Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

LOL...farkin spreadsheets :D I was bored at work and trying to do it covertly. Im half pissed and bored at 12.30am in a hotel...ill try again but cant guarantee the result will be any better considering the state im in :D

that 4th gear comparo for road speed to revs...cool, i need my spreadsheet on my laptop to work it out accurately. What sized tyres have you assumed, (tyre circumference)???

i actually was going to give it a go as well but for some reason this laptop does not have excel on it... random

um, my tyres were 255/40/17's and was about 36.6, but i just worked out my mate with 235/45/17's was around 37.6

somewhere around there so make it around 37 and u will get if fairly accurate

How is that? It seems i had changed the scales to try and move the boost curves away from the power plots, and it all went bad from there...but i think this looks better.

Yeh its pretty easy to do the conversion, but im lost without my laptop, i have all the gear / diff ratio, tyre sizs etc on it.

Cerbera, if my understanding of your Apexi turbo is right, you have the P25 exhaust housing, which is about a 0.96-1.01 A/R housing.

Would love to see your results if you used the smaller P22 housing, dont they also do a P20 or something (IHI use mm instead of inches so i think you just divide the PXX /25.4 to get an equivelant Garrett A/R, so P25 is 25/25.4, so about 0.98 A/R)

The P20 is about an A/R size of 0.78 which would get that thing boosting way earlier and harder

im unaware of how the scale of the apexi to convetional garret a/r works but just looking at the housing it is at least as big as a 0.8a/r

my turbo came only in a p25 or p22 housing so im unsure if you would be able to connect a p20 housing as the actuator mounts may be not suitable ?!?

i do agree with you tho, the p22 housing would probably be much more suitable to the 2l and i doubt i would loose much top end if any

only problem is finding a housing to borrow or buy for the test, apexi turbos dont seem to grow on trees :D

Edited by Cerbera

Yeh , i had a bit of trouble finding the smaller housing on the TD06. But im sure that IHI use metric where as Garret use Imperial, so P22 woud be 22/25.4, so about 0.86.

Ill have a look around tomorrow night. Based on the changes i saw in power with the smaller housing...your thing would be a hard to beat setup that s bolts to the std manifold. Be interesting to see of you crack the top end your hunting after the next round of tweaks

next round of tweak is going on as we speak :D

new ignition is already on, but still the miss

fuel pump died on friday so hopefully replacing it with bosch 040 will maybe fix the miss as it may have been the rail running low pressure top end

also tossing up the idea of welding a external gate onto the standard manifold for better boost response and control as well as to lower the backpressure in the exhaust manifold top end

Edited by Cerbera
much better :)

looking at carl h graph makes me get bad ideas about upgrading to gt30r love and some cams

its really not that laggy for the extra power

hahaha, oh you know you want to join the darkside.

also keep in mind my engine wasnt in good nic (140 psi HOT! across all cylinders) so on an engine with higher compression its very possible it will come on earlier and even harder than she did in mine.

gt30r is very well suited to the rb20, almost as if it was designed for it......

post-1415-1136441792.jpg

I found this plot on NS of a TD06 on an SR20DET with Greddy TD06 L2 20G, Built motor, Hks 256in/264ex, Hks cam sprockets, Autronic, Msd Cdi, Bosche coils, Blitz 850cc, Bosche fuel pump, Blitz intercooler, Blitz stainless pod, Blitz Sbc iD.

Was havign a sticky beak as im playign with motor combos at the moment (will probably not end up doign any of them) and all this talk about SR20DETs being more responsive etc etc. Plus if an RB can be put in an S13 so easy, then surely the SR is a relatively straight forward swap. Combined with the weight savings, cost of 4 rods/pistons etc, and the much talked about lack of torque of the RB20, against the SR superiors supposed ability to spool turbos

Phew, get what im getting at :( LOL a tweaked SR20 appears to be no more repsonise then a std RB20 with the same turbo setup. So the first comparison i found doesnt do the SR20 chitter chatter much good

Im hunting around for a few equivelant turbo SR v RB20 comparisons. It appears that the weight of the average S13, combined with the gearing is probably proves more a factor then the additional stroke fo the SR20 in making it a more lively street car.?!?!?!

So Round 1 with SR20 vs RB20 with TD06 is a draw :)

Perhaps a win to the RB20 considering it doesn thave cams :)

Yeh but from the results i have been looking at, the whoel SR being ouncjier then the RB20 is a crock. The RB20 doesnt have any trouble matching the power of similarily modded SR20s.

Be interesting of more ppl plotted torque on the right axis rather then A/R or psi

I'm in two minds at the moment... Whether to swap to a 25 if(when :() my 20 blows, or to keep the 20 and work the tits off it.. Its for drifting - a few of the guys over here have bulk power coming from 25's on standard internals.. so I dunno what I should do...

Roy, I think you'll find the S14/S15 SR20DETs with VCT spool the turbo a fair bit quicker than the S13 donk thanks to the added overlap in the midrange. Disable the VCT and the turbo becomes suprisingly alot more laggy...

Edited by Busky2k

LOL... then i want one of those HKS vatiable cam timing RB26 kits for the little RB20:)

Will be interesting to compare, a friend had a 230-240rwk S14 with Nizpro setup and its not overly different to my car to drive..though he did say his car did have a bit more urge if you were crawling up a hill at 2,500rpm in 3rd, so under load or light throttle could be worlds apart

With regards to off boost accel.

Maxx's r33 RB25det felt as if it had the same low down urge as his s15 sr20det.

HOWEVER, the sr20 didn't feel as revy and the power band felt shorter due to the shorter 6speed ratio's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How's everyone going? Just a shout-out introducing myself. I'm James, I live on the north side of Brisbane. I bought an R33 that had been left to rot in someone's front yard for 14 years. Apparently, it has immobiliser/fuel issues. Long story short, it's suffering from a seized engine, plus whatever else turns up once it runs. The car is pretty good considering it sat for so long. It pretty much died after being imported. It has a bunch of Jap parts and a full Top Secret body kit. It's painted Fiat Turchese Festival, or aqua blue if you're not French. Another project to throw money at!
    • So the clockspring is responsible for the indicators cancelling on their own? I thought that was the function of that white thing in the center (any idea what it's called?)
    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
×
×
  • Create New...