Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im the onlt one brave enough to say what everybody is thinking...for 8-10k you can get yourself a prime XP Falcon Coupe, or VF Valiant Coupe:)

My old Val was a bucket of sh1t, really it was, but the girls digged it. They see me in my R32 and they all think im a pretentious wanker:( Old school cool cars are fun to drive, fun to own, you can spin tyres easy enough when you want a bit of fun...and you sell them for the same money you buy them.:P

Only pron is with super prices being what they are, you may have to get an LPG conversion:(

I'd prefer something a little bit unique, so no pulsars, falcons or barinas.... i might consider a lancer.
haha well you're contradicting yourself a little bit there :P

a lancers the most non-unique thing u could get!! not to mention being a little on the errr gutless side..

as mentioned already, a Pulsar SSS example would be a good choice, also a Laser TX3 coupe (non turbo cos that's what you're after) example. Both look good, have a bit of street cred (u won't get laughed at like you would in a hyundai coupe heh) and have pretty good performance.

Another (cheaper!) option is a Corolla Seca SX example ...plenty of money left over for other things, 100kw...

all 3 have base cars that a very popular so servicing and parts should be cheap and easy :)

i've read in many places that the 1.6 mx5's are very disapointing for the money. but you dont buy something like that for performance, just that you can drive it without a roof!

Celica convertable imported is similar money but looks a lot better on paper and there are very few around........better performace (4WS :D)

hey what about an old skool celica, RWD one.

All the cars mentioned above (except for the r32 or ae86 with 10k of mods) are gutless boring cops!

Has anyone owned a turbo s13/180sx? They are leagues better than the FWD brigade abovementioned.

Though, echelon9, if you dont want to die as easily or have as much fun, best stick to the lancer.

we just imported an AE92 Levin, supercharged 1.6L FWD, and its farken aweeeesome. Screw the RWD pundits that say you can't have fun in a FWD. Its got so much lodown torqu (even tho its a bit gutless on the topend). Its got a clutch activated supercharger (aftermarket) so you can turn it on and off (love to see you turbo guys do that). It keeps up with a V8 SS Commonwhore from 1-100 but then it falls back.

Absolutely awesome street car for use in metro areas and very awesome fun to drive. Dosen't understeer as much as normal FWD and once the supercharger really bites it pulls you out of trouble usually. The one one of the guys owns smokes it in 3rd gear hehe the look on peoples faces when this oldish lookin corolla smokes up the fornt wheels thru the gearchanges...

Have to go for the N14 SSS! Girlfriend has one and i love driving it (when she's not around! :P ) So much easier to drive round town and uses less fuel than the GTR (don't get me wrong, i love my car more). She's got cat back exhaust, 17" rims and lowered. Looks awesome, goes well, number of people have asked to buy it...but she ain't selling it. I owned a 92 prelude before and it doesn't compare to the SSS!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
×
×
  • Create New...