Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

whatever the sub is, the amp becomes. it powers the sub

if ur sub is 4ohms, the amp will see a 4ohm load

if ur sub is dual 4 ohms (u have 2 x 4ohm coils) and u have one chnnl to run off the amp, then the amp becomes a 2ohm load on that channel.

the resistance of the sub is just how the sub is configured.

just make sure u get an amp that matches ur sub and vice versa.

and u dont get to choose to run ur amps at peak power...they run at the RMS power based on ur gains etc. This power changes when u apply different loads (resistance values)

decreasing resistance to a 2ohm load say from a 4ohm load, will allow more power to be delivered from the amp...but u have to make sure ur amp is stable at this level.

thats why monoblocks are so good, theyre designed for JUST subs which can handle low impedence loads. (read 2ohms some 1ohm some less).

basically.........match up ur speakers to ur amp.

Nav2k's correct, I'd just like to add that having dual, low impedence voice coils allows for a very large number of wiring configurations.

When dealing with normal speakers, a higher impedence is better for sound quality. This doesn't matter with subwoofers as the sound isn't distinctive like midrange is.

Lower resistance places higher load on the amp because current increases, higher current at a given voltage equates to a higher thermal dissipation which is a consequence of the amp producing more power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
×
×
  • Create New...