Jump to content
SAU Community

  

281 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

i havnt read all all the replys but...

heres my opinion...

i think it looks too much like an Inifnity G35 Coupe`... although they are basically the same car... so that might not make much sence...

in a way... i think that this V-35 model has kinda ruined the Skyline name... although it does kinda look alright and could grow on me... but yeah...

heres a few pics i found a loooooong time ago... of what a possible R/G/V-35 wouldve/couldve looked like... but as much as i know... its just some fan art... or somthin...

NissanSkylineGT-R35.jpg

greyr351.jpg

and of course the one that everyone would know of... the R-35 concept...

gtrr35concept_011.jpg

gtrr35concept_031.jpg

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

the first two were an artist impression created by blending a Tommy Kiara R34 bodykit with a Hyundai Tiburon.

The Artist did a good job then...looks great to me

Shimmy

There is no basically about it......The G35 Infinity IS a V35 but with LHD.

Thought the early concept in those last two pics looked terrible

Cheers

in my oppinion, it ISNT a skyline.... the skyline died for me on r34........

to me this is just another great nissan, seriously guys if nissan didnt say it was a skyline and said hey look we have a new car and gave it some new outrageous name everyone would be like aww looks so cool.... but since its WRECKING a legacy that we all hold dear.. it realy turns us against the car. The power figures of the car itself are impressive, and hey it DOES look good with a kit and rims..... the only thing they should of done is not relate this new car ANYWAY what so ever to a skyline.....

just my two cents..

to me this is just another great nissan, seriously guys if nissan didnt say it was a skyline and said hey look we have a new car and gave it some new outrageous name everyone would be like aww looks so cool.... .

Yeah good point. They were obviously banking on the Skyline name to sell more cars.

At least they didn't go and put Skyline badges on the Maxima

V35 350GT

I love it and would be proud to say it was 100% Skyline

WHAT!!! That's a skyline? I could have sworn that was an 350Z :rofl:

350z_skyline.jpg

Nissans design levels have sank to a level comparable of Holdan or Ford *EVERY F#CKING CAR LOOKS THE SAME* I'll photochop in a maxima next time...

WHAT!!! That's a skyline? I could have sworn that was an 350Z   :P

350z_skyline.jpg

Nissans design levels have sank to a level comparable of Holdan or Ford *EVERY F#CKING CAR LOOKS THE SAME*  I'll photochop in a maxima next time...

Let's play spot the difference.

I'll start...

...um...

Let's play spot the difference.

I'll start...

...um...

OK ;)

Length

Width

Height

Grill

Grill placement

Headlights

Taillights

Bonnet

Bumpers

Doors

door handle placement

Bootlid V's Hatch

Other than mechanically tell me which parts interchange that you can see

Sure they followed a theme but one that works

And for those who knock Carlos

Sure we don't like some of the things he's done but without him Nissan would have gone down the toilet by now their financial situation was so dire.

It's fine to build cars that push the forefront of technology such as the 32 GTR but that doesn't keep you in busness.

Better Nissan to survive and our cars maintain their resale value than go the way of Rover/MG.

Imagine those poor buggers trying to get out of their leases when they finish.

cheers

Length *No, Pfff Basically still the same

Width *No, Pfff Basically still the same

Height *No, Pfff Basically still the same

Grill *yes, I'll give you that.

Grill placement *No, your just reusing Grill to get to points & your not getting'em, Your still on 1 point.

Headlights *No, Pfff Basically still the same shape

Taillights *Yes, ok different.

Bonnet *No, Pfff Basically still the same

Bumpers *Pff

Doors *No, Pfff VERY similar

door handle placement *No, your trying to get 2 points again... not happening...

Bootlid V's Hatch *Ok, spose... but who cares about that.

So you end up with 3 points... Yep… REALLY different cars…;)

Sure they followed a theme  but one that works

And for those who knock Carlos

Sure we don't like some of the things he's done but without him Nissan would have gone down the toilet by now their financial situation was so dire.

Yes, but better to simply not make anther skyline if it's just going to be a Maxima / 350Z Hybrid anyway... At least not call it a skyline, there’s nothing skyline about it!!

Haha your'e funny :(

yeah like Nissan have never before had more than one model that looked practically the same as another model before and shared the same parts.

let me see

R30- 31 Skyline / Pintara

R32 Coupe / S13

R32 Sedan / Cefiro

180sx / 240 sx/ 280z

how far back do I have to go???

It is a fact that the Skyline really only started to look different from the other models with the R33 and R34 and possibly the R32 GTR not the GTS/T

All car manufacturers share similar design features between models and share parts and panels, this cuts down on the total cost of manufacture for indivedual cars.

Either way this poll has been running for quite awhile now and it seems that more people like or are willing to accept it than those that don't/won't. 103 to 37 so I guess that is the end of that.

It is always easier to jump on a negative band wagon than to accept new ideas.

Or maybe we should all go back to the designs of the 50's of big blocky cars with fins, I mean my grandfather thinks those cars are the best designs and everything newer is crap, so going by the same logic as the other people who like the older designs he must be right.

Oh well each to their own :bahaha:

It's only the internet and not everyone is going to agree on everything

Carry on

Yes you hit the nail on the head there Chris.

Some people are just slow to accept change and maintain their narrow viewpoints long after others have moved on.

I was one of the first to get an R33 then a R34 in spite of owners of the previous models telling me how ugly they are. Look how they accept them now.

Mind you even now if I see a nicely done up HR31 I wish I had the spare garage space :love:

Yes this thread has served it's purpose

Cheers

Chris

Haha your'e funny :)

   

yeah like Nissan have never before had more than one model that looked practically the same as another model before and shared the same parts.

   

  let me see

   

  R30- 31 Skyline / Pintara

   

  R32 Coupe / S13

   

  R32 Sedan / Cefiro

   

  180sx / 240 sx/ 280z

 

 how far back do I have to go???

   

Er, the Skyline/Pintara separation was just cynical marketing, much like the 350Z/Skyline issue now. At least Toyota doesn't call its' 4 Cylinder Camry a different car to its V6.

You're comparing a 180SX to a 240SX? They weren't even sold in the same market - they were different names for the same car (except engine) in different market.

If you think the R32 and the S13 and the Cefiro look the same that's up to you I guess.

For those of us who care, we are bitterly disappointed that not only has the styling become homogenised, but the engine is the same, and the chassis is the same, and the engine is the same! Rotating a door handle doesn't impress us, sorry. Very disappointing for flagship models of a manufacturer.

my view.... front looks shit ...way too much like a lexus, 350z or maxima. BAck looks alright though. I reckon the concept skyline, the black and silver one would have been a much better step in the right direction....(i love that car looks awesome !)

I didnt think the G35 Skyline could bring down the skyline visuals any more but it looks like the current 2007 GTR is even worse... so ugly... nothing compliments the other.... Looks like they've thrown on a r33 GTR wing & just expected that shape to suite, Those rims are a gay spoke pattern & It almost looks like that car wants liposuction too... ahhh man... the r34 ZTune is truly the Last GTR.

032911-E.jpg

:spew:

http://www.edmunds.com/future/2007/infinit...33/photos.html#

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Gotta admit, I love the 20b Cosmo.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...