Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Exhaust filter this has been proved from 2 users called Merli and kabab in the year 1800 before everyone in the universe had a Skyline.

RIP the good old days.

:(

The result was 14.0 sec v 14.1 sec, advantage R32. Mods were like, exhaust/filter. Correct me if I'm wrong either of you.

I've got my money on the R32 (go the 20), until you get past that stage.... then cubes > 20

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1203938
Share on other sites

I've recently got my R32 (stock as a rock at the moment), and it feels slower than any R33 I have ever been in. Not that I've been in too many "totally" stock R33 though.

My Passage has a silvertop RB20DET and RB20 box and pulls pretty nicely though.. only real difference seems to the 3" exhaust, pod and 10psi..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1203943
Share on other sites

I've recently got my R32 (stock as a rock at the moment), and it feels slower than any R33 I have ever been in. Not that I've been in too many "totally" stock R33 though.  

My Passage has a silvertop RB20DET and RB20 box and pulls pretty nicely though.. only real difference seems to the 3" exhaust, pod and 10psi..

And you also have an 89 model. A 92-93 type m would be a fair bit better/faster i imagine. i know the ecu is different at the least...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1204505
Share on other sites

i got my R33(totally stock cept for the body) like 2 weeks ago and i already want to change it for an R32.

Not because the R33 is slow. in fact, i quite enjoy driving it, but i just love the R32 shape.

yeh the r33 is the only boat that you cant fit you fishing rods in :wassup: :wassup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1204546
Share on other sites

R33 is faster by far. As someone who has owned a pretty good example of a R32 GTS-T as good a car as it is the RB25DET IMHO is the better engine.

Mod to mod the little RB20DET can't compete. There is a weight difference but the engine more than makes up for it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1204552
Share on other sites

Stock for Stock hmmm lets see.

I have a few friends with skylines, some have r32s some r33s some sedans some coupes.

Now we have had lots of races between them all. and these are the results. (keeping in mind the results were done when all the cars were completely stock appart from my car which the engine was stock but was converted to manual - r33 sedan).

These were measured on a airstrip so it was 0-180kmph. All the cars that were involved were manuals.

r32 coupe vs r33 coupe = r33 coupe was quicker

r32 sedan vs r33 sedan = r33 sedan was quicker

r32 coupe vs r33 sedan = Photo finish - very very close

r32 sedan vs r33 coupe = r33 coupe was quicker by far

anyone can dispute any of these results but these are just what we found out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1204598
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
    • yeah, there's a country that recently started importing Skylines, I blame them.
×
×
  • Create New...