Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I recently installed another Q45 TB and TPS. The PFC will now hunt for idle after warm up. Goes 800-1500 rpm surges. The standard ecu does not do this nor does it have a code. However the standard ecu does idle higher than before. What is the hunt an indication of? TPS volatge is ~0.60V at idle. Base timing was checked at 20.

Thank you.

I remember a while back when sorting some idle problems on my RB25/30 DET R33 with PFC, that at a certain very minute openning of the throttle, just passed closed, I could induce this same hunting condition repeatably. I also came to the conclusion that the idle control algorithm of the PFC was inferior to the standard ECU, but I managed to fix it eventually after much hair pulling.

What engine are you running ....RB25,26...I cant really see clearly from your avatar? The 26 has a throttle switch as well as a TPS, wheras the 25 only has the TPS. I assume you have the correct PFC for your engine? What AFM are you using? Have you removed the screens etc?

  • Like 1

Fiddle with the setting in the rev/idle screen.Write down what it has standard so you can always go back if need be.

Here are my settings even thou it's a RB20det

f/c - 1270

f/c - 910

idle - 870

idle - 800

I remember a while back when sorting some idle problems on my RB25/30 DET R33 with PFC, that at a certain very minute openning of the throttle, just passed closed, I could induce this same hunting condition repeatably. I also came to the conclusion that the idle control algorithm of the PFC was inferior to the standard ECU, but I managed to fix it eventually after much hair pulling.

What engine are you running ....RB25,26...I cant really see clearly from your avatar? The 26 has a throttle switch as well as a TPS, wheras the 25 only has the TPS. I assume you have the correct PFC for your engine? What AFM are you using? Have you removed the screens etc?

It's an rb25 with rb25 pfc. AFM is standard and untouched. I have a feeling the pfc just doesn't like the new tps. I have reset the pfc to no avail.

funny thing when setting the TPS i had a voltage of 1v at the sensor using a meter but the fc datalogit screen would show .65v. I have corrected the snsor voltage but no change.

the problem you are having sounds like a badly adjusted throtle position sensor, who did the install

also check your idle speed on your power fc if it is to high you will hit the idle limiter and it will also do the exact same thing you are explaining

  • 8 years later...

I remember a while back when sorting some idle problems on my RB25/30 DET R33 with PFC, that at a certain very minute openning of the throttle, just passed closed, I could induce this same hunting condition repeatably. I also came to the conclusion that the idle control algorithm of the PFC was inferior to the standard ECU, but I managed to fix it eventually after much hair pulling.

What engine are you running ....RB25,26...I cant really see clearly from your avatar? The 26 has a throttle switch as well as a TPS, wheras the 25 only has the TPS. I assume you have the correct PFC for your engine? What AFM are you using? Have you removed the screens etc?

How did you fix it, I installed a bigger turbo and type b tomei cams and I have a constant hunt at 900-850rpm under, so I have the idle higher to stop it but if not hunting runs rough on idle. Tuner could not tune it out, replace afm and made it better but not fixed. Adjusted tps to correct position and base timing is 15deg

Edited by Jayden.K

Fix TPS, you may need to do a data init and do the idle re-learn, which shouldnt be a problem if you have datalogit.

As suggested above play with the idle settings, this is easier to do in FC-Edit as you can adjust them more then just on the unit itself

If you have a wideband (or even without one) try to richen the tune up around the idle cells. Easier with a wideband cause you can aim for around 14:1 AFR (they seem to idle a bit nicer around here) and play with the timing. Mine runs better at 20 degrees all around idle

Ok sounds like I need to hit my tuner up again for that idle learn. As he believed it was something else. I tried mucking around with the idle screw with the solenoid unplugged but made no difference. Cleaned my earths up and made no difference. Removed my idle screw and was fairly clean. I tune with a wide and bit run a narrow band. I have been thinking my fc is cactus. But I'll ask my tuner he is not one to skip corners

you dont need datalogit to do DATA INIT

but you will loose the tune, so if you don't have a copy or have it saved then yes get datalogit and back up the tune first

there is a procedure to follow when you do DATA INIT

and if you dont do it properly the idle is ass and sometimes results in instant-stall skyline

so read the pfc faq on DATA INIT at paulr33.com

if the TPS is wrong or off scale and isnt in the idle range then the if may tell the PFC the throttle is actually partially open, when it isnt

so as the others have said, dig up the nissan spec manual, find out the voltage range the TPS should be for idle and set yours to match that

the PFC will copy what the standard specs are so ensure it is aligned to that

ie if the spec manual says idle or closed should be 0.035 v then make sure yours is the same

It's an rb25 with rb25 pfc. AFM is standard and untouched. I have a feeling the pfc just doesn't like the new tps. I have reset the pfc to no avail.

funny thing when setting the TPS i had a voltage of 1v at the sensor using a meter but the fc datalogit screen would show .65v. I have corrected the snsor voltage but no change.

Wiring?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...