Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I got my powerfc tuned today and after giving it a hard flogging on the way home to see if it there was any knocking/detonation or bad stuff it all seemed fine. i checked the max values on the hand controller and saw

Afm 5023mv

Injector duty 92%

Knocking 18

This was after a few 3rd gear runs to redline. I didn't get the engine flash light come up to warn of knock so I guess this is safe? It got 172rwkw on dyno dynamics not in shoot out mode. I did some searching and I was sure afm wouldn't max out at this rwkw/power level. I found a thread (http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ight=afm+maxing) and it looks like he had a similar scenario. I'll go check what the mv afm value is at idle.

Anyone able to assure me stuff is ok or is it time for new afm / injectors already?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63115-powerc-tune-are-these-results-safeok/
Share on other sites

Hi Paul, don't stress over the max values, they are a flash reading at a single point in time. What you are looking for is ongoing readings. The individual items;

1. Knock shouldn't go over 40, so 18 is OK.

2. Injector duty could be as a result of acceleration enrichment, don't stress until you see 90%+ holding constant speed. (ie; not accelerating).

3. AFM readings, ditto, don't stress until you see 5.1 volts when holding constant speed. (ie; not during rapid boost build).

:P

afm are right up that (5.134 v i think is max) so your like 98% of fsd

92% injector ok but again quiet high (most people like under 90%)

knock not a problem (even 30 or so is fine normally background noise) i believe 40 to 50 onwards is where you should start to worry

only my opinion

be careful shouldn't be a problem but look to upgrade down the road tho

Hi Paul, don't stress over the max values, they are a flash reading at a single point in time.  What you are looking for is ongoing readings.  The individual items;

1. Knock shouldn't go over 40, so 18 is OK.

2. Injector duty could be as a result of acceleration enrichment, don't stress until you see 90%+ holding constant speed. (ie; not accelerating).

3. AFM readings, ditto, don't stress until you see 5.1 volts when holding constant speed. (ie; not during rapid boost build).

:D

1/. Knock is engine and sensor dependant. No one can give you a safe figure, it will all depend on your particular engine and its idiosyncrasies.

2/. Injector duty at 92% means it hit 92% when the engine required 92%. Get larger injectors.

3/. Your AFM's are maxed out. Get larger AFM's - transient spikes? WTF? If the AFM recorded 5.1v (voltage ceiling) it means that more than the maximum amount of air able to be measured was being ingested by the engine - even a spike means that the Power FC didn't know for that period just how much air was present, so the engine would have run lean if the injectors couldn't dump enough to cover it - and which in his case, it couldn't do, as his injectors are reading 92%.

Maxed injectors and AFM's is a sure fire way to destroy an engine.

My suggestion to the original poster is to upgrade his fuel system and AFM's, or run lower boost until he can do them.

Mario.

Yeh about knock level, my car gets into the 30-40s under load from time to time. My understanding is that this is fine. But say cruising at 80km in 4th gear...when i slow on trailing throttle is will occassionaly spike...problem is when hititng peak i cant be sure whether that peak reading was whilst under load or not:(

Does anyone know if the voltage signal that the PFc uses for knock detection is a linear signal?

2/.  Injector duty at 92% means it hit 92% when the engine required 92%.  Get larger injectors.

3/.  Your AFM's are maxed out.  Get larger AFM's - transient spikes?  WTF?  If the AFM recorded 5.1v (voltage ceiling) it means that more than the maximum amount of air able to be measured was being ingested by the engine - even a spike means that the Power FC didn't know for that period just how much air was present, so the engine would have run lean if the injectors couldn't dump enough to cover it - and which in his case, it couldn't do, as his injectors are reading 92%.

Maxed injectors and AFM's is a sure fire way to destroy an engine.

My suggestion to the original poster is to upgrade his fuel system and AFM's, or run lower boost until he can do them.

As much as I respect SydneyKids knowledge and experience, I agree much more with these comments. What if there is an extra extra unexpected variable? 5.1v could mean that just over the AFMs max air came in, or maybe there was 25% more.... or maybe it was right on the limit this time, but maybe another time it could go higher over that and it'll still get the same amount of fuel.

I'd definately turn the boost down in the mean time.

But if the thing has been tuned with a wide band lambda up its bum then surely the injector duty cycle has been set do that irrespective of the AFM volatage, boost/cfm etc the A/F will be fine.

Ok so its not perfect, but it shouldnt be too large a concern as far as balls to the wall driving. Id grab a Z32 etc as well, but from a performance aspect they wont make any difference, from an economy and driveability it would likely make a difference as it woudl make the thuners life easier....or am i way off base:)

But if the thing has been tuned with a wide band lambda up its bum then surely the injector duty cycle has been set do that irrespective of the AFM volatage, boost/cfm etc the A/F will be fine.

Ok so its not perfect, but it shouldnt be too large a concern as far as balls to the wall driving. Id grab a Z32 etc as well, but from a performance aspect they wont make any difference, from an economy and driveability it would likely make a difference as it woudl make the thuners life easier....or am i way off base:)

I agree with Roy to an extent. If your tuner maxed out your AFM on the Dyno then he would know the load point on the fuel map where it occured. This means that at that Max out point the fuel grid would flat line from left to right. If you know this flat line point then you can "guess" how much fuel will be needed after the max out point by following the pattern of duty increases from bofore the AFM Max out. Just to be safe you add a little more fuel to each cell after the flat line which means at full boost when you max out your afm you might be running a little rich...

I should say that I think this is only possible with a standard turbo setup due to the linier boost curve, as a steady curve allows you to guesstamate load after a AFM Max out. Turbos with a steap boost curve are harder to predict.

My 2 cents :)

The injector duty depends on what the tuner set the injector duty at. If he set it up as say 80%, then a reading of 92% on the handconroller is only really 0.92 x 80% = 73.6%.

You can check this by looking it the injector settings (if your tuner didn't lock your handcontroller)

The injector duty depends on what the tuner set the injector duty at. If he set it up as say 80%, then a reading of 92% on the handconroller is only really 0.92 x 80% = 73.6%.  

Not quite mate,

The correction on the injector menu is to accomodate aftermarket injectors.

If you have 550 cc injectors, the correction value is %80.

The duty cycle will still read correct, if it shows %92, that means your 550cc injectors are operating @ %92 = 506cc of flow.

GunMetal,

The hand controller can be locked with a laptop software.

It would still monitor, but you wouldnt be able to see and change any parameters on the settings menu.

Well, some tuners may see it as their own propety, even though you are paying for the tune. Best is to check before proceeding even though it's not very common.

It would also stop curious fingers playing with the settings just to see what it does.

Worst case scenario is when the cars change ownership; I've read about a couple of dramas in the past.

just got mine installed today, didn't notive the AFM voltage but i did notice that in second gear at 6900rpm my injectors hit 99.6%.........so basically this is saying i should turn the boost down or........... would a bigger fuel pump do the job ??? the car is running upto 14psi at the moment...i don't mind losing some boost for some safety, would i need a fuel reg or sumthin with a bigger pump.....where do i go from here.

also its not fully tuned at the moment, will that make a difference ?

just got mine installed today, didn't notive the AFM voltage but i did notice that in second gear at 6900rpm my injectors hit 99.6%.........so basically this is saying i should turn the boost down or........... would a bigger fuel pump do the job ??? the car is running upto 14psi at the moment...i don't mind losing some boost for some safety, would i need a fuel reg or sumthin with a bigger pump.....where do i go from here.

also its not fully tuned at the moment, will that make a difference ?

You need big injectors

( a pump and reg can help get a bit more out off injectors but its like a band aid solution ,injector are quiet cheap my 700cc sard were $115ea)

and you may need pump to go with it depending on how far you want to go and the std system in place ablilties (is this gtr,gts or something else)

plus i would think you would be very close to afms maxing out ,if your maxing injectors and i would recomend doing a peak hold next time you give it a good boot full to see how high the afms volts are going. Upgrade for gtr are the rb20/25 80mm afms at about 150ea second hand and the gts is the Z32 80mm afm that can be bought through Repco (std bosch part)with plug I guess for around $400 dollars(i got cheaper but a friend worked there)

hope this help

yeah sorry its a gts-t. do many other people have this problem, i don't really have $700 for injectors + pump + reg + everything else, i just don't have it, me tihnks lower boost will be only go for now

but...how do u do this peak hold thing u speak of, is that where the little black boxes appear on the side which hold peak values ???

also, does anyone have a pfc manual, cause i have no idea how to read those graphs, and is there anyway to review them, say after a drag ???

I agree with Roy to an extent. If your tuner maxed out your AFM on the Dyno then he would know the load point on the fuel map where it occured. This means that at that Max out point the fuel grid would flat line from left to right. If you know this flat line point then you can "guess" how much fuel will be needed after the max out point by following the pattern of duty increases from bofore the AFM Max out. Just to be safe you add a little more fuel to each cell after the flat line which means at full boost when you max out your afm you might be running a little rich...

 

I should say that I think this is only possible with a standard turbo setup due to the linier boost curve, as a steady curve allows you to guesstamate load after a AFM Max out. Turbos with a steap boost curve are harder to predict.

 

My 2 cents :D

You should be on TV with talent like that - you're talking out of your arse.

There is no way in hell anyone could do what you propose. It is impossible to control how much fuel is required for the air that is being ingested without accurately measuring it - if you exceed the voltage ceiling for the AFM's, the tuner has no control over anything at and past that point.

As load increase, air ingestion does, so what happens if you tune like you propose and the guy is driving up a steep hill in 5th gear? There is no way in hell the fuel system could put enough fuel (especially in this case with injectors so close to their limit).

Infact, the Power FC is usually set to dump fuel when it detects the AFM voltage ceiling; just as it does when it detects what it believes to be knock (>= 60).

Mario.

[edit: spelling]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
  • Create New...