Jump to content
SAU Community

camshaft upgradingR33 GTR


pulse_30
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm thinking of upgrading my R33 GTR camshaft to 272 stage 2 with valve spring. I've heard that several modification has to be done. Maybe head shimming or something with the valve / shim the tappet as the lift is higher. Please advise. As i know for stage one camshaft (272 also), i've installed into my friend's car without any modification on the head and no problem to date. Any advise is highly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't make my mistake. I ordered valve guides, springs and retainers after I bought my step 2 cams. There was a lot of additional machining/shimming.

Buy the set with the cams as they will all be matched. Should only have the machining to clear the lobes and basic shimming to do then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't make my mistake. I ordered valve guides, springs and retainers after I bought my step 2 cams.  There was a lot of additional machining/shimming.

Buy the set with the cams as they will all be matched.  Should only have the machining to clear the lobes and basic shimming to do then.

HUH????Just buy the cams and springs.....mill out the head....then fit them in and adjust the shims......whats "the set"????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Main issues are the valve guides and retainers - apparently there are a number of different types depending on the lift (or "Step") of the cam. I haven't talked to the workshop that did the head work, but at a guess I would say I bought the "Step Pro" instead of the "Step 2".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Installed  Nismo coppermix twin competition spec last year in my bnr32 with pull trans with Oem slave cylinder. The point at where the clutch disengages/enages is right at the top of the clutch pedal, meaning I barely have to push the pedal down for the clutch to be disengaged.  You guys that have the same combo are you experiencing this high pedal bite point??   Secondly I’d like to have the disengagement point lower meaning I have to push the pedal more(further not effort)for it to be disengaged.  I’m thinking to use a Nismo big operating cylinder(bigger bore at 13/16 vs Oem 3/4) which will require more pedal stroke to get the equivalent movement at the clutch fork. But I see Nismo web site says not to mix these 2 as the Nismo big operating cylinder doesn’t have enough stroke to disengage??? Any folks run both the coppermix twin pull with Nismo cylinder??    Thanks in advance for the replies but prefer only guys with pull clutches to respond. thanks     
    • Any chance u could let us know where your based ?
    • That’s a great deal and I would jump on it if you were closer. Melbourne is a bit of a hike for me though unfortunately 
    • I wonder if there is much to tell without knowing where the bolts where bought from. If it comes from Amazon or similar all bets are off. Can't trust them. And I fear not everybody knows that. Wasn't it @TurboTapin who ended up with the fake fuel lines recently? The submersible ones which very much weren't submersible at all. It kind of applies to everything nowadays. Doesn't matter if it's hardware or electronics. The fancy camera might have internals swapped out for cheap knockoffs. The hard drive will report a certain size but not actually be able to write it all. Shit like that. A bit depressing but the reality is you really have to be weary of where and how you buy stuff
×
×
  • Create New...