Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys/gals

i have recently puchased a r33 and i am looking to do a few upgrades. and

at current the only mods the car has is: 3" zosrt inc dump pipe and high flow cat, pod filter, blitz atmo bov, turbosmart single stage boost controller, apexi aif flow meter corrector(i think thats what it is???). before i bother doing any ecu changes i will be fitting a 600x300 fmic though.

now my question is once i have the cooler combined with my other mods (listed) what is the best way to go about tuning my car to get the most from the setup? am i better off with a complete aftermarket computer? a piggy back style computer or am i just able to have the std ecu remapped to suit? what ever i choost i want to be able to use for future upgrades as well so i was thinking about going to the path of either a piggy back or aftermarket ecu.

i have noticed that the apexi range is used very common amoungst rb owners, jus wondering if any of their products would be suitable for my aplication? if so which specific ones? as i have seen many mild and wild rb's using apexi electrical products.

another alternative which was suggested to me by a local tuning workshop was a 'uni chip' piggy back style computer, can anyone comment on the performance and tunability of these products? i was informed that these were completely retuneable yet keep all the factory ecu settings like cold start, air con, idle etc.

thanx in advance, and sorry for the long rant!

cheers1

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/57143-best-ecutuning-options-for-rb25/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

power fc is full stand alone replacement ecu. removes speed cut, boost cut and fuel cut, adjustable rev limit, fuel and ignition maps (20x20) and access to some other features that i cant remember

sounds pretty good, is it worth looking into some of the more basic products in the apexi range? not to sure what is what. is there a model that will allow adjustment of air/fuel, timing etc?

apexi safc II

www.apexi-usa.com

how good is the safcII? can anyone who has used or is using one with a mild list of mods (exhause, fmic, boostcontroller, pod) shed some info or recomendations?

would i need a full stand alone comp like a power fc, or would something like a safc II be quite adequate for my needs? and still be good enough to support a future turbo upgrade?

safc II is generally good for very mild tune of the rb25

front mount, boost controller, pod/cai box, exhaust and thats probably about it

once you wanna run bigger injectors, diff turbo, air flow meter youll want the power fc

you will get more benefits from stand alone like powerfc of course but its not always needed. the safc can be a cheap alternative, but remember you have to get the safc fitted and tuned. buy is around $450 then fit and tune prolly $250

the powerfc is $1100 delivered gives you all the features of safc plus stacks more

I had an SAFC in my car after i turned up the boost. Didnt really help much just saved me some money on fuel. I was getting pretty bad detonation. Then upgraded to a Wolf3d version 4. Have not had any probs since.

And yes there is a PFC that is plug and play but you will still need to have it tuned.

Steve

Go the power FC, easy to fit and tune, Never headr a bad report

When you fit your cooler, I suggest getting a plenum made up to,

If you plumb your intercooler up to standard intake manifold, piping is like 3.2mteres long!

With the plenum its under two meters and a hell of alot more responsive and torqey!

Have fun

id suggest against changing the stock plenum. there has been numerous threads and its been aruged over and over. the stock plenum is good for over 500hp and doesnt need changing.

the cost to change plenum to save a short amount of pipework is not worth it, its like .0023psi pressure drop from the extra pipework. you wont loose torque just a bit more lag in the system from the piping, the plenum will cost you $1000 odd, you can spend that money on much better suited products instead, likes cams, ecu, injectors, clutch

Go the power FC, easy to fit and tune, Never headr a bad report

When you fit your cooler, I suggest getting a plenum made up to,  

If you plumb your intercooler up to standard intake manifold, piping is like 3.2mteres long!

With the plenum its under two meters and a hell of alot more responsive and torqey!

Have fun

when you say get a new plenum made up do you mean a completely new, larger flowing item, or modifying the stock plenum so the the throttle body is facing forward instead of towards the passenger side of the car???? as i have seen this done before and looks quite effective.

Go the power FC, easy to fit and tune, Never headr a bad report

When you fit your cooler, I suggest getting a plenum made up to,  

If you plumb your intercooler up to standard intake manifold, piping is like 3.2mteres long!

With the plenum its under two meters and a hell of alot more responsive and torqey!

Have fun

Sorry wsln33, I gotta dissagree, the intercooler pipework length makes no diference to torque.

Using a 120 degree bend at the throttle body reduces the difference by more than 50%, to a bit less than 1 litre using 75 mm pipework.

To work out the throttle response difference the calculations are easy;

2500 cc X 5000 rpm / 2 (4 stroke) at 1.3 bar = 135 litres per second

So a saving of 1 litre represents less than 0.005 of a second

That's not a lot of lag to save with reduced pipework.

Not a good idea in my opinion, especially when you consider the potential to loose throttle response due to poor airflow distribution is far greater than that.:)

I'm running a Wolf 3D 4+ on the RB25DET I fitted to my GTS4. On crappy 95 octane and 10psi, pumping 180 kW thru ALL 4 wheels (probably 210 rwkW).

There is a straight plug-in replacement (like PFC) available for the R33.

r33steve, did you have the safc tuned? if so you didn see any benifits?

The only benefit i got was saving a little money on fuel and slighty reducing the detonation i was getting. My standard computer was running ridiculously rich. I wouldnt buy another one, Id go straight for a stand alone.

Steve

I have had an SAFC2 installed about 2 months ago and i must say it's the best money i have spent. Yes the standard ecu when boosted made it run hell rich and produced 160 rwkw with a nasty flat spot and then after the install and tune of the SAFC it was a healthy 189rwkw and no flat spot. Sorry to hear your results Steve but i must say im very impressed with my end result. Stock cooler stock turbo, 3 inch from dump, EBC set at 12 PSI.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I haven’t taken them out of the cases yet    inside the box is this packaging which is pretty much like a massive blister pack 
    • Purchased a NC MX5 a while ago Basic suspension mods done, BC coils and Whiteline sway bars  New DBA calipers, discs and pads Added some 17 x 8 Konig Decagrams with 215/45 17 PS5's Added some typical NA bolt on's, i.e. full exhaust and intake  Added 0.5ltrs with a MZR2.5 swap, nice bump in torques  Found a detachable hard top which is locked in for a colour match with my local paint shop in Feb 25, this also includes some PDR as it has received a few love taps from parking in the local shops when in the hands of my Minister for War and Finances, me, I park nowhere near other cars and typically park on the street The little thing is awesome, I drive it everywhere, it handles like a dream whether I'm up it or just cruising  But now,  because I'm a idiot, I keep looking at turbo kits....... did I mention I'm a idiot Why is dose so appealing  All of the NA 2.5 glory, well.......until sometime in 2025 anyway....🤪  
    • I would not be surprised if you are the only person on earth that has the interest/desire to do that lol.  The Haltech base map is a really good starting point, the car will fire easily and drive very well, even on mild boost levels. To me, following your advice sounds like some sort of ancient Chinese water torcher lol (this is not an insult Josh, never change <3)
    • Those car show concepts from the 2000's and 2010's like the Floria and IDx were brilliant and should've gone ahead, at least one of them. But neither Honda nor Nissan are thinking about affordable performance any more, which is truly sad.  Even if Toyota's liquid hydrogen ICE development reaches the point where it's commercially viable and the infrastructure to support it, Honda/Nissan would have to wait until Toyota allow fee access to their patents to offer it with any smaller performance models they released to take advantage of it.  
    • A sporty manual RWD coupe with a IL4 Honda engine would only be a good thing I assume we won't see anything released for a few years though, unless informal talks and designs have been going on for a few years,  and due to the current, and future, emmisions and safety requirements, I assume anything "sporty" they would do would be at least some hybrid thingie And hopefully anything they are thinking of has nice lines, without lots of plastic and fake bits hanging off it like that horrendous FK8 that looked like it was designed by a 13 year old The other issue of course in the current market is cost, currently the type R is around $70k, a twin is around $50k Meh, I'm old and grumpy and would rather buy a older model car and waste my coin on that than buying anything currently available new  
×
×
  • Create New...