Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sydney kid is correct... I will confirm

All R33's i have seen and to my knowledge are al VVT

As for the coil packs the only difference inbetween the S1 and S2 is the ignighter pack.

My personal understanding is that the R33 25 motor has a signal from the cam mag to the reciever pictured above which switches the ECU to VVT stage. But i dont believe it cuts out at any rev range... It works from 3200 rpm right threw to red line.

The Neo R34 can adjust due to load... any where inbetween 0 and 17 degres (if i remember corectlly). I covered this module at Tafe and we used the skyline neo as a test engine. But that was 5 years ago....

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sydneykid, i'm not calling you a liar, but i'm pretty sure the R33 NVCS is OFF from 0 - 1050rpm, then ON until 4500rpm, then OFF again until redline. This is how it is setup on my RB30DET and I've noticed a distinct lack in power up to 4500rpm when the NVCS plug falls off the solenoid! (due to lost metal retaining clip).

i heard similar as well, the other "sydneykid"(someone else who knows a lot)

told me it was from 1050rpm - 5200rpm

....My personal understanding is that the R33 25 motor has a signal from the cam mag to the reciever pictured above which switches the ECU to VVT stage. But i dont believe it cuts out at any rev range... It works from 3200 rpm right threw to red line.......

Wrong!!! The ECU uses the CAS signal (RPM) and load to determine when the NVCS solenoid switches ON. If the engine is at light load, irrespective of RPM, the solenoid stays OFF, improving economy and emissions. If the engine is under load (dunno what the trigger point is) AND it is between 1050 and 4500 rpm, solenoid switches ON, advances the inlet cam 20 degs, giving more overlap and stronger midrange performance.

That is a solenoid, not a reciever, circled above. It controls the flow of oil to the cam advance mechanism.

Let's kill 2 birds with stone stone here. I have the Datalogit plugged into an R33 RB25DET and on screen "Settings 1" it has the VCT set at 4,700 rpm. I have not changed it on this engine, so that is the default RPM as selected by Apexi. It doesn't have different "on" or "off", or "in between" or "load" or any other selection. Just RPM and just ONE RPM, so it turns on at 4,700 rpm on the way up and off at 4,700 rpm on the way down. That's it, no more complicated than that.

So tango, yes the PFC does have VCT control and it is adjustable, ie; pick an RPM.

How do I pick an RPM?

Well I do a power run with the VCT off until 8,000 rpm (ie; past the rev limit, so it never turns on). I graph that.

Then I do a power run with the VCT on at 800 rpm (ie; at idle, so it is on all the time). I graph that.

Then I overlay the 2 graphs, where the power curves cross is the best VCT change over point. Nissan's 4,700 rpm is pretty close every time, regardless of the engine mods. So it appears to me to be rpm dependant ie, the speed of combustion cycle. Load, throttle opening, power etc all seem to be irrelevant in a simple "on" or "off" scenario.

BTW, the power curves only ever cross at one point, so it makes no sense to have multiple "on's" and "off's"

In an R34GTT, with its more sophisticated VCT control via the more powerful and faster ECU, there are obviously other parameters taken into account. Logically to allow appropriate selection of the amount of inlet camshaft timing changes and the circumstances as to when they are required.

Hope that clarifies:cheers:

Guess i'll agree to disagree! Here are a few links....

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogu...haft-specs.html

http://www.max-boost.co.uk/max-boost/cylhead/cams.htm - read "under construction" section at the bottom of the page.

http://www.v6performance.net/forums/showth...?t=15976&page=1 - not an RB25 but operation is identical, just different switch points.

As i said MonstaS4 it was "my understanding" i was not sure....

This system is very different to Toyotas system... Although i didnt remember the topic from Tafe. I did work with the RB25 motor, but that was long ago. Ill try and retrieve my notes from Tafe and get you an exact answer. As we compaired Nissan with Toyota.

Guess i'll agree to disagree! Here are a few links....

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogu...haft-specs.html

http://www.max-boost.co.uk/max-boost/cylhead/cams.htm - read "under construction" section at the bottom of the page.

http://www.v6performance.net/forums/showth...?t=15976&page=1 - not an RB25 but operation is identical, just different switch points.

Let's start with the Tomei spes, what Tomei are recommending to me is to set the VCT switch point at 4,500 rpm on the ECR33 RB25DET using their camshafts. There is always a no switching point at low rpm as zero overlap is best for emmissions. That's is usually just above idle, but it isn't adjustable, well not on any PFC or chipped std computer I have seen. There is also the question of sufficicent oil pressure at idle (to rotate the camshaft), so switching is best left till above the fastest idle rpm. So Tomei say 1050 which should be above the a/c or other load compensation (fast) idle point.

OK max boost, they confirm two timing positons 0 and 20 degrees only. They say 1500 rpm for the lower limit, it may be a typo (1050 rpm). Or they are simply wrong. Either way a 1500 rpm lower limit wouild have it switching on/off/on/off at strange times for no good reason. They indicate 4,200 rpm as the switching point.

Lastly V6 performance, they indicate (on the graph) a single switch over point at ~4,900 rpm on the VE30DE from the 92-94 Maxima SE. But the words directly below say 6,100 rpm, so I assume that must be for the VG30DETT. Bit confusing. Note that the graph starts at 1200 rpm, just enough above fast idle with the VCT already switched.

Bottom line, I don't think we dissagree at all. The only issue I can see is the use of the words "on" and "off". Most people say "4500 rpm switch "on" vct". Whereas the more corrrect terminology would in fact be "4,500 rpm switch "off" vct".

:cheers:

hmm confusing none the less.. but interesting discussion all the same.

so what your saying now sydneykid in basic terms is at the 4700rpm point, the ecu is allowing it to complete the circuit and switch the solinoid 'On' and 'advance the camshaft timing'???

Bottom line, I don't think we dissagree at all.  The only issue I can see is the use of the words "on" and "off".   Most people say "4500 rpm switch "on" vct".  Whereas the more corrrect terminology would in fact be "4,500 rpm switch "off" vct".

Spot on. That's what i was trying to say earlier. The solenoid switches on at 1500 or thereabouts (advancing the inlet cam 20deg), and off at 4500.

I've tried switching VCT on at idle via the Haltech and it is faily lumpy. There is a distict change in idle quality, so it does appear there is enough oil pressure to rotate the cam mechanism.

hmm still confused but i think i have got it now after studying what sydneykid said and MonstaS4's reply.

Sydneykid when you said you overlayed the two graphs with the vct off on one and on at idle on the other and marked the cross over point i am guessing this point is where it is turned off? my tuner is getting interested in it all and is pushing me along to get the engine running so he can play with it.

  • 3 years later...

so was there a final answer to this???

1. the advance is off at idle and turns on at 1050 rpm and then turns off at 4700 rpm (or whatever setting you have in datalogit)

2. the advance is off all the way up to 4700 rpm and then on from 4700 all the way up

to me option 2 makes more sense...but yeah whats the go?

SK have you tried any further experiments with changing this value from 4700???

original question: From what i know - R32 RB25 = No VCT/VVL (or whatever)

- R33 onwards RB25 = VCT/VVL

No VVL in a RB engine, just NVCS (VCT,VVT,VTC whatever)

so was there a final answer to this???

1. the advance is off at idle and turns on at 1050 rpm and then turns off at 4700 rpm (or whatever setting you have in datalogit)

2. the advance is off all the way up to 4700 rpm and then on from 4700 all the way up

to me option 2 makes more sense...but yeah whats the go?

SK have you tried any further experiments with changing this value from 4700???

NVCS is designed to increase mid range torque. There's really no sense in changing it...

No VVL in a RB engine, just NVCS (VCT,VVT,VTC whatever)

lol yeh theres to many names thrown around for it thats why i added the whatever in brackets

Ive been calling it VCT for a while now, In the power FC sensor chec it has a VTC dot that comes on, but VCT makes more sense so i just use that.

I didnt relise that in the R33's it just advanced everything 20 degrees from x to y in the rev range so this thread has taught me something interesting

  • 9 months later...

Whoa, i started this thread so long ago, i have since gained alot more knowledge about the ol skylines. lol but it seems i opned up a can of worms ha ha. hope this thread helped somebody out along the way.

P.S. (i now know about the coilpacks differences between series 1,2 etc. also timing belts, just for those of you who were wondering.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had absolutely no symptoms whatsoever that anything was wrong.... I'm very happy it was all spotto'd and re-bled and re-torqued and aligned though. Will be picking it up tomorrow and undoubtedly be like "Oh, that clunk is gone" "Oh, the car really wants to drive straight" "Oh, that pedal feels better" "Oh, it feels like I've gained 25hp" "Oh, the handbrake works now" It should have been a sign that the new Project Mu shoes had 3mm of pad depth on them out of the box, and the OEM ones from 25 years ago that we took out also had 3mm of pad depth, implying the issue was not, and never was the shoes, but we put that down to it not being adjusted correctly. It wasn't, but it wasn't even adjustable at all given one side was boned and the T Junction of the cables was on a 45 degree angle, the non-working side being the one on the massive angle. Obviously when I had adjusted it and reset it and re-tensioned it I had either got it stuck or something along those lines. Oh well. Live and learn and absolutely could have been catastrophically worse so I'm rationalizing it as a win, kinda. I also got the chance to measure the distance between rear rim and the suspension arm/shocks and found a 30mm rubber block only just doesn't fit there. Which is great to know before ordering wheels, when I assumed 30mm was easy. The man with the Porsche adapters has rims that use 23.9mm of that space, so it's safe to assume I have between 23.9 and 29.9mm of space there to play with on the inside. The wheels looked pretty stupidly pokey with the 20mm spacers on the rear, only for me to find that the studs come out another 12mm and the wheel doesn't actually sit flush with the hub because you're supposed to cut your original studs. The wheels do have cutouts that kinda accomodate it, but not fully. So my 20mm spacer was anywhere between 25mm and 35mm. ~25mm and send it will determine on where the wheels sit with the spacers on. When I put the pads in for the track day I will mess around with spacers (with wheels that do not clear studs properly when mounted to spacers) and do more math, for the last time, for the 7th time.
    • Lucky pick up Best to find these things before something horrible happened to the yoke flange thingies I would hate to think what would happen if it dropped the tailshaft  Hopefully the holes are not flogged out in the yokes and it was just the bolts that got munted  As for the hand brake.....ouch, look like the disc got rather hot, and I assume smokey, I recall when I had a front caliper seize on the Commodore, there was lots of smoke and the disc was glowing cherry red when I was able to eventually stop and have a look, and stopping a big heavy car, going down a big hill with some rather high RPM down shifts and some hand brake action is something that makes you think hard about life
    • One of the things that never seemed right was the handbrake. Put in some nice new Project Mu shoes. We figured the rears were out, so why not. We're right there. My handbrake never worked well anyway. Well, this is them, 15km later. 67fdcf94-9763-4522-97a4-8f04b2ad0826.mp4 Keen eyes would note the difference in this picture too:   And this picture: Also, this was my Tailshaft bolts: 4ad3c7dd-51d0-4577-8e72-ba8bc82f6e87.mp4 It turns out my suspicions that one side of the handbrake cable was stretched all along were pretty accurate, as was my intuition that I didn't want to drop the tailshaft to swap them on jack stands and wasn't entirely sure about bolt torque. I have since bought the handbrake cables which have gone in. I'm very glad that I went to my mechanic friend who owns an alignment machine to get an alignment before the track day, because his eyes spotted these various levels of "WHAT THE f**k IS GOING ON HERE?". Turns out the alignment wasn't that bad, considering we changed the adjustable castor arms out for un-adjustable castor arms, and messed with the heights. Car drove pretty good with one side of the handbrake stuck on, unbleedable rear brakes, alignment screwy, and the tailshaft about to go flying and generally being a death trap waiting to happen! (I did have covid) (I maintain I adjusted the handbrake correctly, but movement caused shennanigans and/or I dislodged the spring on the problem side somewhat, or god knows what). G R E G G E D
    • Very interesting, im not sure how all those complications fit in to running a haltech instead of a stock ecu but I'm starting to think I'm a bit out of my league.
    • I just put 2 and 2 together. This is a Neo converted R32. The Neo ECU (in concert with the R34's AC controller) runs the AC quite differently to how the R32 ECU and AC controller do it. If you just drop it all in, it won't work. There is some tricky wiring required, including changing to the pressure switch that the Neo controllers want to see. I don't know what it is, because mine was done by a guru. It was a year or so after I did that transplant before he worked out what needed to be done.
×
×
  • Create New...