Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ha guys,

Just got back from drag wars at the motorplex ,i took my gtr up for a run to see how it would good. Its running 320hp ball bearing garett turbos, tomei cams and cam wheels,rb 20 air flow ,700cc sard injectors and apexi power fc which has put out about 518hp at the wheels at 18psi but as been tapered back a little to about 500hp. The rest is all std.

So my second trip to a drag strip every in any car i managed a

elaped time 11.332sec

terminal speed 125.17mph 201.44kph

60" 1.757

330" 4.873

660" 7.391

1000" 9.524

I felt pretty happy with this as i was having a hard time great a nice lauch two much wheel spinning and a bit of shuddering but managed consistent 1.7 60" times,is this a reasonable time for wot im running as im very new the drag strip screen as the car was aim more for track day work

p.s any advice on getting good launches

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53732-1133sec-standard-internal-gtr/
Share on other sites

Ha guys,  

             Just got back from drag wars at the motorplex ,i took my gtr up for a run to see how it would good. Its running 320hp ball bearing garett turbos, tomei cams and cam wheels,rb 20 air flow ,700cc sard injectors and apexi power fc which has put out about 518hp at the wheels at 18psi but as been tapered back a little to about 500hp. The rest is all std.  

             So my second trip to a drag strip every in any car i managed a  

elaped time                  11.332sec

terminal speed             125.17mph     201.44kph

60"                                1.757

330"                              4.873

660"                              7.391

1000"                            9.524

I felt pretty happy with this as i was having a hard time great a nice lauch two much wheel spinning and a bit of shuddering but managed consistent 1.7 60" times,is this a reasonable time for wot im running as im very new the drag strip screen as the car was aim more for track day work

p.s any advice on getting good launches

Launch style depends on what tyres, clutch and suspension you are running:cheers

Launch style depends on what tyres, clutch and suspension you are running:cheers

clutch is a multiplate unknown brand

tyres are zr275/35/18 nittos not the r styles they use in japan

suspension std shocks and slighty lower heavy springs at best guess

ps i got a feeling one of the rear shocks could be a bit dicky (will be checking condition soon)

Good to see Peter, I assume you got George in Bunbury to finish off the tune and continue development.

1.7 is quite good for a road spec GTR running road tyres. Anything less than that will probably require extreme clutch abuse on your setup.

Cheers

Ken

Good to see Peter, I assume you got George in Bunbury to finish off the tune and continue development.

1.7 is quite good for a road spec GTR running road tyres. Anything less than that will probably require extreme clutch abuse on your setup.

Cheers

Ken

Ha Ken,

We did the tune at georges but i did the number crunching and cam adjustment george drove and between us we got to where we are now the tomei cam are awesome we pick up over a 100 hp just tuning them believe it or not and i am hoping to out it back on dyno soon to do further tuning but this time not for top end but for refining the rest of the map to best posible throddle responce and feel ,not that there anything wrong with it at the moment .

Ken how the gtr you got from over east going done much with it .

question for you ken i was talking with anthony i think a nice little asia guy with a r32 gtr works for sst (not 680hp anthony) he has done a single throddle body convestion on the gtr and says it improve throddle responce for him ,wot you think of the idea

Pete

Ha Ken,

           We did the tune at georges but i did the number crunching and cam adjustment george drove and between us we got to where we are now the tomei cam are awesome we pick up over a 100 hp just tuning them believe it or not and i am hoping to out it back on dyno soon to do further tuning but this time not for top end but for refining the rest of the map to best posible throddle responce and feel ,not that there anything wrong with it at the moment .

           Ken how the gtr you got from over east going done much with it .

           question for you ken i was talking with anthony i think a nice little asia guy with a r32 gtr works for sst (not 680hp anthony) he has done a single throddle body convestion on the gtr and says it improve throddle responce for him ,wot you think of the idea

Pete

If you dont mind me asking, what profile are your cams and what revs are you making max power at?

Gilly

My GTR is sold to David( Bobbo) on this forum .

The guys name is Aidwin and each to there own on the conversion.

Really can't see how individual throttle plates right next to the valve are going to give a better , crisper response than one big right at one end of the manifold...

Was it done as a mod by itself or in conjunction with a few other mods at the same time?

Cheers

Ken

If you dont mind me asking, what profile are your cams and what revs are you making max power at?

Gilly

tomei 260 9.15mm lift poncams they bolt staight in awesome cams for street and track use puts just a nice lump edge on idol (just slight) and makes 1600 plus trackable effort from at about 4600 and holds that right throught to about 7500

Was done by its self still running stock AFMs and air box, The car is so much more drivable and smoother at part throttle with out all the turbulance the 6 butterflys and shafts cause

with a nice power gain everywere. Next is remove the airboxes and meters and lots of dyno time.

12.2 with stock airboxes and turbos (1bar) and old worn stock motor with a novice driver is not bad.

Aidwin is one off SSTs apprentices and is logging every step me makes with this car and only making one change at a time.

My GTR is sold to David( Bobbo) on this forum .

The guys name is Aidwin and each to there own on the conversion.

Really can't see how individual throttle plates right next to the valve are going to give a better , crisper response than one big right at one end of the manifold...

Was it done as a mod by itself or in conjunction with a few other mods at the same time?

Cheers

Ken

Yeah sorry i am hopeless with names ,so wot are you driving now as the r32 gtr looked like a great buy and on the throddle body if he did anything else i'm not 100% sure but my only train of thinking was that went throddle shuts you pull a vacuvm on a much large volume so when it open your got it would pull the inishal shot very quickly over the very small volume of the std throddle body("maybe" only a thought i had last night when were talking). Anybody else tried this sort of mod out of interest.

Was done by its self still running stock AFMs and air box, The car is so much more drivable and smoother at part throttle with out all the turbulance the 6 butterflys and shafts cause

with a nice power gain everywere. Next is remove the airboxes and meters and lots of dyno time.

12.2 with stock airboxes and turbos (1bar) and old worn stock motor with a novice driver is not bad.

Aidwin is one off SSTs apprentices and is logging every step me makes with this car and only making one change at a time.

ha steve,

novice driver i hope you didnt tell aidwin that hehe as he look to hard him self like a pro(top guy) ,i'm not sure if i'm aloud to ask this on here but wot the mod ~worth to get done as i enjoy track days etc and anything to help throddle responce is a good thing.Wot you think of the 11.33 steve running wot i am, like aidwin i battle for traction all night and i have only ever been on the strip once before.(if anyone novice its me lol)

518hprw = ~390kwrw

i think yes once you break into the tens cage and andra licence but if you ran one 10.99 i dont think they would be all over you ,more if you ran consist or depther into 10s or a high mph i think

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...