R32GTST type M differences .

[discopotato03]

In the near future will be looking for a late (93/94) R32GTST Skyline . I've been in one that had 16x6.5" wheels and four piston front calipers . Does this make it an "M" spec and or what other differences exist . Are very clean std examples around and is 13 to 15 G's about the going rate ? I prefer white or light silver/grey , were these std colours ?

Any advise what to look out for much appreciated , Cheers Adrian .

[silver gts-t]

do a search for factory r32 options in the search

and look around

and r32 dosnt come out in 94 except gtr

those colours were standard

[BHDave]

It could just be me, but i have never seen an r32 gtst without 4 pots front and twin pot rears or the 16 inch alloys. The main difference is the front bar, rear pods and sideskirts.

Mine has no skirts and a fairly ordinary front bar, i know it isn't an Mspec because it has no body kit but it has every option that people claim are Mspec.

[eXc]

check here too

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...pe+G+sideskirts

[Cubes]

I like my front bar over others I have seen, it has the larger side intakes over some of the other smaller side intake's.

Type M's don't have a body kit, just the usual rear wing.

[mabru]

My chassis is a non-Mspec, the steering wheel was different, the meters have black backgrounds (not dark blue), the seats are different, had a different front bar, and it didn't have a VLSD.

-Matt