Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The speakers wont transfer as much energy through the wood, which means they are more likely to convert the power delivered into actual sound rather than movement and rattles. Basically the stronger the mount/enclousure, the better the sound.

i agree with this to a point.

if you think its annoying installing 6 inches into the parcel shelf try and imagine what it was like installing 6-9's.! It was totally amazing it took me 2 days of cutting myself and the parcel shelf..

Why didn't you just make a new parcel shelf out of 15-18mm MDF?? Would have been a lot easier plus if all the theories about wood is correct wouldn't it sound better?

making a new parcel shelf? nah probably would have been just as difficult if not more? then id have to deal with all the computer underneath......

im not sure if this theory is really that great... im yet still to see any major proof..

Guest GR33DyMANGO
Originally posted by akeenan

 

making a new parcel shelf? nah probably would have been just as difficult if not more? then id have to deal with all the computer underneath......

im not sure if this theory is really that great... im yet still to see any major proof..

making a parcel shelf is REALLY easy. all u do is take out the old shelf. place it ontop of some 15mm mdf sheeting and trace around it. then jigsaw out the shape of the new shelf. cuts holes for speakers and screw holes. glue carpet ontop (get from any car audio shop) ... and put back in.. its way too easy:)

That's exactly what I did.

And using MDF made a SHITLOAD of difference to the sound.

The wood brings out the mid-range and bass due to the strength of the material not absorbing these frequencies.

I had 7x10" Kenwoods mounted straight into the shelf to start with. After a while I took them out and made a new MDF shelf and mounted the speakers into it.

After doing that I'd never have a rear shelf not made out of MDF.

Try it ... you won't go back :cool:

And its very easy to do.

Try it ... you won't go back

nah too much trouble!,

oh i had to take my door trimmings off today and just to clarify a few things

1.) the holes in the doors of a series one skyline are made for 6.5 inch speakers!

2.) i have 6 inch speakers in my front but i have 2 different types of holes.

holes in the actual ring of the speaker and then holes poking out from the speaker to make it larger...(if this makes sense)

as i said all along! :P

Why would you want to put speakers in the back anyway?

Your whole sound stage will be screwed, especially if you put bigger(louder) speakers in the back.

I have a set of splits and a sub. Bass is non directional and will only fit in the boot. You want all of your music to come from the front, not from behind you. I reckon this is all you need. By a few GOOD things rather than lots of shit.

Do you go to a concert and face the back so all the sound comes from behind? I think not.

Those who posted their theories on wood in spacers are right. It will resonate less, therefore absorbing less energy from the drivers and sounding fatter and deeper. This will go for a parcel shelf too if you decide that you need rears. A MDF parcel shelf will sound heaps better than the thin bit already there.

Oh, and if you think 6x9's are the shit you should trade in your Skyline and get a WRexcel.

And if you think I don't know what I'm talking about, have a look at my posts here for pic of my previous car.

Oh, and if you think 6x9's are the shit you should trade in your Skyline and get a WRexcel.  

that was a pretty full on post!

are you having a dig at me here?

about my 6'9's?

as for speakers on in the front(i agree with this) but what if you have passengers in the back? it would sound pretty poor

what is the purpose of surround sound?

I am trying to the best quality sound from the middle of my car to satisfy the front and the rear seats

I worked at a major car sound retailer for 3 years and we did a couple of 'lines, including mine. From memory they were series 1's. Front and rear are definitely 6.5"s, I have 6" polks in the front and have had to make up MDF spacers to make them fit.

Although the front speakers are your main stage, I think you should run rear speakers as fill only as they can really beef up your mid base. By that I mean fade them all the way out and then bring them back in until you can just hear the mids fattening up. Well that's my opinion anyway

My 2c's:D

I agree Kik-ass.

Adding some rear fill can give you a great effect, and you tend to feel more "surrounded" by sound.

On the other hand, i love the simplicity of some tuff splits up front and a phat sub in the boot. Easy to put together, no stuffing around with fades.

One question id like to put forward to any experienced audiophiles-

Ive had systems with rear speakers in the shelf and a sub in the boot, and the resulting pressure changes in the boot completely distorted the shelf speakers! ie the cones were reacting to the pressure from the sub.

I find that leaving the rear speaker holes empty (covered with a grill) the subb works and sounds better. -im not talking about hatches. Anyone else have this problem in a line? as i havent put in my sub yet. I did notice some vents toward the rear of the shelf that communicate with the cabin air though.

Making a parcel shelf isn't too hard... you just measure it up and start cutting. Then you can go get some velour or some other nice material to go over the top matching the interior colour. Go to spotlight or some raw materials shop to get it, its like $5 a meter or something cheap - you'll feel like a girl, but hey. A friend once *had* to do it because he ripped his getting his old one out :O The results are pretty cool actually, better than the standard one if you do a good job.

Makes sense, more solid surface makes for less vibration and less distortion and other things. Hence why your speakers at home are made of decent thickness wood (or plastic for cheap ones, erk), and not thin metal . Same with subby boxes, the standard boxes look pretty bodgy to me - best off making your own out of some decent sized wood.

Of course all this heavy wood stuff ads to the weight of the car.. you could always just rip the back seat out though instead :O Or maybe you could make yourself some spiffy wooden wheels to match... ok, i'm getting silly now

i have 6X9's in 6inch three ways in the front and alpin esubs in the boot my sound comes not only from the front but all around if I wanted to listen to a band id buy a ticket and go see them in my opinion id rather quilty than the direction fo the sound

soz abou tthe mistakes i was pissed when i wrote this

Originally posted by Mud

Why would you want to put speakers in the back anyway?

Your whole sound stage will be screwed, especially if you put bigger(louder) speakers in the back.

Oh, and if you think 6x9's are the shit you should trade in your Skyline and get a WRexcel.

And if you think I don't know what I'm talking about, have a look at my posts here for pic of my previous car.

6x9s are only good if you want loudness (because of the bigger surface area of the cone), so are shit. Round speakers wil ALWAYS sound better for the simple fact that they are indeed round. Sound travels in a spherical form, not an oval one.

You need at least some rear fill. I agree that it sould not be as much as the front stage but it has to be there. Stereos with a big sub(s) and only a pair of splits sound over bassed most of the time because the splits simply cant move enough air to keep up with the sub.

Finally, no ones doubting your knowledge on car audio, you probably just have a different taste for sound than some of us.... by the way, some of us here my know a thing or too as well :cool:

You need at least some rear fill. I agree that it sould not be as much as the front stage but it has to be there. Stereos with a big sub(s) and only a pair of splits sound over bassed most of the time because the splits simply cant move enough air to keep up with the sub.

I definitely agree there... there has to be a reasonable balance there. While bass is omni-directional, you still need the balance there with some higher freq in the back as well.

I've heard the difference - 4 matched speakers give a much "fuller" sound stage..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reasonably hard, although I haven't run it with the new Endless setup yet. The old brakes were F50's on 335mm rotors and the car did a 1:40.6 at Phillip Island which is a reasonable time, I'm seeing high 600s on the temperature paint. A guy I know ran the Endless fluid at WTAC without issues and he was doing 1:33's I think (Evo) with a 355/332 setup. I don't get out to the track as much as I'd like but we put the car on the hoist and spanner check every bolt and re-paint mark everything, bleed the brakes, change the fuel, check the coolant system and re-bleed blah blah blah before every event. Motorsport is expensive, RB's are expensive so a couple of hours before an event is time well spent. It's also a net time saving because if you can keep your RB from self destructing it saves you time in the long term!
    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
×
×
  • Create New...