Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just requiring info on this build-up, wat is required to make them suit together and is it a good move, would i be expecting good performance.

Reason i ask this is because i can get them fairly cheap cheap, i've inspected them both, and there both in good order, no bad wear anywhere.

The Head is only an N/A Head, what is the difference between them and the turbo head.

Another thing, how do i prove it's an RB25 head and i don't have an RB20 Head

Cheers...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60276-rb25-head-rb30-bottom-end/
Share on other sites

if it came with the cam cover, it will say RB25 or RB20 but i assume its not otherwise you would have seen it already

but take a look here:

http://users.esc.net.au/~cobra30/twincam.htm

the bloke who did this rb30/25 conversion said that he knows the head to be rb25 because he injected oil into the combustion chamber using a syringe wich has cc measurments on it. So he just kepts track of how much he has injected and when its full you have the capacity, but that might not help either, because you won't be able to inject oil until you buy it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...