Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.nismo.com.au/forsale_supra.htm

1995 TOYOTA SUPRA TWIN TURBO

* Silver Bodywork

* Automatic

* GFB Blow Off Valve

* Aftermarket Exhaust

* Electronic Front Spoiler

* Traction Control

* Lowered Suspension

* 128,000 Km's

$23, 990

---

That leaves you several thousand for those "wear and tear" issues.

believe u me its not ....thats what most people think it is but its not ...

its like when u get the exhaust with the butterfly in it for the r34 it has two modes sport and normal driving ...its actually not nismo either its a nissan sports exhaust as well.

LOL, 10 years old being old.  Most Skyline imports are around that age or older.

hence my car is 1999/2000 model dude

currently 4-5 yrs old, keeping it for another 3 yrs and it'll still be under 10

the 93 supra i was looking at would be approaching 12 yrs old

big difference

LOL, 10 years old being old.  Most Skyline imports are around that age or older.

thats why my car is a 1999/2000 model

currently only around 5 yrs old and after another 3 years, it'll still be under 10 yrs old

the 93/94 supra i was looking at back then would now be approaching 12 yrs old already, great car, definately better than the gtt in power but not what i was looking for due to age

like i said, if it was a 97+, then i'd wouldve definately went for it

thats why my car is a 1999/2000 model  

currently only around 5 yrs old and after another 3 years, it'll still be under 10 yrs old

the 93/94 supra i was looking at back then would now be approaching 12 yrs old already, great car, definately better than the gtt in power but not what i was looking for due to age

like i said, if it was a 97+, then i'd wouldve definately went for it

Hey I'm not bagging you (sorry if you thought that), it's just that a lot of people (me included) could not afford a R34 GTT so we go for the older cars.

N/A Supras are fast for what they are. Stock to stock, my S1 33 Gts-t is a little faster than my mates 96 n/a Supra which is damn good on behalf of the fact the Supra has no turbo.

If I had have had more money when I went car shopping, would have gone the TT Supra for sure though. Much more of a beast than 33's, 34's, and n/a Sup's.

i think it will never has an answer

most people will say GTR is better, include me

but a guy i know, who owned MANY cars (SL600, R32 GTR, TT supra, costworth, FD & more)

and all of them are mildly mod (bigger turbo)

he told me he love his supra most.

I would definately go a series 2 or 3 R33 GTR (96-97). You should be able to pick up a good clean example for approx 45 with a few mods and IMHO I think its a better option than the tt supra, especially if you decide to modify and enjoy the traction advantage that the GTR has.

Hi mate,

I was pretty much on the same boat when I changed my R33 GTR for a TT Supra about a year ago, but after listening to my mechanic of how great the Supra was so I had to get one to try out, and still loving it.

There is no comparison between the GTT or GTST to the TT Supra, as the sups is a far better built machine with lots of potential.

Dont get either mate. For thirty grand you have so many opions. But think about what you want and want it for. Performance , drifting , luxury etc and got from there. But for around 25G you can pick up a GTR probably a R32, but then your talking 4WS 4WD, Twin turbo or a monster m/f#@cker. But if you want performance dont go the N/A Supra big disappointment. Plus the Skyline doesnt stand out to police, whereas the supra does more.

supra looks beautiful stock, GT-T need a bit of facework. Personal choice really.

Another question, why would you get auto? they cost around the same.

Any second hand car you get will have problems, so you might as well throw the money at something with a manual gearbox.

Don't go N/A as its alot slower and still just as heavy.

30,000 Id get a 33gt-r or an RX7 series VII or VIII or maybe even a WRX

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, that was one of the things we learned fast in the past with our MX5. When you drive with the top down, you are effectively standing out in the sun, 100% of the time, and not getting in any shade (because roads aren't shaded generally!). Just like standing out in the middle of a field on a sunny 27C day is a bit of a bad plan, so is sitting in a MX5 without sun protection.
    • I also just ordered some Frankenstein bolts and side mounts to fit a hard top Just in case I do find one, basically so it doesn't need to be fixed to the car with only the front latch.......and then gaffa tape to keep it in place for the RTN journey from wherever I get it
    • If your temps are fine now, you probably won't have any issues with where your vents are as they don't look right up at the windscreens high pressure area, so any differences when giving it the beans for extended happy laps would be minimal, but, they should vent heaps when stuck in traffic  Much like how that reverse cowl on my SS let "visible" heat out when stationary, but, because it was basically at the windscreen my coolant temps on the Hwy actually raised because air was being fed into it at speed (110kph), to only come back down to around 90° when I got off the Hwy And your 100% correct about the NC currently not needing vents, but, if I was to add a turbo, and a oil cooler and intercooler in front of the condenserand radiator, and then take it to the track???? It is apparently a recommend requirement if I don't want to worry about coolant or oil temp issues, but, any of the above are possible scenarios, over time As it sits now, with the triple pass radiator and stock air conditioning system, I have absolutely no issues with either temps or air conditioning efficiency, I've been basically daily driving thie car for the last month, both on the Hwy, and peak hour, bumper to bumper traffic, but, that's pretty much expected from basically a standard engine  Talking about no issues daily driving, it was 39° the other day and I was sitting in bumper to bumper traffic on the M5 and then M7, with the top down, and with the air conditioning blowing nice cold air on my feet, balls, and face, well, there was one issue, my head and arms got pretty sun burnt Note to self: leave a hat and sunscreen in the car for such days 🤣
    • I would agree, unless you need something specific to the HV motor/battery side repaired or investigated, any mechanic will be able to perform normal services, but if you prefer, maybe look for a mechanic who regularly services/repairs Nissans, the VQ engines are pretty common in the Nissan lineup.  Sorry, I can't make any suggestions, I don't live in Vic.
    • Some of them keep working fine. 9 out of 10 of them end up causing an absolute misery bleeding the system and get thrown on the workshop floor in a tantrum and never thought about again because they were never really needed and just added crap to the car that we could have done without. Same-same with HICAS, A-LSD, and various other stupidities that over eager 10x engineers thought we had to have.
×
×
  • Create New...