Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Well, we dynoed my RB26DETT 240SX today...

The first time we dynoed at factory boost settings, which on my boost guage was 9 PSI...

We made 320 rwhp or 239 kw, I believe this is about average for stock ecu, stock motor, etc...

Our importer thinks the motor had cams, but we aren't sure... It does have a lope to it, and if I was a betting man, I would think there is...

Maybe you guys can took a look at my dyno chart and give me an idea of what you think...

On the second pull, we upped the boost to 15 PSI, or 1 bar...The car pulled timing and started knocking...

I'm not sure if it was the fact we only had 93 octane gas in the tank, or whether the timing might be advanced too much...

The first graph is of the stock pull at 9 PSI... The second graph shoes all three pulls, with the last two being at 15 PSI...

Thanks!

Chris

umsportsrb26dett240sx1.JPG

umsportsrb26dett240sx2.JPG

Do you guys think the car has cams based on this dyno?

I was really impressed for having a totally stock motor, stock ecu, etc...

The only mods were downpipe and exhaust...

Boost controller turned to 15 PSI for the last two runs...major knocking...and not sure why...

I think you will find that the US rate their fuels differently to us in OZ, so 93 isnt equiv to OZ 93RON, actually i cant recall the unit they use but its not RON.

I take it when you say stock motor, you arent including exhaust, filter, intercooler etc With exhaust, good IC and filters and 1 bar of boost id say that would be pretty typical rwkws for an RB26.

Yeah, for 9 PSI, it's very impressive.. The sound is so loud of those turbos...

The guys that were there were commenting on how nice it sounded..

You would have really thought it was two HKS turbos with all the noise...Very loud for stock...

But, what do you guys think about the whole cam situation? Do you think it has them?

Also, why do you think we were getting knocking on the 15 PSI run?

We think that the timing may have been advanced by whatever Japanese person last had the motor... We assumed it was stock and never messed with it...

But after the knocking tonight, and the the fact that it looks advanced, we are going to check it...

Tomorrow we will be adding 118 octane race fuel and giving a 15 PSI pull...

Just from the graph she looks pretty much stock, there are other stock rb26 pulling higher figures in oz.

Also i believe and knows dynojet dyno give a higher reading than our dyno dynamic ones.

Don't let the low number dicourage u, there are ppls on here with huge hp from a stock motor with some bolt on stuff,

A cam motor has a sharper rise ihp section dependant where it comes on and alot of time when u get a motor, you usually get the aftermaket turbo free before the cams.

Aftermarket cam gear is another giveaway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So the clockspring is responsible for the indicators cancelling on their own? I thought that was the function of that white thing in the center (any idea what it's called?)
    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
×
×
  • Create New...