Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I need some good, good ugly comments. on fitting 245 tyres on a 9.5" rim (TE37 17"/9.5").

I know its a bit of a stretch altho there the tyres I want... Falken RS-V04 racing semi-slick.

Is this a good idea. I did have Dunlop D01J 265/40/17 on there previous but there all chewed up. I've been recommended these Falkens and thats the biggest size they make in 17.

It might interfer with quater mile runs. as there won't be much flex?

but good for track days..they are for a gtr.

input? am i crazy? pay the extra and get the D01's? any one ever used the RS-V04s?

thanks in advance.

shouldn't make too much difference. Best fit for 245 is 8.5ins. RS-V04 is designed for track....sidewalls should be much too stiff for drag. The bit of extra stretch should make them even stiffer. General opinion seems to be ...Falkens are good value for money but a couple of secconds a lap slower than the D01's

I've heard good things about the R1R's, says they wear well, warm up very quickly so are good for low lap events like sprint days where you usually do about 5 laps max. I believe they grip better than the Falkens too

  • 5 years later...
fitted ok guys..rims do stick a bit out over the tyre..should be fun..side ways are nice and tight. would be good if my car was for doorift.

anyway..hopefully they dont give me too much slip off the line.

pic please mate i have the same size and was planning on fitting these

And it would be a 255/40R17 that you should recommend, not a 45 in that case.

I run a 255/40/17 on a 9.5" rim, Federal advises the tyre is for 8-9", there is no stretch on the 9.5" or difficulty getting them on, they just fit :D

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
    • Yeap, legal modifications are limited  We have rules and regulations on what you can do legally This is for NSW, other states have different governing bodies  https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-transport/vehicle-registration/how-to-register/registering-a-used-or-secondhand-vehicle/modified-and-non-standard-vehicles https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-13.464-Light-vehicle-modifications-Vehicle-Standards-Information-No-6-November-2013.pdf Lots of people just roll the dice though and just hope they don't get picked up,  as the police and RMS occasionally run roadside inspections, getting "defected" for not complying can be a painful and expensive experience 
    • Out of curiosity, I believe the title of "Engineer" is not protected in Australia like it is over here. I'm curious, does Australia actually have professional engineers do vehicle inspections?  If so, Jesus Christ what in the f**k.
×
×
  • Create New...