Jump to content
SAU Community

PC question

Silver-Arrowz

By Silver-Arrowz,
in PC & Games Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

NJR 34GTT Proficient

NJR 34GTT

Posted
Posted

Neither - The best socket for games has proven to be the socket 939 athlon 64s.

AGP or PCI express is a personal question you will have to decide upon yourself. PCI express is the new technology and it is debatable as to how long AGP is going to still be around. It won't be dissapearing tomorrow but it will be phased out in a few months?years?

In my opinion it would be best to wait a little bit for an nForce 4 motherboard with PCI express as none of the current socket 939 motherboards have pci-express available. This way you can upgrade your processor and video card down the track and still have an up-to-date system.

As for video card, this is an even tougher question. Around the $400 mark you are probably looking at either an older 9800pro(AGP) or a 6600GT(AGP or PCI X). I would suggest the 6600GT and see how you go with overclocking as they tend to have a bit of headroom depending on what latency RAM they come with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
riceline Community Regular

riceline

Posted
Posted

Hey mate

Sounds like you are trying to do a bit of a beast on a budget.

My system all up has cost me under 2K and its definaly not slow.

Athlon 3000+ 64bit (754 pin)

Abit KV8-Max 3 (uses the Via K8T8000 chipset - I prefer it to the NForce)

GeCube Radion 9600XT 256MB

1GB DDR400 Ram

2x SATA 120GB Western Digital 8mb Hard drives (Running Raid)

Pioneer DVD Burner

1x IDE 160GB WD 8mb Hdd (Backup)

There is nothing that I am unable to run (HL2 runs perfectly)

The way I see it PC parts are becoming very cheap to buy. So I have purchased this setup and it will do me for next 6months - 1year. That way PCI X is not quite as new. This should give them some time to figure out the bugs in the setup. At the moment the x800 AGP is still apx 10% Faster than the x800 PCIX. This includes the fact that PCIx runs at 16x and AGP is still running on 8x.

Get somthing for now and upgrade it later on when it is needed.

I am going to start looking at bigger video cards now. Not that I need to. I just want somthing faster again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
eXc Mentor

eXc

Posted
Posted

go the athlon 64 3000. if u can afford it get dual channel and dual ram to match.

Get RAM rated above the speed u need. Get a really good CPU fan, then overclock it to whatever the 3500 runs at (just watch the RAM speed doesn't exceed your rated RAM)

The 3000, 3200, and 3500 are essentially the SAME. They just change the mutliplyer in them, they are the same CPU, so if u get a 3000, u CAN go to 3500 without risking the CPU (Assumiung u have appropriate cooling) The problem is the new ones have locked multipliers, so you need to overclock via the system bus, so u overclock your RAM aswell, which is why u need to get fastter RAM.....

Of course if that is all to technical for you, just get an athlon 64, 3000 (or better) with 1gb of RAM and u'll be sweet.

Forget P4's for games. They still run everything, but the athlon kills them.

If you do alot of video editing etc however, I think it's the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NJR 34GTT Proficient

NJR 34GTT

Posted
Posted

Riceline: some corrections.

Firstly the X800 agp is faster because the core(430 off the top of my head?) is native AGP technology and uses a bridge chip to convert to PCI-X. Absolutely nothing to do with the "limitations" of PCI-X. The reverse is also found to be true, native PCI-X cards are faster than the versions using bridge chips to AGP - case in point 6600GT.

Secondly, the 16x and 8x doesn't mean squat, as no card is even coming close to maxing out the bandwidth available on AGP 8x. Nor will any card in the forseeable future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
someonestolecc Grand Master

someonestolecc

Posted
Posted

NJR knows what he's talkin bout.

Also someone mentioned dual channel RAM. As a rule I always use that and try to get the biggest cache on the chip.

The thing to remember when peicing your system together is that the bottlenecks should be as close as possible grouped together.

That is there is no point having a super dooper CPU when your motherboard/ram sucks (like most package deals I see advertised).

Likewise with the video cards (and with most things), I will always opt for the best of the older generation than the first of the new. This is simply a general rule I follow because mostly as things are already on the market there will be more support (eg linux/overclocking/drivers etc).

There may an exception with the 9800 based cards vs the 6600GT but I can't comment on this exactly as I'm not up on my video cards. Gave up long ago :D

Good luck :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lithium
      Boost level and torque curve

      By Lithium · Posted

      Right.  I'll try my best at a concise "bring you up to speed" on stuff that may be missing here - obviously open to questions or further input from others as relevant. Here's a datalog from a responsive turbo setup with electronic boost control being used a bit, to keep it simple I've marked 3 points of interest.  All of these charts are on the same time scale on the X-axis, so you can reference what engine rpm is doing in the top graph, boost and EMAP (exhaust backpressure) in the second graph, and turbo rpm in the bottom graph. A) The turbo gets it's power from exhaust gas, and pumping air takes work.  As a result you can't just spin a turbo with a fixed amount of exhaust energy and expect it to keep spooling - the bigger the turbo (ie, the more air it can push) the more exhaust energy you need to drive it.   The most obvious ways of getting more exhaust energy are by adding displacement, adding boost, or adding rpm - but as you add any of these the turbo also needs to do a bit more work so there is a big balance of these things needed to even get to your target boost and sometimes that's not even possible. What you can see in step "A" is that there isn't enough engine rpm or boost to reach the level we want, so this is where "lag" is.  The dyno run continues and rpm increases, which gives enough energy to increase boost, which helps spool  the turbine speed up even more - so you can see that the rate that the boost (and turbo speed) are starting to ramp up faster than the engine rpm is, so turbo is really starting to wake up as the graph gets closer to point B....   B) At this point we've been able to reach the boost that is actually desired at this point.   To stop the boost from going further than this the wastegate will open and bypass gas past the turbine, meaning it doesn't continue accelerating at the point it was before but instead carry on at a more progressive rate which matches what the engine needs.   The wastegate will have a spring in it which is rated to a specific pressure where it will start bypassing, but electronic boost control (managed by the ECU) can adjust how much pressure the spring sees in order to allow some tunability on how much boost the wastegate actually sees, and therefore how much exhaust it bypasses.   The tune in this case stops boost from ramping up HARD at around 21-22psi just before 4000rpm, then as the rpm continue it allows boost to continue up to around 25psi higher in the rpm.   You can see the turbo speed fairly steadily increases through the rpm to ensure it's keeping up with the increasing airflow demand due to the engine speed being higher and boost being pretty steady.   If the boost dropped off after a point then you may see the turbo speed level off or even drop.   C) You can see that despite the boost pressure staying pretty flat here, the exhaust pressure is steadily increasing and at this stage has overtaken boost pressure.   This isn't unusual, and is largely as a result of the increasing energy needed by the turbo to pump more and more air to suit the needs of the engine as it revs out further.   There are a bunch of variables in regards to how much back pressure there will be on a given turbo etc, but its one of the factors we manage when sizing and tuning a turbo setup.   When exhaust back pressure starts exceeding boost pressure you will eventually start seeing signs that the turbo is running out, the engine gets less keen to make more power and it gets harder to raise boost further. In this case it's a fairly acceptable compromise for the power level (around 630kw on a 3litre engine with full boost by 4000rpm), but you'd not want to push it a lot harder than this.  The maximum speed rated for the compressor wheel on this setup is around 125,000rpm so you can see its starting to get close on that side as well - I feel like this kind of illustrates some of the turbo related things we both decide on how far to push, and are also limited to how far we can push depending on the parts combination. Hope this helps more than it confuses things  
    • PranK
      Hello from the UK

      By PranK · Posted

      For that influx of Spammers we had I made no pic posting and no PM's for first ten posts. This is group based and I've manually updated @Beanie to the Members group which will open up the images and PM's. 
    • Ben Henry
      370gt Stock Suspension

      By Ben Henry · Posted

      Thx for the reassuring reply. I’ve got above legal clearance  going in for roadworthy Friday… fingers crossed it’s keeping me awake  bloody nanny state 
    • Lithium
      Boost level and torque curve

      By Lithium · Posted

      I was actually going to try and dig out a datalog with turbine speed and EMAP haha
    • GTSBoy
      Boost level and torque curve

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Wait until @Lithium posts a compressor map and tries to explain what's going on. There is a strong possibility that the OP lives in a digital world and is not comfortable with analogue machines. A turbo is just about as analogue as it gets, with plenty of non-linear behaviours added in on top. Most of us who think we know how they work are actually only getting by on 2nd and 3rd order mental models that abstract away from the actual physics and bring it back to the sort of kindergarten level concepts we can hold in our heads. This is important when you need to hold 10 such concepts in your head at the same time. You need to reduce the complexity of the individual concepts to allow them to be simultaneously held and manipulated. Too much complexity in the base models makes it very difficult to make them work with each other mentally.
×
×
  • Create New...