Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

been all over the shop getting quotes for fitting my intercooler (gtr on gts-t)

The mob ive just talked to said, the gtr cooler will work awesomely, but he wants to mod the plenum and move the throttle body to reduce piping

is this a good idea? the guy said he would use a curved section up to the front of the plenum

i like the sound of reduce piping, but have heard stories about custom plenums being dodgy and not flowing air to all cylinders

whats the go with that?

is there anyway we can test that all cylinders do get a propper air flow with the custom plenum?

is this the best way to install an intercooler?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55371-intercooler-install-modifying-plenum/
Share on other sites

Need a little more information on the "curved section up to the front of the plenum" bit. I know a few guys who have seen good numbers from fabricating a custom can on top of the standard RB25 bottom runners. G-Reddy of course make a plenum, plus a heap of major places here in Oz.

Do they flow evenly to all cylinders? A flow bench is used to check this often when being thought about, but I could imagine a lot of ones wouldn’t ... otherwise I guess the detonation threshold of the lowest common dominator, would be the point where the "limit" is reached.

If you were going to hang onto the car and start making serious power, the custom top half would be a good start for me I reckon!

... but just ma pinion.. =)

Think had about how much pipe length you will save, is it really woth it. There is a pressure loss of about 25 Pa (N/m2) (0.0036 Psi OR 0.00025 Bar) in 1m length of 65mm (2.5inch pipe) really, is it worth all the effort. The maths to work out that pressure loss is at the bottom of the post.

Also,

The factory plenum and inet runners were designed that way for a reason, very close to symmetrical flow with equal length runners, ie equal air flow to all cylinders so fuel trimming is not required.

Personally, I do not like the design of most aftermarket inlet manifolds, sure some flow better but pressure drop between cylinders can be significantly different resulting in different air flow and screwed up fuel trimming (some cylinders running rich, some lean - makes it very hard to tune). If you want to do it properly your are going to need a management system that allows fuel trimming, eg, Motec, (can't comment on PFC, Wolf etc.. never had experience).

My advice, leave the factory manifold unless you want really big power numbers, save the money,

Here is the maths to work that pressure loss;

Air at 60 oC flowing in a 1 m galvanized duct - 65 mm diameter - with velocity 15 m/s. (All guesses at a typical operating condition)

Reynolds number Re = dh v ρ / μ

where

v = velocity

ρ = density

μ = dynamic or absolute viscosity

Re = ( 1 kg/m3 15 m/s 0.065 m ) / 2 x 10-5 Ns/m2 = 48750 (kgm/s2)/N ~ Turbulent flow

Using Moody Diagram - the friction coefficient - λ - is:

λ = 0,015

The major loss - Darcy-Weisbach Equation

hloss = λ ( l / dh ) ( ρ v^2 / 2 )

= 0,015 (1 m / 0,065 m) ( 1 kg/m3 (15 m/s)^2 / 2 )

= 25 Pa (N/m2)

= 0.0036 Psi

= 0.00025 Bar

So with a whole extra meter of intercooler piping you would see 6.9964 Psi instead of 7 Psi at the manifold.

That formula is for a "straight" piece of pipe yeah?

Not taking into account the extra bends involved or the fact your still running over

the top of the motor(heatsoak).

What about how long it takes to fill that extra volume.

Not knocking you just asking a question.

the plenum i have on mine is a custom top half.

i leaned out the a/f ratio on my rb25 and held it flat and finally blew at 260km/hr

interestingly enough the cylinders that went were 3 and 4 not the end ones like everyone thinks

"Just" is right the calc is for straight pipe, I was more just pointing out that there is dick all pressure loss in uniform pipe with that diameter at that velocity. You can work out the minor losses (ie losses from bends, valves (throttle) etc..) with the eqn below.

All just an excuse to use those old uni books.

ploss = ξ 1/2 ρ v^2

where

ξ = minor loss coefficient

ploss = pressure loss (Pa (N/m^2)

ρ = density (kg/m^3)

v = flow velocity (m/s)

hloss = head loss (m)

g = acceleration of gravity (m/s^2)

Typical values of minor loss coefficient

Flanged Regular 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.3

Threaded Regular 90 deg Elbows ξ = 1.5

Threaded Regular 45 deg Elbows ξ = 0.4

Flanged Long Radius 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.2

Threaded Long Radius 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.7

Flanged Long Radius 45 deg Elbows ξ = 0.2

I pulled most of this stuff off http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com - really usefull sight.

If you want to do it properly your are going to need a management system that allows fuel trimming, eg, Motec, (can't comment on PFC, Wolf etc.. never had experience).

Power FC's have individual cylinder trim for the injectors.:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You don’t need to use full throttle all the time to break these blocks, 500kw at the wheels in more then enough to break them even with an occasional squirt. Hell I’ve seen them break under 400kw
    • A work around is to install the R35 card style AFM/MAF on the cold side of the intercooler piping and the BOV on the hot side piping. Works well, also you can combat the revs dropping by adding a bit more ignition timing on the idle ignition timing table to slow the rate of RPM drop.
    • Understood. If you dont have a ridiculous limit,  Tune, T's and P's are in check, and arent bashing it all the time and doing the due deligence for maintenance(inc oil analysis) then its pretty safe. 100% agree, let your right food control it to some extent.
    • So these external kits with the machined block for remote solenoid mount will only work on a NEO head and RB30 or RB26 bottom end   For an R33 head on a 26 bottom end the remote vct kit is to resolve RB26 manifold adaptor plates etc  IF you try to use the remote VCT on an RB30 or RB26 bottom end with an R33 head then  you can starve the cam journal??? I have one of these kits from bits I had years ago before plans changed  I don't understand how that tracks with this video   https://youtu.be/RuPiI22Mplk?feature=shared   This looks like I can run the v termite vct kit to feed the VCT on an R33 head on an RB26 bottom end?!?!?   Lol.... don't v have these problems on RB20s
    • Yeah i know that MAF is no no for this type of BoV. The engine has no BoV and "hose/pipes" ..it was all deleted (or probably it was not even on the engine when it was bought  ) It does that "sutututu" noise which i kinda do not want(atmospheric is better IMO...but standalone ECU)  What are the cons of running without blow off on stock RB25DET NEO. It running 5-7 PSI max (it has boost controller)   EDIT: and can Nistune be "tuned" to know there is no BoV to i dont know "know" and be better for a car? I read so many info about no BoV. One guy saying it is bad and hurting the turbo/engine/car and other that it does not...  
×
×
  • Create New...