Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok,

So, if you really want your car to shoot a flame out (like a few feet) here is one way I've been told. I've also been told not to use it on the street, which I'll explain in a sec. I wouldn't do it myself.

As you are flooring the car getting ready for a shift, you set up your management to continue fueling as you push the clutch in (and back off for that second) as you go through the gears. It also retards the ignition which keeps the turbo on boost, and shooting raw feul out the back (which will catch fire if the exhaust is hot enough). Runs great, and heaps of fire (think v8 supercars). Cat, no cat, its doesn't matter, as long as you have a resonable sized pipe.

The downside is if you are driving down a hill, backed off, the car will still be feuling - which means the turbo will get HOT. Apparently even coasting down a hill for 30 secs or so can make a turbo glow red and fail.

Another system is to shoot a flamable gas (nos?) out the exhaust from near the diff, using a spark plug to ignite (ah lah Fast and Furious).

not that i'd bother...

That description doesn't just make a pop, its a rather big bang.

I don't think its harmful for a little pop every now and then, most skylines I know seem to have always done it....

You do not need to pump other gas into the pipe to create a flame, I've seen kits that work on a coil pack and a spark plug. They simply spark in the exhaust tip and bang, you have flame. Don't forget boys and girls, those gassesfumes are flamable!

http://www.flamethrowers.com.au

Rice anyone? Ooooh yar, 2F2F....

cars with a cat wont... some cars cats might be badly degraded (if its been on there for a few years etc) so you might get a flame.

Mine flames on the odd occasion... i think. Whether it makes it out the rear end or not i dunno. No-one's ever seen it.

You can tell the difference between a pop and a flame.

The sound is a tad different between the usual pop, and when the fuel catches.

not ture, i have a cat and i get flames (view the sauwa/silviawa cruise video) unless my abuses over the years has eaten it up

Pre-86 cars :(

In NSW (and ACT, which uses the NSW rules), an engine conversion on a car built from 1972 onwards has to meet the emmissions requirements of the year the engine was built in. Cars built prior to 1972 only have to meet the emmissions of when the car was built.

So - if you were to take a 1985 car and put an RB engine in it, you would have to run an exhaust choke... sorry, "catalytic convertor". I think it was the CEO of Lukey mufflers who commented that the best flowing catalytic convertors flowed almost as well as the worst flowing mufflers...

In my case, I can run aftermarket injection, play with cams, turbo etc. etc., and as long as I meet the CO/HC limits for 1971, I don't have to worry about the EPA.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @robbo_rb180 I already have a NEO head on the shitbox 😎 Just needs beehive springs so I can rev it past the 8600 rpm limiter, then again pointless too, turbo is out of puff lol. Wen da gods let me win lotto eh?
    • Everyone I know with a90 supra at time attack aren't having issues with 3-5 fast laps so far and one is decent powered one too. Saw a k24 swapped 86 with a 8hp70 and big slicks and aero which had no drama's at QR and Manton Park. I've stuck a 25 row cooler in my setup with 8hp45/50 in the hopes of keeping the oil cool as I plan on some racing next year that 20-30min sessions. I've also geared my car so won't be using 7th and 8th gear too. @Dose Pipe Sutututu just needs to get that samsonas in already and have that tassie guy fit a head and rev it too 11ty thousand rpm. 
    • My embedded systems thoughts have me sitting with GTS on this. Variation between same phone hardware, should be small. However, the internal "intensity" or "volume" amount that say Google passes to the app, will be quite different, as the underlying hardware will be passing different levels for the same volume to the Google OS. Until the app creator has had each individual phone, and set benchmarks and calibrations for each, the amount of error can be quite huge.   It can even be observed by using different phones, recording the same noise, and then playing it back, they end up soon ding different. A big reason for it, is even the different types of mics used in phones have different responses, and different frequency ranges. Then you need to get into the DSP, and the variations in those, their sample rates which then effect their frequency range, and then the quality of the DSP, and what type of hardware conversion they do to for the ADC within the DSP. Oh, and let's not forget at the low level phones are designed to cutout loud sounds. It's one of the reasons they suck in really loud environments (eg concerts). The louder you yell, the more you'll get cutout too Note DSP is Digital Signal Processor ADC is the analogue to data converter. I don't have any real data on what the variation would truly be, however, chat GPT says in general, their output is typically between +/-2dB to +/-5dB of what you're really measuring. So realistically, anything from 4 to 10dB variation is possible even with the same devices.
    • 'sif the error will be that low!
    • I do know where there is a fair few 😉
×
×
  • Create New...