Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I got my car dynoed on friday and got 176.8kW on a DD in shootout mode.

Personally, I think that's pretty good considering my car is dead stock except for exhaust although I know dyno readings can be misleading.

Anyway, I just wanted to compare with others out there with a similarly stock car.

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53774-got-my-r33-dynoed-comparisons/
Share on other sites

Hmm it does seem high, but it was in shootout mode, and on a fairly warm day.

The reason I don't doubt the integrity is because it was done purely for diagnosis of a problem rather than the installation of any performance bits so theres no reason for them make it read higher.

The other thing could be unknown mods to my car, but it looks stock as in the engine bay and interior...

That is a little high for just an exhaust.

I just got my dead stock 4door r33 tested on the dyno and it produced 135kw at the treads (which is normal 4 an r33 gtst)

If you don't see any mods in your engine bay it could be possible you have a retuned ecu such as.. Mines etc.

wow... those figures seem too good for those mods. would you know if other cars on that dyno also getting high results??

Well it was at TM autosports at Tuggerah which has done dynos of FLYBYE and also that orange autostyle 200ZR (i think it was that one, with 441rwkw). Also, my brothers car ran about the same as me and he has a worked 308...

Well I have just dynoed my R32 GTR on a DD Dyno and got 188kw @ wheels at 14psi 6000rpm. [/u] Mods for power include: Steel turbine and larger comp wheel (mild upgade) on GTR turboes, Tomei cams 260/260 and a trust intercooler. Forget all the support systems for now blah blah blah :P

I was in shootout 6 mode with atmo compensation "on" and correctly setup (thank you dick smith weather station)

At this level of mods my air flow meters are reading 5.1V at 6000rpm and I have major boost creep due to the turbine side and/or waste gate being to small. Boost although set at 14psi creeps up to 18psi by 6000rpm so I don't rev it any further than that.

I continually find it amazing, as I was the dyno operator on my own car, how people seem to get 200+ kw on near standard turboes and seem to suffer non of the above problems?>? The engine is in good condition with no air leaks and has good support systems in place.

Mike

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Shove more foam in it as a minimum if you possibly can. Or steel wool (not the stuff with soap on it!) Baffles / getting the oil out of the air is huge, and should be done at both the cam cover, and the catch can.   I'm about to do a power steering reservoir, and even that needs some thought to make sure air is separated from the oil, to stop evil Cavitation. I'll probably look at doing my own catchcan later on too.
    • I was once told, who it was I'm to old to remember, that the length of the OEM wheels brace supplied with a vehicle is designed long enough for a average person to apply enough torque to do up, and undo the wheel nuts to the specified torque  What a average person is is anyone's guess though, i.e. average fat bastard, average knuckle head, average perfect sized human......like me Unless of course, a tyre shop has ugga dugga'd them up to "torque to yeild/strip" specs, used cross threading as natures lock tight, or a big breaker bar was used to tighten them up to get some nice stretch in the poor old wheel studs Me, I torque wheel nuts to 1 elbow joint click, lower torque settings are based of wrist clicks, higher torque settings are based of shoulder clunks, or total dislocation for anything that requires all of the torques 
    • I think the catch can design is pretty flawed. Evident in the fact that the V2 one moved to a larger top mounted filter which alone would have helped with overflow and reduce restrictions compared with the side filter. I also imagine there was a major improvement to the baffling design. It is worth mentioning that this catch can with the RB20 was never as much of an issue and the high kms RB25 is likely a part of the problem. I have gotten quotes for both a new "Vibrant Gen 3" catch can and to modify this existing ones but that may have to wait until after the track day. I hope the sump/head breathers/drains and cam splash plates will be enough
    • Yep, both. The ratio is 1.8 instead of OEM being 1.7. The rocker bodies are modified with a larger bolt hole and re-threaded with 10mm holes instead of the 8mm YT has stock. Finding out they don't actually fit the stock castings cause a lot of un-impressment by the person in the USA who tapped the new holes for the 'upgraded' YT product. He was very unhappy with them given their previous design did not require 'clearancing'
    • That too, but I think this is why she's put the work into the cam cover baffles. I mean, a catch can should only need to be a catch can, not an oil air separator also. Not to say that putting the effort into having it do a better job of oil-air sep is a waste of time, but doing the sep earlier is always going to make life better. And that should happen now anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...