Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guyz just a quick question

wats the average fuel consumption for a 1989 r32 gts4 for a full tank

just drivin normal not pushing it constantly

how many km/s should i be gettin out of a tank (AVERAGE)

i need to kno coz this thing is drinkin heaps!

thx

joe

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63059-fuel-consumption-for-r32/
Share on other sites

i get about 440 to a tank of premium unleaded from mobil or bp.. is your car stock or is it modified heaps? i have 200,000 on the clock and its still running like a dream. have front mount, pod, exhaust, bov ( atmo ) and 500hp fuel pump.

I have a cefiro, so slightly heavier than a normal skyline, but prob about the same as a gts4. And say I go down the coast on a sat nite, drive to work in traffic the rest of the time, Id get about 490-570kms to a tank, then I fill up and only 55L goes in. So work it out. I dont baby the car, but where theres no point in giving it a bit I wont.

So personally I think you lot need better tunes :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does that price include the rack time to straighten the frame and body and replacement of parts and paint, as well as the noise and emmisions testing  The last engineering certificate I had done, albeit about 15 years ago, was around $1000 for a few inspections and the certificate 
    • 😂 thanks guys. The diagram i had did not have the breather on it at all. Much appreciated.  
    • Geez, engineers fees have definitely gone up. Mine back 2007 cost me all of $300. Mind you, I had to go back to him a few times to get him to write the correct things on the report after he'd inspected it. Things like wrong exhaust size, wrong wheel sizes, etc etc.
    • Can we see a scan of the original quote? The problem with engineers (and by this, I mean, all engineers across all engineering industries) is that there are "engineers" and there are "engineers" (you'll have to imagine the two different vocal emphases on those two versions of the same word. Engineering is a mindset - your farm kid who spent his life rebuilding the tractor will likely make a good engineer. The farm kid who spent his life taking photos of butterflies.. perhaps not. But on top of that mindset, the modern engineer has to learn how to write so that there is absolutely no way of being misunderstood. Proposals/budget estimates/quotations are one place where this is absolutely vital. You have to delineate your scope of supply with extremely hard boundaries, and anywhere where there is any possibility of not being able to have such a hard boundary, you need to write language that will cover you from scope creep, cost overruns, the inevitable interference of the client or their "engineer", etc etc. Now, if your clients are the BHPs and the Rio Tintos of the world, and similar, then you get good at this. If you are an automotive engineer, pitching work to the great unwashed masses, your skills in this area might not be well developed, because you're only dealing with knuckle draggers trying to get a big block legal in a Torana. And when I say "might not"....I'd suggest there's a better than even chance that any such skills might be completely absent. So, we might be able to look at your quote and see what the opportunities are for rebuttal.
×
×
  • Create New...