Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah, sounds like they're out of content again..  

how about an article on how to drift a Nissan Patrol??

:)

Yep-it's time to dredge up the "new GTR" in new photoshoped form again...Having said that,issue 18 of SPEED has a nice photo on page 17...piccie number 05,to be precise!

sorry man dont have a scanner... best i can do was take photos but they didnt come up to well with the glossy pages and the flash :thumbsup:

ive uploaded them to the gallery...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost...14IMG_00141.JPG - cover

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost...14IMG_00151.JPG - first page of article

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost...14IMG_00161.JPG - 2nd page

Oi SPEED!!!

SHOW US THE R+D PICS OF THE 'V8' FOR THE NEXT GT-R!!!

NO DICE???

DIDN'T THINK SO :thumbsup::P:p

I wish those knobs would stop perpetuating bullsh*t.

And I CANNOT BELIEVE they printed those ancient 'GT-Ah' Photochops... scraping the bottom of the barrel are we?

I have no respect for that rag.

Btw, HOW RIGHT WAS I??? They printed regurgitated info from my posts about the e-4WD and the electric spooled up turbos!!! Hahahaha ;)

Remember... you saw it in Speed... last!

Actually, I have been searching around and have found this new article highlighting the next GT-R which was just published the other day. Contains a very new photograph which I don't think I have seen before. Notice the agressive coupe styling of the rear, and the low coefficient of drag.

It says that apparently Nissan has had to work with a tight budget on the GT-R with the tight hand of Carlos Ghosn, so have unfortunately had to make some sacrifices along the way to meet fiscal targets. Personally, I think its a rather controversial move...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost...1332new_gtr.jpg

.

.

Actually, I have been searching around and have found this new article highlighting the next GT-R which was just published the other day. Contains a very new photograph which I don't think I have seen before. Notice the agressive coupe styling of the rear, and the low coefficient of drag.

It says that apparently Nissan has had to work with a tight budget on the GT-R with the tight hand of Carlos Ghosn, so have unfortunately had to make some sacrifices along the way to meet targets...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost...1332new_gtr.jpg

Oh. My. God. Bwahahahahahaha!!! :D Funniest thing I've seen all week... geez it's only Tuesday

oh my god... the first paragaph's a riot... lets paraphrase...

"its made by some dude in germany... he dosen't have any official links to nissan... but it looks so cool and its a photochop of all the popular ideas put together (including the 350z interior in the car)... so he must work for nissan... therefore its the next GTR"

People will publish anything for a quick buck these days.

Skylines aside, I think SPEED's journalistic integrity can be summed up on the last page of it's current issue. They go into a full rant bagging the old exa turbo, and have a picture of the NA CA18 EXA to a go a long with the article.

Not surprised though, learning to expect nothing less from this great publication

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...