Jump to content
SAU Community

Had a run with a GTIR!


drewecrome
 Share

Recommended Posts

LMAO at all those talking about beating GTiR's in their whales..

Please...!!!

and a prelude keeping up? pull the other one..!!

not many of their owners are willing to do 7000rpm launches..

2 weeks ago at WSID, there was a little black one with 15 inch wheels, pod filter and turbo back exhaust.

boost was up from 10.5psi to about 11.5psi with the intake and exhaust done..

with a nice launch.. (as in no dumps.. just slip the clutch a little and release when it gets moving), and crappy 60' times, he was running 13.5 all night..

let's remember that 1 second difference in a 1/4 mile race is about what? 3 or 4 car lengths?

4 R33 gtst's were there last night and I knew 3 of them..

1 with semi slicks and about 200rwkw ran a best of 13.4

the other with a little less power and street tyres but completely striped interior ran a 13.4

the last one which had cat back and a pod filter and 17's ran 15 flat.

the 4th I didn't know had fullsick leather interior and stereo stuff and was running high 14's..

So i call "BULLSHIT" to all of you saying you beat or kept up with a GTiR unless...

*you have over 200rwkw

*lightened car

*or the GTiR had issues..

It all makes sense to me.

My GTI-R ran 13.4 @100 mph with a soft-ish launch and only 140 kw at all four (1.8 sec 60ft, with hard launch should be 1.6). Any drag racer will tell you that every tenth you shave in the first 60ft will yeild two tenths off your et. It now makes 156kw at all four and is quite a bit faster in the top end.

Like I said to the guys with the GTSTs getting all worked up, don't feel so bad, GTI-Rs were constructed as a race car, and to me an R33 GTST is a nicer car, just slower in stock or lightly modded form.

And remember, any car/driver combo can beat anyone on the right day with the right circumstances. So don't get all worked up, who cares?

Just enjoy your car, and forget about rubbishing other peoples chosen ride. For the record I own both a GTI-R and a Skyline GTR and I know which one I'll be keeping.

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pulsar GTiR SR20-DET 1998cc I4 turbo 172kW 284Nm 1220kg 5.89

Skyline GTS25t (R33) RB25-DET 2498cc I6 turbo 184kW 274Nm 1370kg 6.21

ok so in standard form pulsar has tad less more power, more torque, and over 100kg less weight. Its easy to see that they are going to be faster when comparing stock cars..

Not that i really care, i would like to hear a bit more about this NA prelude that keeps up with GTI-R's!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats it richard.

Pulsar GTiR SR20-DET 1998cc I4 turbo 172kW 284Nm 1220kg 0-100 5.89sec

Skyline GTS25t (R33) RB25-DET 2498cc I6 turbo 184kW 274Nm 1370kg 0-100 6.21sec

ok so in standard form pulsar has tad less more power, more torque, and over 100kg less weight. Its easy to see that they are going to be faster when comparing stock cars..

Not that i really care, i would like to hear a bit more about this NA prelude that keeps up with GTI-R's!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

btw i dont consider R33's the whales that a lot of people do, especially when you look at the 1700kg-plus weight of a lot of new performance cars coming out. A soarer however might be considered a whale, but are still damn quick once on the move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GTiRs are quick packages, stock and especially modified, mine was stock but still quite the performer, handling wasn't what I enjoyed tho, sold it for something more RWD biased (GTR)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My GTiR ran 12.72 with an exhaust upgrade.

Yeah, a 12.7 .... at 80mph

GTIRs get great quarter mile times, but the trap speeds are usually fairy low. They may get up and boogey, but have no staying power.

Our skyline got the same trap speed down the quarter as a GTIR which was 2 seconds faster over 400m :P :whip:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats it richard.

Pulsar GTiR SR20-DET 1998cc I4 turbo 172kW 284Nm 1220kg 0-100 5.89sec  

Skyline GTS25t (R33) RB25-DET 2498cc I6 turbo 184kW 274Nm 1370kg 0-100 6.21sec  

ok so in standard form pulsar has tad less more power, more torque, and over 100kg less weight.  Its easy to see that they are going to be faster when comparing stock cars..

Not that i really care, i would like to hear a bit more about this NA prelude that keeps up with GTI-R's!

Hahaha, I partly said it to stir the pot - threads like this usually come up from people making assumptions etc. People will bag Skylines etc when they own GTiRs, and vice versa with Skylines bagging GTiRs - there are (like in any instance) too many variables and types of comparisons to rule one car over an other.

In a drag situation, an equivalent GTiR should beat a non-GTR Skyline... simple as that, it basically comes down to torque/power/weight and the level of traction. However - in say a 100kph roll on (no sanctioned event I know of does this, however :P But...) an equivalent GTiR and R33 GTS25t might look a little bit different to how the 1/4 mile drag happened. But then there is always the stand out equivalent of either car.

Anyway, despite the pot stirring - I don't take back what I said about my old Prelude... I moved on because you hit a brick wall pretty quickly with an NA 4cyl, unless you are going to spend massive amounts of money - and FWDs are just boring - but a good power to weight ratio with no lag to deal with and a good torque delivery counts for a lot :D Its highest dyno run was 146fwkw - if 2 cars have similar power, and similar weight, why wouldn't they accelerate at a similar rate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ive seen type-r preludes with fully built motors, head work, cams etc, and only make 100fwkw. What did you do to yours?! Unless yours is the 1980's angular shaped one i remember seeing in a mag that had a motor that could rev to 10,000rpm or so the owner claimed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think people are forgetting that the driver has one of the biggest parts to play in racing whether it be proper drag racing on a strip or the traffic lights drag (where people always exaggerate or complain that something wasn't right).

Some people take their cars to the limit and know what to do and when and some are cautious...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got one in the workshop with 450 at the wheels, used once a year of lucky,

They ran a flat 12 with 2 in the car and the A/C running andnot sure if it was the best launch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your also all forgetting about the spastic amounts of grip the GTIR has over the enormous RWD whale.. Lets not talk about twisty roads!!!!

I have smoked r33 after r33 after r33 in the gtir.

We're comparing two very different cars, and anyone who thinks their r33 has a chance against one is a dreamer unless $8k+ has been spent on go fast bits.

I currently own a GTIR and to be honest, I prefer the riding position of the Skylines and prefer RWD. (you cant do skids in a GTIR.)

Lets all keep it real though :P

ps. my gtir is for sale if anyones interested.. $16.9k ono - pm me you know you wanna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's some very quick GTiR's up the sunny coast, a Sub-Zero built one I ' think '. I've seen that car go and I would not want to race it in my skyline, because I know I would get my ass handed to me on a silver platter, and then some. They're little pocket rockets, my mate has a 10 sec rotary and he said he's raced that particular GTiR and narrowly beat it. Food for thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ive seen type-r preludes with fully built motors, head work, cams etc, and only make 100fwkw.  What did you do to yours?!  Unless yours is the 1980's angular shaped one i remember seeing in a mag that had a motor that could rev to 10,000rpm or so the owner claimed...

There is no such thing as a Type-R Prelude.... so there is part of the problem there. Anyway, I'm only talking basically modded GTiRs as well - as I said early in the thread SR20DETs are very good motors so obviously they can go far, and I moved on because it was just going to cost too much to get so far. It was a lot of fun having an NA car that people who didn't do their homework would underestimate, and this is the same reason I bought an R33 GTS25t - in NZ they are VERY underestimated because basically hardly anyone have worked out what makes them go. Over here the general consensus is there is no comparison between a RB20DET powered R32 GTSt and a RB25DET powered GTS25t, so what you have come to understand about things isn't necessarily all that is right.

Obviously Skyline fans are going to know more about fast Skylines, and how to make them quick as that is what they are into, ditto with GTiR fans, and ditto with Honda fans. So really wouldn't people in a Skyline forum probably not be the most certified to say what a 2.2VTEC motor can do, or what a GTiR can do if they haven't actually researched and modified them? I guy I know was running 12s with just front mounted stock intercooler, exhaust and boost - but his trap speeds were still not much over 100mph. Doing 60ft times in the 1.7s helps things along nicely.

The basic point I'm making, is yep - *A* Skyline GTS25t has beaten *A* GTiR, doesn't mean all 25ts will beat all GTiRs, and vice versa. Same as *A* NA Prelude has beaten *A* GTS25t, but then the owner of that Prelude went and upgraded to a GTS25t.... also food for thought?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a GTiR and a GTR and find the GTiR a lot more fun to drive than the GTR and any one that thinks GTiRs dont handle mine set the lap record at WAs fastest hill climb.

Just wish the gearboxes wernt so weak.

Wow.

List mods to GTiR and GTR?

This is no stock GTiR though is it.. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a GTiR and a GTR and find the GTiR a lot more fun to drive than the GTR and any one that thinks GTiRs dont handle mine set the lap record at WAs fastest hill climb.

Just wish the gearboxes wernt so weak.

I say they dont handle....sure you can get anything to handle after modding it....but out of the box,im sorry....they dont handle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hang on...i have an old issue of Zoom with a bunch of WA GTiRs...im guessing Steves is one of them...cant be too many Dakars getting around.

If i could get 20k for my R32 GTST there is a GTiR id love to buy. AP brakes 450hp at the wheels, holinger box, bucket loads on susp, lexan windows, gutted with cage with Vic rego... and best of all a fastidious owner who has spent money on making sure its bolted together properly. Its a circuit car but whgen they ran it down the qtr it still did a low 12:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • this explains the possibility of several maps with different boost levels
    • ok, I understand much better how we can control the boost and increase the number of psi before opening the wastegate
    • Well.... yes and perhaps no. It depends on what you mean by "spool". For most of us, the point that we would describe as where the turbo is "spooling" is the point where the wheel speed gets high enough for it to start making some boost. This is coincidentally around about the point where it starts making noise - hence the "spooling" sound. If that is what you mean, then no - the wastegate should still be shut at this point. The boost will still be way below the point where it should start opening. If, on the other hand, you mean "spool" as "reach full boost", then yes. At the point where the boost has reached target, then boost control has already started. The wastegate is already open, and has been for some time. Some short time, definitely, but still, some time. If you have no boost controller - just the wastegate actuator connected to the boost source, then you have a mechanical system working as a pressure balance. There is pressure on one side of the wastegate actuator's diaphragm from the spring, and pressure on the other side coming from the boost measurement location (the "source"). This is not a digital thing. The wastegate does not stay shut until the boost pressure reaches the spring "pressure". The spring will start to compress as soon as you start to apply any pressure onto it. This can be controlled somewhat by adding pre-load into the spring, but you cannot add enough preload to make it into a digital switch behaviour. The wastegate will crack open and start to leak exhaust out (and therefore not though the turbine) well before you reach the target boost pressure. Electronic (and some mechanical/pneumatic) boost controllers will act to prevent the boost source applying pressure to the actuator until just before you reach target boost, thus preventing the wastegate from creeping open. And some boost controllers will apply boost pressure on the spring side to further push it shut. And this can be be necessary because the exhaust pressure in the manifold also pushes on the wastegate valve and tries to open it and you cab get it leaking even without it being connected to the boost source.
    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
    • I recently discovered that I could not remove the outer bolt on one of my rear UCAs. Looked like it was seized to the crush tube. It wasn't all that long since I had last had that arm out (I dunno exactly, but certainly <2 yrs), so I was a bit surprised. I thought I had stock bushes in the rear knuckles, so I ordered some new PU bushes and resigned myself to having to do some dismantlery....and some butchery. It was clear that the seized bush was going to need to have the bolt cut out of it and then possibly some more brutality after that. Upon getting the 3x arms on each side disconnected from the knuckles (with the exception of the seized one, of course), I discovered that I had in fact put PU bushes into the knuckles when I did the subframe conversion about 12-13 years ago. So, I say "Oh, good, I might not have to swap any of these others out". We set to work butchering the bolt out of the seized arm. Stainless blade in a big-arse Milwaukee recipro made short work of it, and also damaged the arm, which added a welding and grinding and painting step to the whole exercise. During the butchery it became clear that the bolt was not just seized but bent. Head scratching ensued, as it is hard to understand how that bolt could get bent. I did suffer a broken (stock) toe control arm on that side a few months ago, and drove some miles with some significant rear wheel self steer and lack of control, which probably was the cause. But it's still hard to understand how it would bend that bolt, rather than just bend the arm. But here's the start of the real discoveries. The crush tube was rusty as all shit. I mean seriously rusty. A little on the inside, contributing to the tube seizing to the bolt (along with the bend). But the outside had at least 2-3mm of compressed flaky iron oxide jammed in between the parent metal and the PU bush. This one was brutalised and still took some effort to get the PU off the crush tube. So I thought I'd inspect the others more closely. The one on the tension rod adjacent the bent one was first. I had to use a 2-jaw puller to get the crush tube out, and it took some effort. It came out looking like the first one. All 6 of them were the same, except for one that looked not too bad. Had some corrosion on it, but was mostly OK. There was also a significant amount of corrosion on the inner surfaces of the knuckles. They took some convincing with pointy tools to let go their grip on the inside of the holes they were in. There was no sign of the original (SuperPro) lube anywhere. I and my bro-in-law have never seen any crush tube end up looking like this. It was seriously like the car has spent time putting boats into the water at the boat ramp. So, it seems like the PU might have been bonded to the steel on both sides, which would have to make them work more like stock rubber bushes (where arm deflection results in twist inside the rubber). Despite this, I have never had cause to believe that they were so tightly bound up. The suspension moved up and down much as you'd expect. The car never made any noises in those bushes that would have led me to believe there was a problem. Maybe the rusty interfaces actually were "sliding". Anyway, lesson learnt. Even quiet, non-troublesome PU bushes should be inspected every now and then!
×
×
  • Create New...