Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Simplest is to rotate the G-sensor module through 90°. The G-sensor is the gold coloured box located under the centre console, in the very middle of the car. Rotate it by 90° and fix it in its new position. Advantages: results in a far higher degree of front wheel drive torque split in cornering conditions; is the easiest of all modifications. Disadvantages: results in some wheelspin in straight-line acceleration at high revs; power understeer can occur; in wet conditions the car is still a little unpredictable. Summary: Gives an easier car to drive but isn't the ultimate mod.

This Mod is inly if your serious

With the G-sensor orientated as factory, disable the output of the lateral (cornering) G-sensor. This G-sensor input actually reduces the front wheel torque split as cornering loads increase. Cutting the wire results in a fault condition and the disabling of the four wheel drive and ABS systems. Instead, 2.5 volts needs to be constantly fed to this ECU input. This can be achieved by using a voltage divider (pot) as shown here. The pot should be carefully adjusted until 2.5 volts output occurs when it is connected up. Advantages: very large amount of front torque split in cornering; simple mod; superb in wet conditions; excellent straight-line traction. Disadvantages: excessive power understeer in dry conditions. Summary: great "wet weather over-ride" if switched in and out appropriately.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1067498
Share on other sites

Guys;

This is exactly the type of path that Julian Edgar took when he did his famous article for Autospeed. I think it's on here somewhere so a search under torque split controller should produce it. Details different approaches, pros and cons of each etc and gives a circuit for the configuration he settled on.

Good luck.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1068281
Share on other sites

i remember that he removed the g sensor and replaced it with an amplified signal that was adjustable with a controller in the dash so he could adjust the torque split for different conditions.. one click each for dry, wet, really wet etc ... good article would be handy on cars in improved production for more tunability for all conditions...

do you know if this would be allowed in that class Duncan???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1069377
Share on other sites

i remember that he removed the g sensor and replaced it with an amplified signal that was adjustable with a controller in the dash so he could adjust the torque split for different conditions.. one click each for dry, wet, really wet etc ... good article would be handy on cars in improved production for more tunability for all conditions...

do you know if this would be allowed in that class Duncan???

We have an HKS adjustable torque split controller on our Improved Production GTR, there are no problems with having an external ATTESSA adjuster in the regulations. The Production GTR has adjustable torque split control via the Standard ATTESSA ECU which has modified software, software is free under those regulations.

Hope that helps :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1070000
Share on other sites

If anyone is interested i have made up a few torque split controllers using a pic chip with an inbuilt anologue to digital converter for the input side and using pulse width modulation on the output, basically what it does is look at the input voltage and puts out a modified output voltage depending on what setting it is in. it works the same in principle as julian edgars one but is in a fairly small package 40mm * 70mm * 25mm. It has 12 different modes, mode 1 is 1:1 outputing what it sees on the input from g sensor no change from standard setting voltage swing, mode 2 is 10% degradation of the voltage swing upto mode 9 which is a 80% degradation of voltage swing, mode 10 feeds a constant 2.5 volts into the attesa taking away the influence of the lateral g sensor altogether, the other 2 modes are for two wheel drive. the first one feeds a voltage of around 3.5 volts into the attessa which tricks it into beleiving it is going around a sharp corner so biases the drive to the rears, in my gtr i have done a rear wheel spin in a straight line in this mode for about 30 metres before the fronts kicked in so it makes the car very taily, the final mode is just the same as pulling out the 4wd fuse, it is then just constant two wheel drive but also knocks out the abs (same as pulling the fuse) and the car must be switched off and then back on to get it back to 4 wheel drive mode. In my car (r32 gtr) i use the radio control buttons on the left hand side of the dash (am/fm & tuning) to switch up or down the modes and a 5mm led which flashes out which mode it is in. I have had it in my car and a friends gtr for around a month now and it is performing very well to date. I will be fitting one to a r33 gt-r next week, though i dont expect the difference to be as much as the with the r32 gtr but it will be interesting to see how it goes. The box itself is small enough to fit in the console near the g sensors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1070931
Share on other sites

interesting, I didn't realise you could get at the atessa software...got any more info?

The ATTESSA ECU came from Mines, it has 4 settings, #1 is rear drive only, #2 is ~20% front drive, #3 is 30% front drive and #4 is ~40% front drive. The G sensors are still there but don't do anything. The car has a Motec ECU with launch control, which switches from #1 (just to get the rear wheels spinning) to #2 then #3 then #4 (if the straight is long enough). Once the gearbox is downchanged, launch control is automatically turned off. This means it stays in #2 or #3 depending on which we choose before the race (ie; it doesn't change). We only use #4 when it is really raining. Note that this GTR has all homologated Group N stuff, ATTESSA clutches, front and rear LSD's etc.

In Production Car Racing we are not allowed to add things like switches or external controllers, so everything is done by software. It doesn't work as well as the switchable HKS controller in the Improved Production GTR, but better than nothing.

Hope that helps:cheers:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1070962
Share on other sites

SK ... have you found it making a noticeable difference at that level of tuning?

Oh it makes a difference all right, but it also adds another level of complexity. On the Improved Production car we have adjustable stabiliser bars, quad adjustable dampers (high speed & low speed, bump & rebound), adjustable ride height, many sets of springs with different rates, full adjustment in the suspesnion geometry, camber, caster, toe, anti dive and anti squat. By the time you add in adjustable drive, my brain aches trying to tune it.

An example, it has low speed oversteer. Bit more front bar, less rear bar , higher rear roll centre, more neg camber on the front, 1 click on the low speed front damping, 2 clicks on the high speed rear damping and then change the drive 2.5% more to the front. Damn now we have high speed understeer. Around and around we go.................... :headspin:

Too many things to adjust and not enough time, make that NEVER enough time to try them all. :boohoo:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1070964
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...