Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i'd like to know how he has no MORAL obligation to hand the sample over.. wtf????   hes a supreme court judge!

he would hand it over if he was under at the time wouldn't he!! implies his guilt in my eyes!

absolutely.....what an amazing idea....no credability for Mr Judge.

Imagine he was the one ruling on a drink driving case?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55068-pigs-arse/#findComment-1075063
Share on other sites

I use to study legal studies i school and I learned

"The law is applied equally to all"

Now I've added my own extension to that,

"unless your in a position of power".

I would like to hear what he has to say to the next drink driver he comes across in court.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55068-pigs-arse/#findComment-1075669
Share on other sites

i'd like to know how he has no MORAL obligation to hand the sample over.. wtf????   hes a supreme court judge!

he would hand it over if he was under at the time wouldn't he!! implies his guilt in my eyes!

He does have a moral obligation, arguably. Just not a legal obligation. You wouldn't either in the same situation (have a legal obligation, that is).

Personally I don't think its all that amazing the sample got lost; these things do happen. I'm not sure anyone in the police service would loose it intentionally: why would they? It just makes them look bad. Moreover, it should be rather easy to track down which officer/etc was responsible for picking up the sample...

LW.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55068-pigs-arse/#findComment-1075675
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I have some contacts in this area and he was definitely sozzled.  Word is that he has been that way for about a year and a half now...

As usual Adam is on the money:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Judge-...0384433637.html

Not only did he have one copy of the vial but he also had the second. And knew everyone was looking for it.

Now resigned and in detox

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55068-pigs-arse/#findComment-1087180
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah. "New pump" does not have to mean "massive pump".
    • Well, can you still get an OEM pump, and by the time you're buying a Nismo/N1 etc, just buy another aftermarket pump. It's better to have the pump able to flow more if its needed, than for your pressure to drop off. At any point in time, you're replacing the oil pump in a rebuild. Aftermarket pumps are likely going to be a better economical choice, and they don't have any negatives, even if they can flow more.   Also, when you're saying "replace the pump gears" are you meaning leave a 25+ year old housing in the engine with unknown wear, and just put new gears in? As that sounds silly to me, especially if you do have that minute amount of wear, that means your new pump gears now have a little bit more clearance beside them, which means, whelp, you may not get to build a lot of oil pressure or make a lot of flow.
    • Right, but if you replace the pump gears + put a spline or sine drive gear on the crank on a Nismo/OEM/N1/etc pump at that point do you really still want more flow/oil pressure? Let's say this is a the aforementioned "keep it simple" build, no more than ~400 kW at the crank.
    • Strength. And on the early RB26, full engagement of the pump drive.
    • I really don't understand the point of aftermarket oil pumps if your particular engine doesn't need more oil pressure. As far as I can make sense of it the problem seems to be cavitation from sucking air, maybe the pump gear design with how it interfaces with the OEM crank, and maybe the backing plate screws wanting to loosen themselves. How does flowing more oil fix these issues?
×
×
  • Create New...