Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's quite possible that the 'custom' plenum is just a step backwards from the stock one. Is it just the plenum, or a whole new intake manifold (inc. runners)?

I've seen some pretty poor looking custom plenums on RB25s and I'm sure some of them would have been a step backwards from the stock one.

Richard

It's quite possible that the 'custom' plenum is just a step backwards from the stock one. Is it just the plenum, or a whole new intake manifold (inc. runners)?

I've seen some pretty poor looking custom plenums on RB25s and I'm sure some of them would have been a step backwards from the stock one.

Richard

Its the whole nine yards, and fundementally looks fantastic, a pic is attached of it

Just not sure if the exahust cam timing adjustment is holding the whole thing back or not, or what exactly is casuing the problem

yeah, he has already been contacted etc

I am sure I read somewhere about someone putting on a Greddy and a custom plenum and having to drop back the amount of advance/retard on there adjustable cam gears

Just trying to find out who it was.........

Chris

Its the whole nine yards, and fundementally looks fantastic, a pic is attached of it

Just not sure if the exahust cam timing adjustment is holding the whole thing back or not, or what exactly is casuing the problem

Yeah, I agree that plenum looks nice. I think a little research is in order to find out why you guys went backwards with it.

Richard

G'day all,

posting as a question for a mate who is having a few probs -

Custom plenum installed and the car has gone backwards in power quite a bit, I read somewhere the other day (cant remember where, I read so much) that guys who have put Greddy/custom plenums and who have had adjustable cam wheels had to adjust these to suit the new plenum and airflow charactersitcs

ie they have been set up with tha standard plenum etc, and have had to be changed quite considerably to get a good result

Currently the exahust cam wheel is retarded 4 degree's (from memory) - engine is a RB25, which was making around 270rwkw on the stock plenum

Can anyone help or suggest what the problem may be  

Chris

I used to race karts. Way back when I had a fairly fast DAP T75.... Anyhow one night it was going stong (as they do when lean) and it put the rod through the bottom of the crank cases.

A guy came to me in the pits and offered the price of a new engine for the barrell and head.

We did the deal and by Wednesday he was on the phone "I just measured this barrell and it is Stock!!!"

"I know mate,"I replied" dont, stuff with it. The next meeting I blew him off down the shute.... "WTF I said??... "Oh I just fixed up the ports he said....

Lesson for me... Unless you have gut loads of cash to spend on R & D, leave it alone...

Who believes beer made in a garbage can is as good as the brewery makes??? When you pay for the the name you pay for the research....

Anyhow, I'm sure after countless hours (what cost) you cobber will get it to be something OK... How much are those trick Jap items again??

Hope it improves without being a WAFTAM Chris,

Good Luck

TT :/

If I remember rightly it has RAM TUBES.:/

The plenum has a ramming problem then.Could be overcome with a ported head,cams & match ported manifolds to realy get things flowing?Or do you think that i have just gone too far and left the saine answer. :cooldance

The plenum has a ramming problem then.Could be overcome with a ported head,cams & match ported manifolds to realy get things flowing?Or do you think that i have just gone too far and left the saine answer. :cooldance

Ahhh no, the problem is distribution, not all cyinders get the same airflow at all rpms. A cam upgrade works the same on all cylinders, so it doesn't fix the distribution. Ditto porting, matching etc.

So there are 2 ways to overcome uneven distribution, the first is to design the plenum to even out the airflow. Not easy, aerodynamics is a very tricky science, Nissan spent millions to get the standard plenums right. The second is to compensate for the different airflow by programming the ECU to supply different amounts of fuel to each cylinder. This keeps the A/F ratios in the safe zone and makes more power as you don't have to run one cylinder rich in order to overcome the one or two lean cylinders.

Hope that helps:cheers:

And you don't expect anything sensible @ 11pm on Friday Night...

The guys that design these items for OEM do have a fair idea. While I concure with skids diagnosis, it is like grinding a cam to suit your inefficient plennum. Sounds like a WOFTAM to me... Imagine setting up A/F readings on all six cylinders... I have enough drama getting the one average right. Also imagine the turbulance the inrush of air has to go through by passing up to five velocity stacks (if that is what is being used).

Anyhow each to their own, I get "I told you so's from my tuner and crew cheif all the time.

TT

So the A/F ratios are hard to keep at a constant at any given rpm....So when a car is tuned with aftermarket ecu they really only try to make an A/F average accross the entire rpm range as good as they possibly can.So in cases like this it is not the tuners fault that it is not making the power it's the plenum design......

Maybee a fatter mid section in the plenum to give it time for the A/F ratios to even themselves out and a splitfire coil pack to burn the extra air and fuel quicker making its way into the cylinders...

Im not at all knowledgeable about this process so go easy....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You know, that is exactly the thing that I was thinking a coupe of hours ago. I even had a plan for a meme, involving one big one, another big one, and the Old El Paso girl saying "¿por que no los dos?"
    • NoS, 2 of the big ones.
    • Oh, that's grim. Something bad has been happening there.
    • Put an endoscope down the hole and saw this. Not quite all around the bore but a good 60% at least. Chin to the chest and towards further disappointments I guess.
    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
×
×
  • Create New...