Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah, sounds like they're out of content again..  

how about an article on how to drift a Nissan Patrol??

:)

Yep-it's time to dredge up the "new GTR" in new photoshoped form again...Having said that,issue 18 of SPEED has a nice photo on page 17...piccie number 05,to be precise!

sorry man dont have a scanner... best i can do was take photos but they didnt come up to well with the glossy pages and the flash :thumbsup:

ive uploaded them to the gallery...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost...14IMG_00141.JPG - cover

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost...14IMG_00151.JPG - first page of article

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost...14IMG_00161.JPG - 2nd page

Oi SPEED!!!

SHOW US THE R+D PICS OF THE 'V8' FOR THE NEXT GT-R!!!

NO DICE???

DIDN'T THINK SO :thumbsup::P:p

I wish those knobs would stop perpetuating bullsh*t.

And I CANNOT BELIEVE they printed those ancient 'GT-Ah' Photochops... scraping the bottom of the barrel are we?

I have no respect for that rag.

Btw, HOW RIGHT WAS I??? They printed regurgitated info from my posts about the e-4WD and the electric spooled up turbos!!! Hahahaha ;)

Remember... you saw it in Speed... last!

Actually, I have been searching around and have found this new article highlighting the next GT-R which was just published the other day. Contains a very new photograph which I don't think I have seen before. Notice the agressive coupe styling of the rear, and the low coefficient of drag.

It says that apparently Nissan has had to work with a tight budget on the GT-R with the tight hand of Carlos Ghosn, so have unfortunately had to make some sacrifices along the way to meet fiscal targets. Personally, I think its a rather controversial move...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost...1332new_gtr.jpg

.

.

Actually, I have been searching around and have found this new article highlighting the next GT-R which was just published the other day. Contains a very new photograph which I don't think I have seen before. Notice the agressive coupe styling of the rear, and the low coefficient of drag.

It says that apparently Nissan has had to work with a tight budget on the GT-R with the tight hand of Carlos Ghosn, so have unfortunately had to make some sacrifices along the way to meet targets...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/photopost...1332new_gtr.jpg

Oh. My. God. Bwahahahahahaha!!! :D Funniest thing I've seen all week... geez it's only Tuesday

oh my god... the first paragaph's a riot... lets paraphrase...

"its made by some dude in germany... he dosen't have any official links to nissan... but it looks so cool and its a photochop of all the popular ideas put together (including the 350z interior in the car)... so he must work for nissan... therefore its the next GTR"

People will publish anything for a quick buck these days.

Skylines aside, I think SPEED's journalistic integrity can be summed up on the last page of it's current issue. They go into a full rant bagging the old exa turbo, and have a picture of the NA CA18 EXA to a go a long with the article.

Not surprised though, learning to expect nothing less from this great publication

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...