Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just put the r31 on the dyno

stock computer, stockinjectors, engine capacity is 2.656 litres

on 1 bar of boost and the stock computer running 10:1 fuel made a cruzy 260-70 rwkw before the injectors run out of puff

hits boost hard at 3500 and full steam ahead at 4500

was on a dyno dynamics dyno at autosport engineer in kirawee mst have been about 30 degrees.. thats all i can add

very drivable and im very happy cant wait to get some injectors and turn it up to 20 psi and rev her out to 9k

done

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61398-xr6t-turbo-powered/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

These XR6t turbo's are looking more and more interesting.

On the 3ltr I would hope the spool would drop to around 3000rpm.

With a 1.06 exhaust a/r or what ever it is.. Thats damn good response.. How can it be?

BUT.. What exactly do you mean by Full steam ahead by 4500rpm?

Boost hits hard at 3500rpm but it doesn't accelerate or punch you in the seat until 4500rpm? :(

They most certainly are , identical core as GT35R or known by some as the GT3540R . 56 trim 82mm GT40 compressor , 84 trim 68mm GT35 turbine .

The unique thing with this turbocharger (apart from the integral gate) is its .50AR TO4E comp cover , possibly optioned to feed 4L at low boost and have good response .

For anyone interested GCG is tooling up to make a .63AR integral gate exhaust housing for GT35R's as part of a low boost kit in the wings .

I will probably option mine with a .60 E comp cover and 82 or 1.06 turbine housing .

never had the old twin turbo setup on he dyno but at 1.2 bar it had less power than the xr6t cruzing at 15psi

ye its a big furker that is for sure

runs like this

2000 rpm .2 bar

3000rpm .2 bar

3500 rpm climbing

4000 .6 bar(starting to hammer)

full boost or whatever you set it at at 4800 and power jumps to about 240rwkw

makes some great power and has the big single sound

downside is

the cat i have has killed itself so ill replace it with a proper high flow one

What kind of tuning has it had done? DOes it have Cams/Cam gears?

I run the same power from my RB26 1bar stock turbos, stock ecu, stock injectors.

tunning nothing just a run on the dyno to check that its not pinging and has enough fuel

im going to get some cam gears cause that will bring it on apparently

he picked it up off a m8 for 1000bucks the bugga! lol

mostly see them go for average 1500 to 2000bucks........ to buy them new from ford u'll be up for nearly 3000 i think from memory.

Drama is actually getting one is difficult ....a) how many ford turbo owners upgrade theyre turbo? B) finding a wrecked one at a wrecker that doesnt want big bucks for it.....

Matt

am interested to whats the XR6T turbo is made from obviosly not a ceramic one how much boost can you run on those trubos what the size diff between a rb25 turbo and the falcon one???, how much work needs to be done on it to fit??

i dropped the car at tripple g (call glen on 0403606314)

took him a couple of days to do the entire instal

he might be making a jig of the manifold to sell a few xr6t kits

it has steel wheels so once i have injectors ill turn it up to 20psi

compared to a rb25 tubo i would say its 3 times the size

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
    • Messing with narrowband switchovers is a terrible bandaid. I don't want to think about it. You are a cam "upgrader" only in concept. As you said, your new cam is actually smaller, so it's technically a downgrade. OK, likely a very small downgrade, but nevertheless. But the big thing that will be the most likely suspect is the change of the advance angle. That change could be equivalent to a substantial decrease in cam lobe duration. I haven't gone to the effort of trying to think about what your change would actually cause. But until someone (you, me (unlikely), Matt, someone else) does so and comes to a conclusion about the effect, it remains a possibility that that is the change that is causing what you're seeing.
    • The previous switchover point was 501mv. The stock value is like ~360. They now were idling at about ~880. The thing is, most people get a false lean condition. I am getting false rich conditions. This isn't a quirk of terminology, most cam upgraders get awful fuel economy because the O2's read false lean and add fuel - Mine are attempting to aggressively subtract fuel.
    • So... the whole idea was to upgrade the power of the motor from stock. The motor I bought with the gearbox had 'some' stuff done to it in the past, but it wasn't as well thought out/what I had wanted to do. The stock heads typically are a big restriction on LS's and need porting to unlock quite a lot of power. You can then go a bit silly with aftermarket castings to get more, aftermarket intake manifolds for a little more, and then porting those for more. <- We are here. Nobody in Australia really goes down this path (for some reason). It might* make 3kw or something more than doing things the tried and true path for 10X the cost. So that's probably why - I wouldn't even recommend it to people, the money was and is likely better spent on just CNC'ing the stock heads and putting a 6.3L stroker kit in. I didn't want to go down the 'normal' path and then think: But if I'd just done a bit more - I could have had a slightly better result. I assumed the heads were running out of flow and it always annoyed me - Turns out the previous installer advanced the cam 6 degrees so this is likely why it was coming on earlier and running out of puff earlier than advertised. The body panels were just lack of planning/no information on this anywhere on the internet and the fact they came out different was annoying. From test fitting the guard it appears I could have gotten away with GTR guards only, but I got the bonnet and raisers and everything else as well for a pretty decent package deal.
×
×
  • Create New...