Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's time to buy the wastegate for the GT35R, the motor's a RB30DET using a power fc and boost controller.

The GT35R has a 0.82 exh, it's rated at 700 hp.

I'm using a high mount SS exh manifold suited for an external wastegate.

WIll the 38mm gate be ok or should I be using a 45mm one? :boinkcar:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53393-which-wastegate-for-gt35r/
Share on other sites

It's time to buy the wastegate for the GT35R, the motor's a RB30DET using a power fc and boost controller.

The GT35R has a 0.82 exh, it's rated at 700 hp.

I'm using a high mount SS exh manifold suited for an external wastegate.

WIll the 38mm gate be ok or should I be using a 45mm one? :boinkcar:

Need to know a few more things before I can work out the wastegate size;

Is the engine capable of handling 700 bhp?

What boost level are you intending to run?

Will the engine handle that level of boost?

Need to know a few more things before I can work out the wastegate size

Engine hasn't been built yet but will be built to handle over 600hp.

Boost level would be no more than 25 psi, that's if it needs to go that high to achieve the power.

The engine is being built to withstand the psi and hp.

The bottom end will have forgies and after market rods, oringed block etc...

Engine hasn't been built yet but will be built to handle over 600hp.

Boost level would be no more than 25 psi, that's if it needs to go that high to achieve the power.

The engine is being built to withstand the psi and hp.

The bottom end will have forgies and after market rods, oringed block etc...

Hi Alf, sounds good, I will assume the turbo can be fully utilised;

700bhp / 11 X 19 / 25 = 48 mm

Hope that helps :P

Yes that helps alot Sydneykid, and thanks alot for your help.

The people who I have asked about this have suggested a turbosmart 45mm wastegate. So i guess there recommendations are very close to yours.

My exhaust manifold has 38mm piping for the wastegate, will this need to be replaced with 45/48mm piping?

Does anyone make a 48mm wastegate?

Thanks again. :wavey:

Yes that helps alot Sydneykid, and thanks alot for your help.

The people who I have asked about this have suggested a turbosmart 45mm wastegate. So i guess there recommendations are very close to yours.

My exhaust manifold has 38mm piping for the wastegate, will this need to be replaced with 45/48mm piping?

Does anyone make a 48mm wastegate?

Thanks again. :wavey:

Tial make 46 mm and 50 mm, HKS have 3 types of 50mm, Greddy have 2 types of 47 mm, Garrett have 46 mm and a few more that I can't remember.;)

Yes turbosmart's new pro-gate wastegates are now 48mm they use to be 45mm.

has anyone actually measured the valve area?

I think they are still 45mm, not 48. Going by what i saw.

But then, it might have been the old gate, in the new box :confused:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Initial/early bite is a feature of.....generic pads. Things that work cold. Just put Bendix Ultimate in it. If you don't like them, it's only $3.50 wasted and an hour to change them. I've been using Intima SR, and they seem to be a good performance pad. Street friendly and able to take at least a little beating.
    • This is my first post after registering.. I hope i can find useful resources on this forum. Great forum. 
    • As I implied in my post, I have NO idea what the were. But in case I didn't make it clear, the way they performed was brilliant; whatever the brand was. I think it was the compound that made the difference. And if they were Bendix, then sign me up, I want another set. I did drive down mount Ousley (just outside of the Gong) a few times, and they showed no untowards performance.   Its not the low dust that I am looking for NOW. At the time I needed low dust, but now I have no issues with dust but want the initial/early bite of the pads that were used. Yeah, the early cold squeal may of been due to a missing shim or such.  And to repeat, its not the low dust I am seeking, its the initial bite of the pads and increase in bite as  the warmed up during each breaking. As soon as I let off, I don't remember the breaks being extra sticky if I used them again soon after. But I also did not test that theory.   Thanks for the recommendation, But I would prefer to choose something specifically with the behaviour I described.   I assume that they didn't use the default compound off the shelf, as we discussed the dust issue at length. And the early squeal when cold, I have seen the sound is more of an issue with some pad compounds. Mostly ceramic, which also are said to produce less dust.
    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
    • He'll be looking down and swearing about "the damn apprentice" for trying to convince Duncan to use percussive maintenance... 😛  
×
×
  • Create New...