Jump to content
SAU Community

  

160 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Things have changed again and the time has come to let that car go - it's approaching 150k kms, services are costing me heaps and it does 15/16L per 100km when I drive it around (and I drive a lot).

u need an r31 .. spent $100 on servicing last year.. gets 12L/100.. runs a treat and its 19 years old :(

none of those in the list u posted above.. but only because i like to have something a little different. If you want something a "little more sporty" is any of them really going to cut the cake for long? in 12 months, you'll probably be after something else faster again..

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's true none of them are performace cars, but..........

By far the Mazda 3 SP23 is the best of the smaller car range, followed by the Holden Astra then the Subaru RX.

Don't even both looking at the Honda Jazz that just ridiculous to compare them to any of these cars and the pulasr is good without being outstanding in any field. It's just not the best valued samller car on the market.

Nobody can really tell you what car to buy, it's really a personal desicion. I myself am in the middle of getting a new car. I am currently driving my g/f Astra. It's a very good little car and does the job it was made to do, it's economical and has the power to get to the speed limit and can handle a full load of passengers with the air-con on full and still doens't struggle.

Having said that the SP23 is the most sporty version of any car in that range and as such is head and shoulders above the rest. No real cons about the car, the fact it's front wheel drive is basically irrelivant because not many car manafacures make small cars that are rear wheel drive. This just might be your preference.

If you want a car to make noise get either a Mazda 6 or Holden Vectra they both use small engines still but slightly better on the models down and also come with alot more for your money and they also come in under 30k.

Good Luck

I wouldn't say the SP23 is heads and shoulders above the rest:

SP23 - 2.3L / 115kw / 203nm / FWD

Impreza RS - 2.5L / 112kw / 223nm / AWD

Basically the same interior space and features. As for an Astra, as much as I do like them it's a Holden.

i voted sub, mate just bought a 2nd hand RS sedan, its not to bad, (i dont like the look of them) but for what you want, it drives pretty nice and grips the road.

I'd go for a 2002 model B4 - they were 60k new, you can pick them up now for about 30k.. my mate owns one who i car pool with to work, it handles well, has a bit of go when you need it, and, has 4 doors, full leather interior... When i get over the GTR i'll definatly be looking at one or the new GT... (If i can't afford my M3) :cheers:

Aren't they made in germany by Opel and rebadged as Holden's for the Australian market?

I think they are actually made in germany, but yes holden don't "actually" make them. You can dismiss a car just because it's made by 1 company if you are after best value for money.

Just comparing the power and torque cars have they are very much similar, but start to take into account the actually running cost of the car. Inlude full services and so on and when you buy a subaru you pay through the nose for it. Even the NRMA agree the Mazda is cheaper to run while having more standard features than any other car in its class, that's why they said it was 'Best small medium car or the year".

I agree with 08Elf.... you must also consider the long run costs of the car.... How much is each 10k service, when do things needs to be replaced.... tyre sizes/costs.... fuel economy....

further more you have to consider the comfort factors like the interior finishes... what you can and cannot change... space practicality (remember the r33 boots) You should really consider a test drive with your fiance, if you haven't already done so... (Girls need to be comfortable with what they drive, and I think we guys can get used to driving anything)

I personally prefer subarus.... because I borrow my friend's subby to go on the beaches every now and then.

I am really thinking about hand my skyline to my little bro in 3yrs time, so I can get a subaru (probably a liberty though, which has higher maintanance cost than imprezas)

It's definitely not an easy choice between the RS and SP23. I am still swaying towards the RS though - mainly for the AWD (safety, traction, cornering etc.) and I personally feel it will be more fun. I'm not too worried about the servicing costs.

It's definitely not an easy choice between the RS and SP23. I am still swaying towards the RS though - mainly for the AWD (safety, traction, cornering etc.) and I personally feel it will be more fun. I'm not too worried about the servicing costs.

How can you say no to 4WD (especially vs FF)?

Hi Greg,

While my car was getting the gearbox fixed, I had a Pulsar ST for a few days, its easy to drive, gets great fuel economy, easy to park, etc. Great little car, in fact the only negative thing I can say about it is that it gets a bit scary when you take up to 160 km/h, but otherwise its fine

-Sam

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meanwhile, 20+ years ago, I pulled out the 105mm hole saw and went straight down through the inner guard in front of the airbox to get my stormwater pipe cold air intake in. Right behind the two stock holes for the intercooler pipes. Those have no reinforcement (apart from a couple of robust pieces of steel pipe through them!). I feel that the Australian vehicle standards crews put way too much emphasis on "maintaining the crash performance" of cars and not enough consideration of "any crash is a new and wonderful experiment with a random selection of parameters and you will never be able to tell if an extra 80mm hole through some sheet metal caused a significant difference...but if you close your eyes and squint at the whole structure, engage your engineering brain and have a good think about it, you'd have to expect that it would do jack all."
    • You guys are focussing on the wrong part of this post and have headed off on an irrelevant tangent!  Clearly I'm not going to put my most prized physical possession (well it will be once I'm finished it...) on a piece of shit contraption that might fail and crush me or my car!  At no point was that even implied I was trying to buy a butchered P.O.S that some shonky clown had thrown together with a gasless MIG....  Either way I would love to see the build quality of a rotisserie that has failed.  Actually I'd love to see a photo of one that has failed full stop.  Google fails to deliver.  Never happened?? I'll either make one that won't fail or will buy one that wouldn't fail! End Post.....
    • Yeah, if you can't breathe for more than about 2 minutes, you're cooked.
    • Well, all the power should be getting dissipated across the starter motor. Therefore, ideally, the voltage drop across the earth lead should be convincingly close to zero. Certainly you'd want it to be only a volt or so at max, because otherwise that volt doesn't turn up at the starter to do what is required. A car can probably survive a bad enough earth to crank and start with only 9V or so at the starter motor, maybe even a bit less. But you're seeing only 8V at the battery terminals when cranking, so there can't even be that much available over at the starter, which simply won't do. I would have thought that you couldn't pull enough current (with a healthy starter) to make the battery drop to 8V locally. But I was ignoring the possibility that the starter is in fact crook. If it has shorted windings (or maybe the solenoid is borked and shorting to earth) then I guess it could pull a stack of current and not even look like wanting to turn over. So follow the other boys' reccos too. Because they are just as likely at this point.  
    • Depending where the whole gets drilled, and what country/state you're talking about, quite likely not.   Under ole vehicle mod rules in NSW, VSI06 allowed for drilling of holes in "non structural" areas. So you could drill a hole through the inner guard, and not need engineering. You couldn't drill over seams, and it was advised to add extra reinforcing around the hole, as well as something to protect from sharp edges.   Again, it's all about finding the documentation for where the mod is to be done, AND then being able to explain the situation, with the documentation as to why you don't need engineering, with a positive attitude, to any one of the likes eg, police, vehicle inspector, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...