Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What do you think about reverse flow FMIC piping on GTST's

What I mean is to come out of the turbo, across the top of the radiator down thru RH inner guard, thru intercooler and return thru LH inner guard using the factory intercooler hole and up to the engine crossover pipe.

The advantage is less heat soak to the intercooler pipng from the intercooler to engine. This will end up having the same amount of heat soak to the piping as the factory piping did

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/58589-reverse-flow-fmic-piping-on-gtsts/
Share on other sites

sounds like a good idea, no idea on the thermodynamics flow side of it. you would also have lesss bends before the input side as normally you need about 2 or 3 wide bends to get back to the plenum, whereas you only have 1 main bend which is from the outlet side to plenum inlet side, as the rest are just soft curves

i had my piping setup this way, works well and the pipe from the cooler to plenum doesn't get that hot.

this way you can also keep the pipe diameter 3" from the cooler outlet to the intake plenum if you want.

pic here

  • 1 month later...
  • 11 months later...

Mine is setup so that it uses the stock piping route.

The hot air comes out of the turbo down in to the front bumper via the stock piping route, it then runs below and slightly behind the FMIC which then does 2 90 degree bends in to the FMIC (drivers side), the tank has the inlet positioned in the center of the core.

The cool air then travels out of the fmic via a very short route back in to the stock piping and thats it :P

Touching the turbo out piping, its damn hot almost too hot to touch. :S

The turbo is pushed to its limits BUT the fmic is definitely doing its job as you can feel the inlet side tank being hot then over the core it gradually becomes cold to touch, the outlet tank and piping is cold, apart from the engine cross over pipe obviously.

Both methods have exactly the same amount of 90 degree bends so they should flow exactly the same, the across the engine bay does have a slightly shorter turbo outlet distance.

Hope that makes sense.. I was up at 3am this morning. :S

Edited by Cubes

i have a fairly cheap FMIC kit and the piping that come from the cooler to the inlet manifold gets hots i was just wondering if heat wrap would help? i know most ppl say it keeps heat in not out but there shouldn't be any heat in the pipes so instead it will just stop heat getting in. The outlet side of the FMIC feels nice and cold after a drive but that pipe gets hot

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
    • Thanks Paul I reached out to Autotainment but they no longer work on JDM cars as the guy who used to do the work moved on and is no longer doing that kind of work. I am talking with Level Up Audio though.
×
×
  • Create New...