Jump to content
SAU Community

Power vs torque


Recommended Posts

Guest mightymax

I cannot figure this out maybe some fellow forum members can help me out.... :)

What influences power and torque?

1.)For example running increases stamina/endurance while wieght lifting increases strength for human...

For cars what mods increase power or torque???

OR

2.)Is it dependent on the nature and characteristics of the ECU?e.g.power fc vs possumlink

OR

3.)Can the tuner trade off power and torque?

Foe example:car A: 100kw(power) and 50nm(torque)

car B: 50kw and 100nm(torque)

Which car would have a advantage on a flat surface and a steep slope?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/
Share on other sites

Torque is a twisting force, just the same as you would apply with a spanner to do up a nut.

Fifty foot pounds of torque is like a fifty pound weight on the end of a one foot spanner. Or five pounds of force on the end of a ten foot spanner.

This is simply a force pushing, pulling or twisting on something.

Power is the rate of work being done, or force times speed. If you do something twice as fast, it requires twice the power.

So, power equals torque times speed. expressed Ft-lb x RPM.

A long time ago a guy calld James Watt got himself a genuine hairy horse, and did some measurements to see how much weight his horse could lift or drag in a certain time.

He decided that his horse could lift a 550 pound weight one foot each second, and this has now become the standard unit of horsepower. True !

We now have the formula , Horsepower = Ft-lb x RPM / 5252

Getting back to internal combustion engines, torque is twisting force only. The main factor deciding torque for a non supercharged engine, is the size of the engine, that is the bore, stroke, and number of cylinders.

Power for a heat engine is the rate at which air and fuel can be burnt in a given time. So power has more to do with airflow through the engine than the size of the engine.

I small high reving motorcycle engine can make a lot of power because it can spin so fast, but will not have a lot of torque because it is small.

A huge truck engine will make a lot of torque because it is big. But because it cannot spin fast the power will be relatively low.

A gearbox can reduce the speed of a shaft and increase the torque at the same time, but the power remains almost exactly the same.

So a one hundred horsepower motorcycle engine fed through a reduction gearbox can produce the same torque and RPM as you would get straight from the one hundred horsepower truck engine.

Does that help ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-84273
Share on other sites

Okay - easiest way to get more torque is to increase capacity. Now how do you do that on a motor? Increase the boost.

If you want more power, you play with your mixtures, let the motor breathe better, etc etc...

matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-84666
Share on other sites

Power=Torque*RPM*a constant

If you make good torque at high RPM you make good power, and can take better advantage of gearing.

My last car was a Civic VTiR, which had bugger all torque, but peak torque was over 6000RPM, leading to peak power of 118kw at 7200rpm.

I am driving a 3L diesel lowlux hire car at the moment, which has heaps of low torque but this drops off well below the 4500 redline:uh-huh: . It can accel up a steep hill in fourth at 1700 rpm, but would do a 0-100 in 15 seconds.

Power is all about where your torque is in the RPM range.

As an aside dynos don't measure power they measure torque and calculate power from this and tyre rpm or tacho rpm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-84709
Share on other sites

Originally posted by b2barker

As an aside dynos don't measure power they measure torque and calculate power from this and tyre rpm or tacho rpm.

Exactly! I'm glad someone pointed this out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-85260
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Warpspeed

Torque = acceleration, power = speed.

You got that around the wrong way. With a lot of power you can gear it down for very quick acceleration, but without the torque your top speed will suffer. So on a simplistic basis, you could say that power=acceleration and torque=top speed. Of course gearing affects this, but that's the basics.

A lot of people talk about fast drag cars which have a lot of torque, but these also have a shitload of power. Take a look at a Mack truck. It has mammoth amounts of torque but not too much power (on a relative scale). They accelerate like slugs but can still get up to well beyond highway speeds. You're not going to run a 9s quarter mile on a normal truck engine no matter what your gearing is.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86801
Share on other sites

Well jim your half right.

I still say torque = acceleration. Which gear gives the greatest rate of acceleration, first gear or top gear ? Why ?

Tractive effort is what accelerates the vehicle.

Now if you want to talk about the fastest way to cover a certain distance, that is different thing altogether. What you need is the HIGHEST AVERAGE SPEED to cover a given distance in the shortest possible time.

For this you need high power, because time becomes an important part of the problem. So yes, high power is the most significant factor in getting a low ET, or high terminal speed.

So power = speed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86848
Share on other sites

Warpspeed,

Torque is the only thing acting on your wheels, so you're splitting hairs here. The simple reason why your car accelerates slower in a taller gear is because you are reducing the power to your wheels. Have you ever seen a dyno chart? The torque curve stays fairly flat all the way along, but the power goes up with the speed and eventually tapers off. If what you were saying was true it'd be the other way around.

What I'm saying is if you have a high powered engine with not a lot of torque, you can compensate for a lack of torque with gearing, which will improve your acceleration but won't improve your top speed unless you had a really short ratio, and you lengthen it to the point of finding the engine's torque limits.

Once you're past the threshold of your maximum torque, no amount of gearing will increase your top speed. Even if you're not redlining, eventually there will be a gear ratio that will limit the vehicle's top speed. It is a lack of torque here that's stopping you going any faster, not power. Therefore you could say that the amount of torque governs your top speed.

Your example actually illustrates this. You're talking about a high terminal speed. You're using power to accelerate to this speed, not maintain it. So yes, you need a high powered engine to get to that point as quickly as possible, but the actual speed you can reach is a reflection of your torque.

Even most normal cars have enough power and torque to keep accelerating way beyond the standing quarter mile so it's not a very good example. I have ridden 250cc motorcycles that can accelerate quite quickly to about 130kph, but the top speed is like 150 and the acceleration from 130-150 is much less than from 0-130. When at 150 in top gear, the engine is way below redline but it just won't go any faster even if you drop it back a gear. These bikes have high powered engines (40hp or so) but very little torque, which is why they can't go any faster.

I maintain that I am entirely correct, and even your example proves this. If I'm half correct then that means you're also half correct, which means we're both correct? That doesn't make any sense :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86857
Share on other sites

I have read through what you said a few times, and cannot disagree, I think we are looking at the same problem from a different angle.

For instance you say when you go up a gear the power to the wheels drops because engine RPM drop. Quite true, I had never really thought of it quite like that.

And as you say if the torque curve is (almost) flat, then the torque at the wheels will drop because the reduction ratio through the gearbox is less in the higher gear. It is really saying the same thing but looking at it from a different perspective.

When gearing a competition car for maximum performance it is the power curve that is most important. Gearchange points should be either side of the maximum peak power point so maximum area through the power curve can be used in each gear.

The torque multiplication through the gearbox will be maximum under these conditions in each gear, giving greatest acceleration.

If you only rev it to the engine torque peak at the same road speed, you will be in a much higher gear, and actual acceleration will be less.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86869
Share on other sites

Warp u sumed it up with this statement, I was wondering who would get it right first 10 points.

"Gearchange points should be either side of the maximum peak power point so maximum area through the power curve can be used in each gear. "

totaly true. thats how i geared my car

my car only uses a 1500 rpm rev range

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86944
Share on other sites

Guest (_W.4.S.P._)

this is a great topic ,,

For cars what mods increase power or torque??? c'n'paste

so torque will get increased by a longer stroking engine or by a larger cubic capacity

and

power will increase by getting more revolutions per minute onto the rear wheels ?( motor, g box , diff ? )

umm ,, side Q? ... what stops a cummins turbo deisel from reving to 9000 per min? roller bearing the thing and put it in a gemini and bombs away ????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86968
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean I can be OCD'y but this is really over the top. At that point why not just run a full wideband fuel controller? Especially if you run 3 widebands. The system works pretty well, which is trimming low load stuff to be within a few percent of the base map. Pre-engine _change_ the base map was only 1-2% off, depending on ambient temp, elevation, etc. Under load the LS is really very straightforward to tune, enough that a wideband closed loop would be overkill. If I really cared (and I hope I don't) I can always just go back to the MAF system the car actually came with. Which does all those nice calculations for me (temp, altitude, etc), now that you can buy 102mm MAF's that do not cause restrictions.
    • Good afternoon Team , just a quick update on performance mods  Current Mods list (Installed) HKS - Power Editor (Came with the car) looks to be some kind of boost controller RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Cat Back  RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Front Pipe AMS  - INFINITI Q50/Q60 RED ALPHA COLD AIR INTAKE KIT AMS  - Performance Heat Exchanger Intercooler Not Yet AMS Alpha Performance Full Race Down Pipes  - to be installed in May 
    • I'd be installing 2x widebands and using the NB simulation outputs to the ECU.
    • Nah, it's different across different engines and as the years went on. R32 era RB20, and hence also RB26, the TPS SWITCH is the idle command. The variable resistor is only for the TCU, as you say. On R33 era RB25 and onwards (but probably not RB26, as they still used the same basic ECU from the R32 era), the idle command is a voltage output of close to 0.45V from the variable resistor.
    • It's actually one of the worst bits of Nissan nomenclature (also compounded by wiring diagrams when the TCU is incorporated in ECU, or, ECU has a passthru to a standalone TCU).... the gripe ~ they call it the TPS, but with an A/T it's actually a combined unit ...TPS (throttle position switch) + TPS (throttle position sensor).... ..by the looks of it (and considering car is A/T) you have this unit... https://www.amayama.com/en/part/nissan/2262002u11 The connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit, is the TPS (throttle position sensor) ...only the TCU reads this. The connector on the unit body, is the TPS (throttle position switch) ...ECU reads this. It has 3 possible values -- throttle closed (idle control contact), open (both contacts open, ECU controls engine...'run' mode), and WOT (full throttle contact closed, ECU changes mapping). When the throttle is closed (idle control contact), this activates what the patent describes as the 'anti stall system' ~ this has the ECU keep the engine at idling speed, regardless of additional load/variances (alternator load mostly, along with engine temp), and drives the IACV solenoid with PWM signal to adjust the idle air admittance to do this. This is actually a specific ECCS software mode, that only gets utilized when the idle control contact is closed. When you rotate the TPS unit as shown, you're opening the idle control contact, which puts ECCS into 'run' mode (no idle control), which obviously is a non-sequitur without the engine started/running ; if the buzzing is coming from the IACV solenoid, then likely ECCS is freaking out, and trying to raise engine rpm 'any way it can'...so it's likely pulling the valve wide open....this is prolly what's going on there. The signal from the connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit (for the TCU), should be around 0.4volts with the throttle closed (idle position) ~ although this does effect low throttle shift points if set wrong, the primary purpose here is to tell TCU engine is at idle (no throttle demand), and in response lower the A/T line pressure ... this is often described as how much 'creep' you get with shifter in D at idle. The way the TPS unit is setup (physically), ensures the idle control contact closes with a high margin on the TPSensor signal wire, so you can rotate the unit on the adjustment slots, to achieve 0.4v whilst knowing the idle control contact is definitely closed. The IACV solenoid is powered by battery voltage via a fuse, and ground switched (PWM) by the ECU. When I check them, I typically remove the harness plug, feed the solenoid battery voltage and switch it to ground via a 5watt bulb test probe ; thing should click wide open, and idle rpm should increase... ...that said though, if it starts & idles with the TPS unit disconnected, and it still stalls when it gets up to operating temperature, it won't be the IACV because it's unused, which would infer something else is winking out...  
×
×
  • Create New...