Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Was thinking about the plain bearing turbo that i currently run, or shoudl i say sits in thr boot of my car:(

Spinning the compressor / turbine you get a feel for the difference between it and some the HKS turbos i have seen, namely 2835/3040 & T51.

But i got to thinking the fact that its not installed and running on the car, hence has no oil pressure around the bearing... is spinning the turbine whilst the thing is in your hand indicative of the sort of friction/resistance in this sort of bearing setup?

Or once they have pressurised oil in their core do they spin easier. I guess im thinking they would spin easier, but i aint really sure...anyoen stripped a plain bearing turbo and have a good idea of the lubricated faces / oil films in the core?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61429-turbo-bearing-ques/
Share on other sites

its about 10,000 times easier with oil pressure. As ylwgtr2 says, when there is oil pressure there is no contact between the bronze bearing and the housing, and no contact between the shaft and the bearing.

I have one in my fingers right now.

Pull it apart very carefully for yourself, thats the best way to learn about things.

Make sure you have clean hands and clean everything with petrol, then add oil when you put it back together.

Yeh ive seen the inside of an old CA18 turbo with only a 270deg bearing etc. But its pretty hard to suss out just how easily the shaft spins with oil pressure as opposed to when sitting in your hand.

Anyway, i guess my answer the difference is dramatic, so thanks

when i was installing the gcg high flow tubby, i span the wheels, and they didnt really feel that free rolling, however, now its in the car, i can hear the turbo spin down for about 5-8 seconds when you turn off the engine ... the plain bearing did not do this ! i can only put it down to the free rolling now the turbo has oil in it !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...