Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

Just wondering if anyone's ever had the following problems fitting a turbo to an RB25DET, and if so, what did you do:

1. When fitting the turbo, being a highflowed standard unit, you've found that the original banjo bolts for one of the water lines, that used to fit perfectly, is now too long and effectively prevents you from screwing them in all the way...

2. When bolting on the dump pipe, the 2 centre bolts (of 6) are IMPOSSIBLE to insert due to the widened neck area of the dump pipe where it connects to the turbo.

Now logically thinking, but not being of sound mechanical background, will simply grinding the banjo bolt a couple of threads shorter effectively fix problem 1? As all i can see is that the bolt is too long, so shortening it seems the most logical action?

As for the second problem...can you leave these 2 bolts unbolted? Or at the very least, screwed in but not completely tightened?

So frustrating having the hardware ready to go but coming across problems like these...

P.S. Have a Fantastic Christmas all... and the enjoy new year celebrations after that.

:(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/59539-turbo-installation-problems/
Share on other sites

Both washers are on there... made 100% sure i didn't lose any of those...

I can actually see inside the hole where the bolt inserts a small mark where the end of the bolt made contact with the housing. Not happy bout it, but I didn't even realize the bolt was too long until i got to a point where i thought "stuff it i'll take it off again......"

1) Did you stretch the water lines? You might have to bend it back.

2) Are you using a new dump? I find with installing an aftermarket dump pipe i have to constantly move the dump so i can thread the bolt in. There is no way the bolt will go on if i tighten all the other bolts first.

1. The water lines were shifted slightly. Approx 2mm on the banjo with the length problem. I found that after I removed the turbo, and investigating how deep the banjo bolt actually went, that it was actually the length of the banjo bolt (too long) that was preventing it from securing the water line in place.

2. I managed to wiggle the dump enough to get one of the centre bolts on properly. I couldn't tighten it with any tool in my posession, however the centre bolt on the opposite side is making contact with a slight bend in the dump pipe. The bend appears to be from the round pipe being flattened to fit the exhaust side of the turbo. Abit annoying...that's why i'm curious as to whether or not i even need it....

It can't be a "standard" unit, otherwise the banjo bolts would still fit. Unfortunately, not the best time of year to be taking it back to the guys who sold it to you and ask for it to be remedied.

With the dump pipe, you will always have this problem because part of the design is to open out that area of the pipe. You could try replacing the bolts with stud / nut combo, but there's still the problem of getting a spanner onto the nuts to tighten them.

It can't be a "standard" unit, otherwise the banjo bolts would still fit. Unfortunately, not the best time of year to be taking it back to the guys who sold it to you and ask for it to be remedied.

With the dump pipe, you will always have this problem because part of the design is to open out that area of the pipe. You could try replacing the bolts with stud / nut combo, but there's still the problem of getting a spanner onto the nuts to tighten them.

The exhaust half is not standard anymore. It looks as tho they may have modified it/replaced it during the hi flow process as the oil line that sits on top still fits, but it is not the same as it was before (i took photo's of the entire setup prior to removing the turbo and although all the lines are roughly in the same spot, the connection doesn't look the same). Either way, All bolts except for the water line on the engine side of the turbo fit fine.

mmm... I think i may modify the bolt for the exhaust as well.... because that too is a length issue. I'll take photos nex time so it's easier to picture what's happenin'....

Don't be scared to shorten those Turbo water banjo bolts , they can be ground or cut shorter and the thread dressed up to suit . Just dont overtighten them too much and deform the banjo itself .

Good Stuff... All is well now. All the water/oil lines are in and there appear to be no leaks. All that's left now is to keep an eye out on the engine temps (as i think there is still some air in the water system which i need to bleed out)....

Car is running well... doesn't make that whining spool noise that i've become accustomed to..... Boost is heaps laggier, but more solid (if that's the correct description) i'm hoping that it will slowly become more responsive as i break in the turb....

Thanks for everyone's input. I gotta say the 'HOW TO' by JimX contributed HEAPS to getting the old turbo out:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=22118

Fingers crossed that nothing else decides to blow up (metaphorically speaking).....

Did you get the dump on properly?

Have you considered allen key bolts if not? Just an idea.

I put on 5 of the 6 bolts tightly.... The bolt in question i did not install...

As for the allen key bolts... I think that might work (as its the head of the bolt that prevents it from being fitted)...I'll pop down to the local auto shop & see if i can find something..

Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, but the narrowband is truly narrowband. So you take it out of the linear zone and it is effectively nonsense. And that linear zone is so literally narrow, that nonsense is not very far away. Unless they are flicking back and forth across the stoich point, for real, under actual control, they can't be trusted for anything except entertainment value.
    • I agree, and yet my "HRM " hat is also on, as his wideband is in disagreement with the narrowband where they used to play closer attention to each other.
    • That's the thing. Especially at idle, changing the cam angle by that much could be spewing more fuel out the exhaust courtesy of everything happening that bit later. More fuel also means more air (if the fuel didn't burn, then neither did the O2) and so the O2 sensors can start to tell interesting but misleading stories. And the specifics of what is happening could easily be affected by everything else you changed as well. And it could be dynamic, where a few revs more or less could somewhat change how the engine is breathing.
    • Good idea on the temp probe. The mv readings of the O2 sensors are very similar to one another, as is the injector pw. I went through logs in the past to see if there was a discrepancy and there is. Because they alternate up and down as narrowbands do.. they do often 'switch' as to which one is more. They were never 20%+ (more like 1-2%) so it's possible the difference between 20 and 15-17% is a similar discrepancy to 2.0% and 1.7% which I wouldn't have really noticed in the past. We did think about spacing the strut brace. Unfortunately the ~20mm that the GTR brace is lower than the GTT brace is effectively what you need to clear the vents. Moving it up would make it very uncomfortable, but it's plausible that 10mm is a unhappy medium between both hard places... The good news is.. using MR HAMMER it was actually pretty easy to bend back the bent bits to make sure the guard and headlight/new headlight tabs line up right. Yes, we used a R34 GTR guard to make sure the bolt holes all lined up with a known straight guard. As above, you can see the side skirt and the GTR guard are not meant to play together, but everyone seems to think this is a simple fix to the point where nobody who has had these talk to one another mentions how... ...so I'll just assume they know how to fix it when it comes to paint jail time again. Whoever they are. Nobody returns my calls. There's so much changed with regard to the ECU and the car.. that the next step really is to connect the scanner and attempt to drive the thing. It'll be pretty clear pretty fast how in or out everything actually is...
    • That's nasty! I think there is perhaps an inherent problem is using elastomers in such environments. The whole thing can and will get quite hot, and elastomers are not famous for their temperature resistance. On top of that, if the components are cast rubber or urethane and so on, there might be QA/QC problems with bubbles or voids in the material that could critically change their performance. They might just tear apart after being squished (presuming that any elastomers are used in compression rather than tension, I'm thinking that you squeeze one with a void in it and it tears the wall of the void to the outer edge of block, then the next time it extends or otherwise twists, it just gives up). This is all purely hypothetical, but it makes me wonder if the things that they have put into it to make it nice to use/live with are perhaps going to cause occasional failures like this. I wouldn't be getting up in arms over it, unless there are many repeats. I have personally ruined an Xtreme clutch - just an HD thing. I can't remember if it was still behind the 20 or was after the 25 went in. But it inverted some of the retaining spring/clip things around the outside. No-one could explain it. It wasn't thrashed, there wasn't heaps of torque being put through it, and there were no obvious problems other than the above. They were quite concerned by the event so they replaced it even though it was a few years old, which was very nice of them. As far as I am concerned, these things happen with clutches.
×
×
  • Create New...