot longer, you get the idea! (money wise you looking at around $4000min forged pistons + head gasket + oil + oil filters + machining, Balancing & labour etc. Now your back at square one with the same engine just stronger internals. - No fun in modifying and you dont get to feel the performance power gains as mentioned above.

But you could get lucky and get a genuine modified GTR. - You'll have a hard time finding a good condition 1989 mld R32. If anything I'd go 1994 mdl R32 :P

Your decision. :Party:

:P

Jun

Go the modified one. You'll find that most of the parts on an old performance car like a R32 GTR are old, frail, and break. At least one that modified properly will have these parts already replaced. But its hard to find that. I've spent a fair bit of money replacing old parts on my GTR and its money you'll never get back considering the resale and that people can't see through the price at a well prepared package.

I got mine for a lil bit more than a good stock example ($1K-$4K) but picked up about $14K+ worth of aftermarket parts:D go the mod's... unless you are really rich and want to spend about the same amount as the car on mod's (would most probably be much better when finished also)

This can also depend on what type of modifications you wish to do to the car or what you want the car to have, and what the car coms with.

If it comes with turbo upgrade, bigger fuel pump, aftermarket ecu, boosted lots etc. - Then its deffiently been thrashed.

If it comes with, Pod filters, Suspension, stock boost, Exhaust, Rims, BOV then it shouldn't be too bad won't be thrashed as much and internals wont have had as much ware.

:P

Jun

Thanks Ferni... :P I know we've talked about this one already... heh.

This can also depend on what type of modifications you wish to do to the car or what you want the car to have, and what the car coms with.

 

If it comes with turbo upgrade, bigger fuel pump, aftermarket ecu, boosted lots etc. - Then its deffiently been thrashed.

 

If it comes with, Pod filters, Suspension, stock boost, Exhaust, Rims, BOV then it shouldn't be too bad won't be thrashed as much and internals wont have had as much ware.

 

:(

Jun

I suppose at the end of the day it comes down to getting the car checked thoroughly. Most of the ones I was looking at have aftermarket pod filters, suspension, rims, the odd one has BOV, etc.etc.

A couple have got aftermarket computers and new turbos.... I'm steering clear of those that look like they've modified the turbos for the most part for that reason although I will inspect any GTR that looks reasonable. Cost is the number one prohibitve thing for me right now anyway.

- J.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
×
×
  • Create New...