Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Kabab,

Yeah it's been a while since that dyno day hey! Thanks mate :P

Yeah like I posted above, AFAIK they're still stock!? It's "possible" to flow @ least 400hp with them on stock fuel pressure. So with a fair whack of additional pressure it "should" be possible.

I remember using some basic injector sizing calc's that showed the stock 370cc'ers "can" flow enough for ~420hp @ 100% DC, then add the extra pressure on top.

Ahh here it is - A post I made on SDU a while back (contains a quote from Martin) -

"Injector sizing is quite a simple rule of thumb. Divide the injector size (in CC) by 5.2 then multiply it by the # of cylinders. This gives you a 90% duty cycle figure for 40psi of fuel pressure."

So given the stock GTS25t injectors are 370CC / 5.2 X 6 = 426.9HP @ the crank on 40psi fuel press'. Add an adjustable fuel pressure reg & Bosch 600HP pump, bump up the fuel pressure to 50-55+psi, & you've got potential for 400+HP & duty cycle to spare.

Now bump the pressure to 60-65+psi & so on & so on....

The big factor in most cases is the fuel pump isn't able to maintain pressure under the extra load.

The Gibson Motorsport GRP A GT-R's ran up to 138psi fuel pressure through Nismo 550's!!! . They used a very impressive supply system to cope (twin systems + a mechanical pump).

Guest MFX_R33

I have a similar problem with tune at the moment. Every time I take off I leave the opposition in a cloud of black smoke (I still leave them though). The car is running way too rich and is staining my rear bar.

I think with some more tuning and knocking down the A/F R I can see some more power.

As far as injectors go I am running 205rwkw with stock injectors AND stock pressure, and the are still coping (if not close to 100%).

Be good to see how you go on the track (I see you have a similar theory to me, run it on the track as it is on the street).

Jeff.

Good good good! :P

From the sounds of that then, I should be right with my 550's anyways :D

matt

Originally posted by whatsisname

Kabab,

           Yeah it's been a while since that dyno day hey! Thanks mate :D

Yeah like I posted above, AFAIK they're still stock!?  It's "possible" to flow @ least 400hp with them on stock fuel pressure. So with a fair whack of additional pressure it "should" be possible.  

I remember using some basic injector sizing calc's that showed the stock 370cc'ers "can" flow enough for ~420hp @ 100% DC, then add the extra pressure on top.  

Ahh here it is -  A post I made on SDU a while back (contains a quote from Martin) -

"Injector sizing is quite a simple rule of thumb. Divide the injector size (in CC) by 5.2 then multiply it by the # of cylinders. This gives you a 90% duty cycle figure for 40psi of fuel pressure."  

So given the stock GTS25t injectors are 370CC / 5.2 X 6 = 426.9HP @ the crank on 40psi fuel press'. Add an adjustable fuel pressure reg & Bosch 600HP pump, bump up the fuel pressure to 50-55+psi, & you've got potential for 400+HP & duty cycle to spare.

Now bump the pressure to 60-65+psi & so on & so on....  

The big factor in most cases is the fuel pump isn't able to maintain pressure under the extra load.  

The Gibson Motorsport GRP A GT-R's ran up to 138psi fuel pressure through Nismo 550's!!! . They used a very impressive supply system to cope (twin systems + a mechanical pump).

Jeff,

We had a good old chat @ this years Adelaide Autosalon :wavey: Once you've got your tuning sorted you'll be laughing. You've got all the hardware, its just power there for the taking! It's also one very nice looking car mate!

I'm all for quick (drag) times, records made to be broken & so on, but I like the idea of knowing what a car can do as is, all day, every day. AIR is set to start street meets this coming weekend (Nov 2-3) but the Extreme Horsepower show is on so I'll wait till a later meet.

Matt,

See how you go with the 550's mate, if they can flow the horsepower safely your laughing :D It’s nice to have the extra capacity in reserve though I guess.

:P

Originally posted by whatsisname

Rev',

        I wish I knew the exact specs mate!  I need to see if Vince can recall what specs he requested from PT?  

:lol:  - Ah yes the old cement in the boot trick!

How much did it end up costing for the turbo?

I appreciate its got the T3 flange but was it a straight bolt on?

cheers

:)

From memory it was ~$1900 plain bearing (well over 2k BB!) Yeah mate it's a straight bolt-on, but it's a very tight fit! They actually had to grind a small area to ensure clearance on the manifold.

My turbo is the only area I wish I'd gathered more info on :) At the time I just asked for a turbo that could make good power without huge boost levels. I was prepared to accept a little extra lag to keep the cost down.

When Vince showed me the size difference btw my old turbo & the new one (total size & wheel/housing size) the new one was quite a bit larger. Certainly larger than a high flowed standard turbo. No chance of the original heat shield fitting back on :)

Sim,

G'day mate! Ya' can never have too much ;)

A ride in the pram spins out the new addition so she must be blown away by a ride in Skyline! :lol:

I'll drop you a line no prob's mate. As you'd know I don't go on ICQ @ all these days, it stuffed up & I've been too lazy to suss it out ;)

HKS GT3040 @ 2.0bar "Holy smokes Batman":eek:

Azlan,

No mate the BOV replacement wasn't to improve performance. Hmmm, actually it was & it wasn't.

My stock BOV never leaked (@ 13-14psi it shouldn't either!) but it did have trouble discharging the pressure on closed throttle. In short it wasn't able to dump all the air & therefore caused compressor surge. So on went the GFB "Basic", which actually flows 93.6 CFM compared to the Mach 1/Plumb Back - 54.5, Hybrid/Bovus Maximus - 80.1 & the Mach 2 - 53.3. The Basic is the quietest of this bunch too, less restriction ='s less psshhhhhht (something I prefer). It's also the cheapest! My guess is noise levels sell BOV's :P

The fact that it's a vent to atmo BOV is only due to it's superior flow capabilities, & having a MAP based ECU. Defectable for sure but then so are lots of things!

Unless the factory BOV isn't doing its job then I can't see any performance gain in replacing it. It was working fine in my case, it just couldn't dump enough air.

:)

Matt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...