Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently had a few mods done, eg plenum cooler and computer. Now my car only made 180kw at the wheels

I was wondering how different dyno's compare with read outs, Cause I have raced skyline's with 200-220kw and made a meal of them

So is mine makin more power than my dyno sheet is sayin

I ran it at calder and got 13.2 at 108.7mph

Does that seem right for a car with only 180 at the wheels

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/57090-dyno-results-vs-14mile-et/
Share on other sites

i ran 13.8 @ 104 with 2.2 60ft i think, and i had about 180rwkw maybe a bit less (at time of 1/4 run)

but mines auto and i couldnt stall up any higher than 2000rpm without the wheels spinning on the spot, ide say if you launched at 2000rpm you'd have a simialar time to me

so yeh, all looks good :)

I recently had a few mods done, eg plenum cooler and computer. Now my car only made 180kw at the wheels

I was wondering how different dyno's compare with read outs, Cause I have raced skyline's with 200-220kw and made a meal of them

So is mine makin more power than my dyno sheet is sayin

I ran it at calder and got 13.2 at 108.7mph

Does that seem right for a car with only 180 at the wheels

Sorry not enough data to make a call. R32 or R33 or R34? GTST, GTR or GTT? Manual or Auto?

Cause I have raced skyline's with 200-220kw and made a meal of them.
That's quite easy to do at the drags just from experience and knowledge. In some races you can make 0.75sec on the other driver just in reaction time and 0.25sec in 60ft time, so theirs 1 full second in the first 20m which has absolutely nothing at all to do with engine power. At 1 of my last drags I did I raced a forum member whom had around 250-260rwkw (180rwkw for me). I knew he'd get me easily in the TS so I made an extra effort to get off the line before him and make him run me down. As above I had him easily in the Reaction and 60ft and even by 3/4 track but in the last 100m when his turbo kicked in he blew past me like I was standing still. I did a 14.1sec and he did a low 13sec pass.
So is mine makin more power than my dyno sheet is sayin
They are 2 completely different things.

A Dyno measures how much power your engine is making minus the drivetrain loss giving a result. It doesn't matter whether it's your mum revving out your engine or the guy from your local fish & chip shop as it is still going to give the same result on that dyno.

A 1/4 Mile drag race measures how good your suspension setup is, traction, accelleration, top end, driver ability, track preperation, weather conditions, experience, knowledge and how big your balls are.

I ran it at calder and got 13.2 at 108.7mph
I'd be pretty happy with that. I think 108mph (not knowing what your 60ft was) would be good for a 12.9sec pass though, hell I see torana's doing low 12's with only 108mph every wednesday night so its not the TS but more so the first 330ft is where all the time is made, after that it comes down to just pure horsepower.
Does that seem right for a car with only 180 at the wheels
I wish, i'm at ~180rwkw and can't for the life of me beat a 14.1sec :) I'm determined to break into the 13's before I sell my car though.

Holy hell - your dynos must read extremely low, or your tracks must be insane.....

I'm thinking it might be a bit of a combination. I did 14.1 @ 103mph with 2.35s 60ft time with 183rwkw in the manual GTS25t here, on a cold unprepped track and raced and beat all the other R33s present, as well as a manual twin turbo 300ZX.

Holy hell - your dynos must read extremely low, or your tracks must be insane.....

I'm thinking it might be a bit of a combination. I did 14.1 @ 103mph with 2.35s 60ft time with 183rwkw in the manual GTS25t here, on a cold unprepped track and raced and beat all the other R33s present, as well as a manual twin turbo 300ZX.

Either your dyno read's high or the timing system of the track is out.

14.1 @ 103 mph indicates around 165rwkw's

183rwkw's you should be able to get mid to low 13's at 105 - 107mph - with good traction.

wsln33

Sounds like your car is more towards the 195 - 200rwkw mark with 108mph at 13.2. - 2.5 60fter

And yes different dyno's can read differently - depending on calibration and air temps etc.

:)

Jun

a lesson I've learn't lately is that peak rwkw doesn't meen that you are going to run a certain ET or mph at the track even if your launch and changes are up to scratch. Good ET's and even a nice high mph depends alot on your power curve and other things as such .

Take my GTR as an example currently making 270rwkw on a dynamic's dyno best ET and mph so far is 12.1@114mph with a 1.760ft and nice clean changes at the right rpms all the way down the track. Just looking at the peak power and comparing it with other r32 GTR's you would think it should be mid to high 11's at something closer to 120mph but it isn't .

7heavn, have you worked out what is up with your car and that time? Could the dyno be reading too high? How is the power made? Peaky or linear? I mean you are getting 1.7 60 ft's, so it really isn't lacking at the line. Is it running clean in the top end?

I just ran a few numbers on a calculator and came up with 11.88@114MPH, so the MPH is there, but the time is a bit out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Me, I would happly spend some more coin on better tyres for my street car  Will they work, yes, of course, but why substitute some dry grip/braking distance, and wet weather grip/braking distance on what is really old tech to save some coin on your "precious" street car In the end it might not be you that farks up, it's the thousands of other idiots on the street that you need to worry about  For a street car that gets some "fun time", I have found that a quality tyre that can handle dry, wet, cold (Canberra gets pretty cold) and hot conditions, which may costs a little more, is great insurance  From my experience with them (driving around Goulburn in the winter) the RE003's are pretty poor in cold and/or wet conditions on the street If RS4's didn't hate gripping in the cold I would be running them always on the street,  great in the dry, OK in the wet, but, they do hate the cold, with a passion, I run PS5's year round now, basically, I've found the PS5 to be a great year round street tyre for all conditions, they last well, and are mid range pricing wise TL;DR. Tyre choice is probably like what brand and grade oil you should use, ask 10 people, and get 10 different answers... LOL
    • Extend the sensor out of the car, put it in a pot of oil, heat oil up. You'll get to 80-120 then 😛
    • Yeah - I tried throwing the formulas from ChatGPT and it tried it's best as it told me that the Formula in HPTuners as requested is a Linear function, but the original data I provided it (resistance to temp) is not linear and thus it kept trying to suggest formulas that would be more accurate in regions I actually want it to be accurate in. But I didn't quite understand it at the time. I have now thrown the data into graphs and can clearly see they're all different shapes. Given it's an oil temp sensor I probably want it to be most accurate between 80 and 120c - So I don't really see much alternative other than driving the hell out of the car and letting it cool down from 120C, noting the voltage on the sensor as it chills out. But at that point if I write it down, well, I'll be able to know this from the voltage. Would look pretty stupid on a datalog or a video showing me going down the straight at 0.265V Oil temp 
    • Yeah, it looks like it's being ran as a constant current setup is my guess. Get some more data points, reading the degrees C on the gauge, and what the voltage is you're seeing out of it. The sensor itself is not linear, even in smaller ranges of like 20 - 60 it's non linear. But if we can get some good plots, particularly at those 5volt steps, it will be very easy to work out, and then I can give you a logarithmic formula if its you need an actual formula. Also, very likely ChatGPT will lead you astray with some of this stuff, as it totally depends on how the circuit is built.
    • So to further complicate things or hopefully explain better: This is a VDO sensor. It clearly does this math inside the gauge itself... because it displays a temperature in C to me instead of a voltage. The signal wire to the gauge is in Volts, not Ohms. I have just teed into this and sent it to the ECU. ChatGPT spat this out: Temperature (°C) Thermistor Resistance (Ω) Voltage Output (V) -40 36563.56 4.973962698 -35 26284.63 4.963854097 -30 19149 4.950518086 -25 14127.68 4.933166097 -20 10504.68 4.910527969 -15 7721.35 4.879055954 -10 5720.88 4.838133512 -5 4284.03 4.786165799 0 3240.18 4.721119717 5 2473.6 4.640900563 10 1905.87 4.543692515 15 1486.65 4.429695182 20 1168.64 4.296344225 25 926.71 4.144091368 30 739.98 3.972492431 35 594.9 3.782907287 40 481.53 3.577860996 45 392.57 3.361217186 50 322.17 3.136573398 55 266.19 2.908608143 60 221.17 2.68039363 65 184.72 2.455599277 70 155.29 2.239608872 75 131.38 2.035132288 80 112.08 1.846579676 85 96.4 1.674774149 90 82.96 1.511882199 95 71.44 1.359001674 100 61.92 1.222169588 105 54.01 1.100403407 110 47.24 0.989775394 115 41.42 0.889528391 120 36.51 0.800974069 125 32.38 0.723478416 130 28.81 0.654148313 135 25.7 0.591893137 140 23 0.536380597 145 20.68 0.487551867 150 18.59 0.442640126 155 16.74 0.40213318 160 15.11 0.365841848 165 13.66 0.333073247 170 12.38 0.303758956 175 11.25 0.277572169 180 10.24 0.253917873
×
×
  • Create New...