Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi ppls,

I'm after a set of new ~550cc injectors.

I figure I could get a set of RX7 V 550cc injectors for a decent price but I would then have to have them flowed & tested which bumps the price up close to that of new injectors.

Another thing that concerns me with the RX7 injectors is the spray pattern.

'Apparently' they have more of a squirt than a fine atomistation.

The squirt is fine for performance as it works well to get the fuel in but for fuel economy it is not the best.

Has any one got these Injectors and have kept an eye on the fuel consumption before and after the install?

I am looking at possibly importing:

Sard 550cc's (~600-700)

Nismo 555cc's (~700-800)

or possible even go to the HKS 600cc (~800-900).

I have no idea on the spray pattern of the aftermarket injectors and if they are indeed setup to squirt or atomise the fuel for good emissions/fuel economy. For all out power the squirt type injectors are apparently the way to go.

I can find RX7 5 injectors for around $300 or so + $200 for flow & clean. Thats ~$500 which is pretty close to the price of bran spankin new injectors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/56451-what-550cc-injectors-should-i-go-for/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There is a guy up here who reckons he can highflow existing rb25 ones to 780cc.. Says not by simply enlarging the actual nozzle size which can cause spray issues, but replacing the whole pintle? Says they have been tested with excellent results at high HP with no issues (of course he would say that)

It sounded dubious to me.. What issues would there be with this? Is this guy talking out his butt?

I am willing to spend the $$.

Mid January is when the injectors will be needed so I've got a little time to do a little bit of research in to what is good.

I want some thing that not only does the job but does the job better.

My 32 is a daily driver so I prefer to have good fuel economy.

At the moment the 3ltr on the rb20det ecu nudges 500km's to a tank on occasions and never gets any lower than 430km's per tank, exactly the same as what the RB20DET used to get. I want to try and keep that fuel economy.

Providing the injectors are atomising the fuel correctly I don't see why a larger 550cc injector wouldn't provide the same fuel economy after the PowerFC is all tuned up to suit the 3ltr.

I would never think about highflowed injectors, they make me nervous.

I have a problem trusting peoples abilities.

Can any one throw around their fuel economy figures?

larger injectors always mean bad fuel consumption....;)

More power = more fuel needed....as you know Joel :rofl:

My RX-7 550's use about the same as std economy when off boost, but like said above, dont expect std fuel economy with some big guns installed ;)

I'm more concerned about the spray pattern and atomisation.

That is what affects fuel economy.

550cc's aren't that large and should still be able to atomise fuel well.

It appears there are also injectors that the spray pattern is designed around 2 inlet valves etc.

what bout some vr4 injectors or injectors from a 7mgte supra engine?

for the vr4 injectors you have to bore the rail a tad for them to slip in and i believe you have to do the same for the 7m ones.

you may have to run a dropping resistor pack for them, but its another alternative should you choose aftermarket injectors.

yeah there both side feed, purple top sr20's injectors are 370cc injectors, s15 red top injectors are 480cc

a certain knowledgable person claims single pintle injectors are the only ones hes seen to have issues, ie sard.. and recommended to go for 4 pintle ones, ie nismo

logically thinking i would assume the 4 pintle ones would have better spray and atomisation over a larger single pintle injector

I hi flowed my standard injectors to 660cc. No real difference in fuel consumption. Power from 380rwhp to 420rwhp with ease. Never had trouble with them. Now there making over 450rwhp.  ONly difference noticed was at idle.

What Idle differences did you notice?

I got the Nismo 555cc's and noticed that idle sounds a bit rough every now and again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @joshuaho96 Hmm considering the drama you've seen/experienced, have you looked into getting a built complete long motor shipped from Australia?  Considering the AUD is basically monopoly money when compared to the USD, at a glance this seems like a good option?
    • Bloody Skylines, they put you through the bloody wringer! Stick at it! Stunning drag strip BTW! Where is it? Can see part of the name on the slip and probably should just Google it!
    • I mean the other day I had to walk someone through diagnosing why their timing belt was walking off the cam gears. At least one of the issues was a bent tensioner stud. Local mechanics have found runout on the CAS mechanism causing weird failures. I'm also no saint here I've documented some of the things I've had to learn the hard way. Something I discovered recently is that my CA emissions catalytic converters weren't even welded correctly to align the downpipe to the main cat and they tossed the support bracket that goes from the transfer case to the downpipe to support everything there. I spend a lot of time chasing down these decidedly unsexy problems and the net effect is it feels like I never actually get to the original objective (flex fuel, VCAM, oil control, cooling, etc).
    • At times with how you make everything sound, all I imagine Americans doing when they see a gtr is standing there looking at it and bashing it with a gun like how a caveman would with a club and hoping it fixes itself 
    • I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
×
×
  • Create New...