Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Being that this is the wasteland,can I ask:who knows how to steer these damned iPod things...

I've got an ipod shuffle,which has 0 songs on it right now,and when I go to autofill it,the little bar on the bottom shows "4oo-something meg' used,"100-something" unused,and proceeds to fill about 30 odd songs to fill the remainder. The question is:if there's no songs,why does it say I've got so much used? And is there some way to "reset" my ipod so there is full memory space available when there's 0 songs on board?

in the manual it says to delete the songs OFF the ipod you just need to untick the songs from on the ipod song list in iTunes. this should work, but ive never had to delete songs before...

there will always be some memory used on the ipod, but it shouldnt be that much...

to put songs on your ipod you need to make sure the songs you want on your ipod are in your library and ARE ticked, once this is done, if it doesnt update your ipod automatically just right click the ipod icon on the left side of the screen and click update...

if you need more help gimme a buzz and i can walk you through it :mad:

Jayce, the shuffle is like a portable usb drive as well(ie ability to store other files on it). There may be other types of files that are using up some of the space. Maybe get rid of them if you don't need them to allow for more space for songs.

Other than that maybe format it if the computer sees it as a removable disk.

yea will be good to see it back i remember always hearing about it but having never seen it i didnt think much of the chump :happy:

then one day heading over dairy flat road see this car come flying up behind me thought hmm looks interesting then when he went past i saw the sinista plates :P will be great to have it back in action

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...