Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Simplest is to rotate the G-sensor module through 90°. The G-sensor is the gold coloured box located under the centre console, in the very middle of the car. Rotate it by 90° and fix it in its new position. Advantages: results in a far higher degree of front wheel drive torque split in cornering conditions; is the easiest of all modifications. Disadvantages: results in some wheelspin in straight-line acceleration at high revs; power understeer can occur; in wet conditions the car is still a little unpredictable. Summary: Gives an easier car to drive but isn't the ultimate mod.

This Mod is inly if your serious

With the G-sensor orientated as factory, disable the output of the lateral (cornering) G-sensor. This G-sensor input actually reduces the front wheel torque split as cornering loads increase. Cutting the wire results in a fault condition and the disabling of the four wheel drive and ABS systems. Instead, 2.5 volts needs to be constantly fed to this ECU input. This can be achieved by using a voltage divider (pot) as shown here. The pot should be carefully adjusted until 2.5 volts output occurs when it is connected up. Advantages: very large amount of front torque split in cornering; simple mod; superb in wet conditions; excellent straight-line traction. Disadvantages: excessive power understeer in dry conditions. Summary: great "wet weather over-ride" if switched in and out appropriately.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1067498
Share on other sites

Guys;

This is exactly the type of path that Julian Edgar took when he did his famous article for Autospeed. I think it's on here somewhere so a search under torque split controller should produce it. Details different approaches, pros and cons of each etc and gives a circuit for the configuration he settled on.

Good luck.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1068281
Share on other sites

i remember that he removed the g sensor and replaced it with an amplified signal that was adjustable with a controller in the dash so he could adjust the torque split for different conditions.. one click each for dry, wet, really wet etc ... good article would be handy on cars in improved production for more tunability for all conditions...

do you know if this would be allowed in that class Duncan???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1069377
Share on other sites

i remember that he removed the g sensor and replaced it with an amplified signal that was adjustable with a controller in the dash so he could adjust the torque split for different conditions.. one click each for dry, wet, really wet etc ... good article would be handy on cars in improved production for more tunability for all conditions...

do you know if this would be allowed in that class Duncan???

We have an HKS adjustable torque split controller on our Improved Production GTR, there are no problems with having an external ATTESSA adjuster in the regulations. The Production GTR has adjustable torque split control via the Standard ATTESSA ECU which has modified software, software is free under those regulations.

Hope that helps :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1070000
Share on other sites

If anyone is interested i have made up a few torque split controllers using a pic chip with an inbuilt anologue to digital converter for the input side and using pulse width modulation on the output, basically what it does is look at the input voltage and puts out a modified output voltage depending on what setting it is in. it works the same in principle as julian edgars one but is in a fairly small package 40mm * 70mm * 25mm. It has 12 different modes, mode 1 is 1:1 outputing what it sees on the input from g sensor no change from standard setting voltage swing, mode 2 is 10% degradation of the voltage swing upto mode 9 which is a 80% degradation of voltage swing, mode 10 feeds a constant 2.5 volts into the attesa taking away the influence of the lateral g sensor altogether, the other 2 modes are for two wheel drive. the first one feeds a voltage of around 3.5 volts into the attessa which tricks it into beleiving it is going around a sharp corner so biases the drive to the rears, in my gtr i have done a rear wheel spin in a straight line in this mode for about 30 metres before the fronts kicked in so it makes the car very taily, the final mode is just the same as pulling out the 4wd fuse, it is then just constant two wheel drive but also knocks out the abs (same as pulling the fuse) and the car must be switched off and then back on to get it back to 4 wheel drive mode. In my car (r32 gtr) i use the radio control buttons on the left hand side of the dash (am/fm & tuning) to switch up or down the modes and a 5mm led which flashes out which mode it is in. I have had it in my car and a friends gtr for around a month now and it is performing very well to date. I will be fitting one to a r33 gt-r next week, though i dont expect the difference to be as much as the with the r32 gtr but it will be interesting to see how it goes. The box itself is small enough to fit in the console near the g sensors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1070931
Share on other sites

interesting, I didn't realise you could get at the atessa software...got any more info?

The ATTESSA ECU came from Mines, it has 4 settings, #1 is rear drive only, #2 is ~20% front drive, #3 is 30% front drive and #4 is ~40% front drive. The G sensors are still there but don't do anything. The car has a Motec ECU with launch control, which switches from #1 (just to get the rear wheels spinning) to #2 then #3 then #4 (if the straight is long enough). Once the gearbox is downchanged, launch control is automatically turned off. This means it stays in #2 or #3 depending on which we choose before the race (ie; it doesn't change). We only use #4 when it is really raining. Note that this GTR has all homologated Group N stuff, ATTESSA clutches, front and rear LSD's etc.

In Production Car Racing we are not allowed to add things like switches or external controllers, so everything is done by software. It doesn't work as well as the switchable HKS controller in the Improved Production GTR, but better than nothing.

Hope that helps:cheers:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1070962
Share on other sites

SK ... have you found it making a noticeable difference at that level of tuning?

Oh it makes a difference all right, but it also adds another level of complexity. On the Improved Production car we have adjustable stabiliser bars, quad adjustable dampers (high speed & low speed, bump & rebound), adjustable ride height, many sets of springs with different rates, full adjustment in the suspesnion geometry, camber, caster, toe, anti dive and anti squat. By the time you add in adjustable drive, my brain aches trying to tune it.

An example, it has low speed oversteer. Bit more front bar, less rear bar , higher rear roll centre, more neg camber on the front, 1 click on the low speed front damping, 2 clicks on the high speed rear damping and then change the drive 2.5% more to the front. Damn now we have high speed understeer. Around and around we go.................... :headspin:

Too many things to adjust and not enough time, make that NEVER enough time to try them all. :boohoo:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54560-lateral-g-sensor/#findComment-1070964
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...