Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

pressumed wrong.......RB25

yes, but this IS an RB20 thread :P

Anyway, should have the money soon for a full microtech retune, dyno run and to fit bigger injectors.

Currently running 9psi on the RB20 with twin T28's, full boost at around 4.5k.

Going to up the boost to around 12psi, see what she does.

who cares if its an RB20 thread theres people putting there silvias and so forth in saying yeh ive got sum power in my SR or CA......so i decided to share, quite simply put, why descriminate engines and say its just an RB thread.

who cares if its an RB20 thread theres people putting there silvias and so forth in saying yeh ive got sum power in my SR or CA......so i decided to share, quite simply put, why descriminate engines and say its just an RB thread.

THIS is a RB20 thread!

If you want to talk about your *fast* 25 then start your own thread!

  • 2 weeks later...
Mad RB20 In the works.

Super T70 Turbo

750cc Injectors

HKS drag cooler

Custom stainless exhaust manifold and dump pipe etc.

Dyno and 1/4 mile time to come... ;)

Hey looking forward to hearing about this ride.

Turbine

anyway, put my RB20DETT R31 2 door on the dyno, for a full tune and bumping up the boost.

Got 182rwkw @ 7000rpm on 13psi of boost in 5th gear. Dyno wasn't a dyno dynamics and this dyno was known to read lower than dyno dynamics dynos so meh.

anyway, put my RB20DETT R31 2 door on the dyno, for a full tune and bumping up the boost.

Got 182rwkw @ 7000rpm on 13psi of boost in 5th gear. Dyno wasn't a dyno dynamics and this dyno was known to read lower than dyno dynamics dynos so meh.

Huh? 5th gear??? If so that would be some crazy power wouldnt it?

yea gears make no difference, the guy just decided to run it in 5th, guessing to maybe avoid wheel spin and get a clean run

as for responsiveness, it isn't great, but im used to it, and once it passes around 4000rpm, it pulls like a fkin steam train. Haven't really paid much attention to the boost gauge, just the tacho, seeing peak power is made so damn high up in the rev range, with a dead stock top and bottom end, so i couldn't really tell you when full boost is reached, suppose i could check tomorrow :rofl:

To be quite honest, im kinda dissapointed, i want MORE! :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...