Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, just wondering what price i would be looking at for a 1995-1996 R33 GTS Non turbo Skyline? A dude from my school just bought one for $14,000 private, and this is so nice!!! cant belive the price he got it for, 70,000 K's on it. Now i do want to buy private not import. So what price do you think, pretty stock with about 70,ooo - 1oo,ooo k's on it?

Thanks heaps,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55715-what-price-to-pay/
Share on other sites

1995 - 1996 R33 GTS NA

ok so it is RB25DE based on $10,000 for a car thats done 70K already.

this is rough estimate.

If it is Series Two + add $1000

If it has ABS, Sun Roof window add $1000

If it has HICAS Add $1000

+ what ever the mods are; pod wheels etc..etc.

Personally I wont pay no more that $12,000 for NA Skyline.

I aint Used car anal-ysist so take as you like.

cheers

Joe

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
×
×
  • Create New...