Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Well, we took the car back for day #2 of dynoing the RB26DETT 240SX..

Yesterday, we experienced some motor knock, and found out the timing was advanced to 22 degrees...

Today, we retarded the timing to 18 degrees and gapped the spark plugs to 0.8....

At factory PSI, the car dynoed 251kw, and 263.6 lbs of torque...93 octane pump gas..

At 14.7 PSI , car dynoed 286kw and 318.3 lbs of torque...93 octane pump gas..

I believe with a SAFC, we can smooth out the power curve and pick up another 12-19 kw....

Here's the dyno graphs showing baseline and high boost...chart shows rear wheel Horse Power as measured on Dyno Jet...

umsportsrb26240sx3.jpg

For reference, my stock motor from a R32 made 253rwkw @ 1 bar dynodynamics, but that is the usual 98 octane.

93 octane would be a serious disadvantage, and, although its hard to estimate I'd figure with my basic math it'd be somewhere between 190rwkw and 205rwkw dynodynamics.

There is certainly a bit more power in a better tune

My motor is a R33 RB26DETT....

Keep in mind, I am RWD! The motor is in a 240SX (AU 200SX/Silvia)

I don't lose anywhere close to the drivetrain loss you AWD guys do...

And while the difference in your dyno dynamics is different, it's not that big...

I will get some dyno comparisons, but its no more than 20kw from seing my friends cars...

Most of us GTR boys don't do awd dynos, we drop our front shaft, and go on a RWD dyno...

My RB26DETT stock motor/ecu, with adjustable cam gears and an exaust, boost uped to 1bar (~15psi) pulls about 280rwkw in shootout mode, which is considered good on standard turbos/cams etc....

Maybe you have adjustable cam gears? where do you find boost coming on full?

My motor is a R33 RB26DETT....

Keep in mind, I am RWD! The motor is in a 240SX (AU 200SX/Silvia)

I don't lose anywhere close to the drivetrain loss you AWD guys do...

And while the difference in your dyno dynamics is different, it's not that big...

I will get some dyno comparisons, but its no more than 20kw from seing my friends cars...

You can't draw a "direct comparision" between the US Dynojet power figures vs. the Aussie Dyno Dynamics - simple as that! The same car run on both dynos back to back would give a markedly different result... the higher figure being on a dynojet.

The late Todd Wilkes did quite a bit of research into these two dynos and published the results for all to see on his website - http://www.twinturbov8.com/dynostuff.htm

This is not an attempt to take anything away from your results underground... just stating some basic facts bewteen the two dynos.

Guest two.06l
two.06l: adjustable cam gears ? what ECU? what boost?

no cam gears as yet, power fc running default map on 15psi. we are shooting for over 300rwkw. have just fitted engine pipes, will be fitting cam gears(with DIRTgarages secret specs) and going for a full tune.300 should not be too far away.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...