Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have problems with my RB20det overheating.

I had a pressure test done, so it apparently is not a head gasket.

I had a new radiator installed, so that shouldn't be the issue.

I put a new thermostat in... so that should be OK.

I beleive it is the water pump that is the problem... I just don't think it is pushing any coolant through the engine... I don't think there is any flow.

The other day I was driving it to the mechanics (Will soon be doing water pump), and noticed that I was getting NO heat from the heater. Keep in mind, it's very cold here. The temp gauge began to climb high.... still no heat!

I shut it down on the side of the road and opened the hood. In freezing temp, the engine cooled down pretty quickly. Then I turned it back on and wouldn't you know.. I got heat out of the dash... but only for a few seconds, then it sort of ran out and went back to cold/mild air. Had to shut it down one more time to be sure not to get it too hot. Then turned back on, and got heat.. but only for a few seconds... then cold air again.

Is this a sign that I am not getting any flow of coolant through the engine? Does this back up my water pump guess? Is my heater core stuffed up?

I don't understand why I would get a little heat only at start-up, and then have it go away again very shortly after.

My finger's are crossed that the water pump will be the solution.

Please let me know what your thoughts are on the heater issue.

Thanks

was your radiator getting blocked up? this could have also happened to the heater core, low flow through that core would explain the heat at first then cooling off as there is no hot water passing through it to heat the air up again!

as for overheating... usually a water pump would leak through the front when the bearings go.... it may not be the cause..

have you run a flush through the system to clean it out?

Have you checked the thermostat is operating properly?

Have you run a diagnostic on the A/C system?

You can check for water movement by running the engine at idle (at operating temp) without the radiator cap, and then revving the engine - you should see water moving across the filler neck of the radiator.

Have you checked the thermostat is operating properly?

Have you run a diagnostic on the A/C system?

You can check for water movement by running the engine at idle (at operating temp) without the radiator cap, and then revving the engine - you should see water moving across the filler neck of the radiator.

I have not done a full system flush as I am told that is very expensive to do. Though I may have been given poor info.

The thermostat is new, and has been tested to open at the correct temp.

There is no A/C. The RB20det is swapped into a US model 240sx convertible. With the droptop, I have little need for A/C.

I will try with the radiator cap to see what I can see.

I am sure that the heater core is stuffed, as the radiator was so much that it needed to be replaced. But, if it was stuffed.. why would I get even a little... I would think I would get no heat at all?

Thanks

the heater is probably blocked but not to a point where no water goes through.

hence while it sits there it is able to heat up the core, but once the cold air is pumped through it it cools it down and the amount of water flowing through it is not enough to maintain temperature!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you really don't want to touch anything you can try to trigger off the timing loop just to see if it's sparking semi-regularly. Don't trust it for actual timing measurements.
    • Also replace the fuel filter aswell today
    • Hey everyone, I have a r34 GTT s1, im having a problem with my skyline, ive let the car sit in the garage for the last couple of months and havent run it and ive gone to fire her up today and it cranks but doesnt fire, i have been having problems with it previously where it wouldnt start again after driving it around for a bit. It use to start fine on cold start ups but if you drove to the petrol station and fueled it up and went to go start it again, it would just crank and not fire untill you let it rest for a few hours, the car doesn't over heat it sits perfectly in the middle while driving when warmed up. Im thinking this problem has caught up maybe and now it just wont start at all. The car runs on e85, ive checked the e85 seems to be fine. I can hear the fuel priming before you go to start it and checked all my fuses and relays. List of things I replaced today - New battery - New sparkplugs - New Coolant temp sensor I was thinking about testing the CAS but from what ive seen online, if the CAS is cooked, the car will actually start up but then die instantly? as mine just doesn't fire at all. Does anyone have any idea or have encountered the same problems? thanks
    • Modern reg stuff now, they'd have a wide input range which would push through a buck converter, it would need to be able to maintain voltage for cranking conditions (sub 9V at times). Likely runs something like an internal 6V rail, and then further voltage regulators depending on which circuit/area it is feeding. Modern voltage regs, like what I'm starting a new power supply design with at work, will let me run a 5V rail output, and as long as my input is equal to or greater than 5V, I have a 5V output. Except I'm not pushing a 5V rail in our system as I don't need one, we're setting up for a 3.8V rail. Our new design will allow me 6 to 60VDC input, and everything else doesn't care, even when I start pushing a few Amp outputs.   Realistically, the voltage drop off could be caused by a few things though, one could be literally the alternator is dieing, and hence charge power is dropping, which also means on a straight hard pull you're starting to send the battery flat... (Not that likely from a single couple of gear pull if the battery was fully charged). However, having earth issues, like stray earths not connected, or someone having put a ground loop in, will see the ECU appear to end up with lower voltage "input", mainly because the "ground" is no longer equivalent to battery negative. If they're comparing the input voltage using sensory ground for example, and sensor ground is what is in that ground loop, than the sensor output voltage will actually start to be reduced, when compared to battery ground... Yeah, ground wiring design can start to be a bitch... Also voltage going weird from inductive loads not being managed properly is another real bitch... Hence, why I asked above about how everything was wired in. If OP knows, and can post all of the actual connections from the ECU pin out, as well as what wires are joined where in the loom, which grounds from the ECU have ground points and where they are etc. Would help to see if there is a ground issue. The part I'd start with though, is putting a mechanical oil pressure gauge on to confirm the theory. Otherwise the next track day when the threshold is lowered could result in another of @Duncan favourite types of jokes... Knock knocks... Pretty sure this is what @GTSBoy is also self high fiving...  Is all great that we have a decent theory... But they need to prove it before relying on it...  
    • When I worked at BlueScope Steel, we had an Ethernet network, with every switch setup with a duplicate switch. Even when looking at all the primary switches, they had duplicate links, there was then also duplicated links between the primary in section A, to the duplicate in section B. So for each location that had networking, there was 8 network links. This was all back around 2007. That setup caused sooooo many issues, as many of those links were fibre. The network guys ran everything with Spanning Tree Protocol. And then we had great joy... The FOC Transceivers were slowly dieing, but in an intermittent way. And a lot of the time as they started to die, they'd drop offline for about 30 seconds... Spanning Tree Protocol was requiring 45 seconds to "rewire" the network... And by the time it was mostly finished, it had to start again as the transceiver was back online... Queue entire production network being constantly spammed with the spanning tree protocol messages...   My god I do NOT miss working in huge environments like that!
×
×
  • Create New...