Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

to everybody who says put it on dyno,

I know this would be the best way to slove the problem but im the kind of guy that loves to solve problems myself and not just watch someone else do it. I would rather blow up the motor than have someone fix everything and not knowing exactly what was happening and what he did.  

The most fun about having a quick car is playing with it.

Thanks for all your help though

are you also the type of person who likes replacing thier own engine?

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

tomj,

yeah sure, love pulling motors in and out and pulling them apart. I have a snatch block hanging from my garage all year round. still, it does not beat sex, i don't have a wank over cars like some do.

Can anyone verify that my fuel pressure is too low (50psi) at 15psi boost?

cheers

50psi is about right.. stock rail pressure is 38psi + 15psi boost = 53psi.. which is close enough as BHdave is saying also.. I think you may be adding the standard boost pressure there in your mind to whatever you are thinking... the workshop manual is saying 37.5 + 7 (stock boost) = close enough to 45 :rofl: .. where as 15psi + 38 = 53psi..

why you are trying to run 14psi+ on a stock intercooled, stock turbo (I assume?), stock ecu, rb20 is beyond me a bit.. but you can try.

tomj,

        yeah sure, love pulling motors in and out and pulling them apart. I have a snatch block hanging from my garage all year round. still, it does not beat sex, i don't have a wank over cars like some do.

Can anyone verify that my fuel pressure is too low (50psi)  at 15psi boost?

cheers

im not having a dig, but why go through all these headaches when one run could save you so much time stress and maybe an engine.

50psi seems about right though

predator,

I have a 600*400*80mm front mount, standard turbo, yes i know but im just playing till i find a rb25 turbo.

I did a search and rang around and the fuel pressuse is supposed 2 be 45psi +/- boost, ie 37.5psi at idle, and should be 60psi at 15psi boost. I can clearly see it rise to 60, then fall off to 50 at the higher revs.

In goes another pump, yay.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...