Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i don't think it will be a interesting matchup. The V8 supercar will win without a hard time.

We are talking a loads of R&D invloved today technology V8 super car and a local jap turner's car which built at least a few years ago.

not to mention GT500, is top secrect racing in GT300 now? from my memory - no...

BTW the power/weight ratio is so close, a N/A will always shit on a turbo due to response.

Think about in 90" the F1 already get 1400hp turbo engine, and they swap it to a 1/2 power output N/A V10 afterward for response...

its like comparing apples to oranges..... settle down children

btw this thread was showing u a car, not "which car would win"

btw im sure this supra would beat a v8 supercar on an oval track :mad: ... once again apples and oranges

The car he was fined in was the 0-300 Supra with the RB26, this is the GT 300 Pro Supra

But don't you think during R&D they would know that? Do yo think they just went "hmmmm what have we got laying around"?

As for the extra injectors, a large number of fuel rails eg - Greddy support 2 sets and require extra injectors to pulg the holes, whats wrong with that?

Some info -

GT300 SUPRA

Vehicle: '98 Top Secret GT-300 Toyota Supra

Engine: Toyota 3S-GTE four-cylinder, 2.2-litres

Induction: Trust T88 34D turbocharger, 100mm Veilside throttle-body, custom intake manifold/ plenum chamber, Trust type C external wastegate, Trust Profec B EBC, max 1.8bar boost (26psi), Trust three-row air-to-air intercooler, four auxiliary injectors

Internals: Top Secret ported head, HKS metal head gasket, HKS grind cams, HKS adjustable pulleys, heavy duty cam belt, Garage ***ui stroker crank, Garage ***ui stroker rods, Garage ***ui 2.2-litre pistons

Ignition: HKS F-CON V Pro ECU piggy-back

Exhaust: Top Secret custom-made 50mm tube manifold, Top Secret Titan Pro 100 four-inch exhaust system

Drivetrain

Gearbox: Getrag six-speed H-pattern

Differential: TRD LSD

Clutch: OS Giken triple plate

Brakes: 355mm Trust rotors, Alcon four-piston calipers

Wheels & Tires

Front & Rear: (f) 19x9.5 Rays Volk TE85, 255/35 Yokohama Advan Neovas, ® 19x10.5 Rays Volk TE85, 275/35 Yokohama Advan Neovas

Power Output: 530kW @ 8500rpm

Quarter Mile: N/A

Background: The car's inspiration came from JGTC. The cars performance, however, became an inspiration for many to follow. The body design is completely original by Mr. Nagata, himself as is all the tuning. The car was used in many high speed trials and competitions. The smaller and lighter 3SGTE engine is set back far enough for the car to be considered to be a MR layout vehicle and for the front radiator to be mounted totally flat in the engine bay.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...