Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Possibly a silly question.

Considering I have a RB25 head with RB26 265 cams, solid lifters etc and all the manifolds, turbo etc that goes with it. Would it be conceivable to bolt it onto a RB26 bottom end if It could be bought at the right price (low km).

Would my current ECU still work with it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/65287-rb25-head-on-rb26-theory/
Share on other sites

i dont think it would be worth the money

rb30 bottom end would be better value to you for the $$$

or sell the gear your got and go complete rb26ett

How about if I said a $1000 RB26 bottom end that had 30000km on it. Considering my RB25 bottom end is starting to breath a little.

do you have a PFC?

Ok just to put things in perspective. The avatar is my motor. Head as described, 2835ProS, highflow exhaust manifold, Greddy plenum, Q45 throttle body, large sparco intercooler and all pipework to match, Z32 airflow, PFC (rb25), 3.5 inch exhaust from the turbo. 285rwkw. 550cc inj setup on current head.

Options:

1) Still have origonal head and all standard extras so if I remove my motor now I will have the full origonal stock motor as a defect motor.

2) 3L $5000-$10000 dollars. Plus loose some of my current pipework.

3) Build a 2.7L RB25 bottom end when mine goes.

4) RB26 Motor as sujested above. Need to buy all the turbos etc etc

5) RB26 Bottom end with my virtual RB26 head. Cheap option however is the bottom end any stronger than stock RB25 or should I say how long would it last running at say at a targeted 320rwkw.

rb26 is a strong bottom end then rb25 (but rb26 rods will fit your block and arnt that $$)

rb26 bottom will handle 320rwkw no worries , if looked after (mine currnretly 395rwkw)

a little breathing doesnt necessary mean the motors shagged

$1000 for rb26 bottom end sound pretty cheap just hope all is in good knick

In my opinion i would think you best course of action would be to buy a set of rb26 rods ~$300 and new forged pistons ~$1250 for your current configuration ,cos even if you put rb26 bottom end in, there no guarantee it is in good knick but do a rebuilt like this and you know its money well spent.

sounds like a nice ride

pete

rb26 is a strong bottom end then rb25 (but rb26 rods will fit your block and arnt that $$)

rb26 bottom will handle 320rwkw no worries , if looked after (mine currnretly 395rwkw)

a little breathing doesnt necessary mean the motors shagged

$1000 for rb26 bottom end sound pretty cheap just hope all is in good knick

In my opinion i would think you best course of action would be to buy a set of rb26 rods ~$300 and new forged pistons ~$1250 for your current configuration ,cos even if you put rb26 bottom end in, there no guarantee it is in good knick but do a rebuilt like this and you know its money well spent.  

sounds like a nice ride

pete

Supposedly had only done 30000km and in good nick. Yeah was considering your sujestion however would prefer going to the rB26 Crank as well in the rB25 bott end - starting to cost. However this way its all there. Just not sure if the head would mate up oK. Surely it would be a good buy just for the crank later on if nothing else.

Grepin,

If you were to go the RB25 head on the RB26 route you would have to modify the heads vct oil feed. Possibly weld.

You would then be required to tap in to the oil pressure sender oil feed then drill the head and tap in to the vct's oil galley in the head. Run the required hose and your done.

This is what they do for the RB30DET as essentially the bottom end (water/oil galleys are exactly the same as the rb26 bottom end)

Its a little bit of stuffing around but not to worry. :cheers:

Those cams would go nicely with a rb30 sitting under there.

The RB30's don't need high rev's so an rb30 making the same power as an rb25 will last a little longer.

The PFC issue is nothing to worry about.

My rb20det pfc runs the rb30det (which runs the rb25 head) no problems. The base map even runs it well.

The only small issue with the base map is the warm starts are hard to get going.

Grepin,

 

If you were to go the RB25 head on the RB26 route you would have to modify the heads vct oil feed. Possibly weld.

You would then be required to tap in to the oil pressure sender oil feed then drill the head and tap in to the vct's oil galley in the head. Run the required hose and your done.

 

This is what they do for the RB30DET as essentially the bottom end (water/oil galleys are exactly the same as the rb26 bottom end)

 

Its a little bit of stuffing around but not to worry. :cheers:

 

Those cams would go nicely with a rb30 sitting under there.

The RB30's don't need high rev's so an rb30 making the same power as an rb25 will last a little longer.

 

The PFC issue is nothing to worry about.

 

My rb20det pfc runs the rb30det (which runs the rb25 head) no problems. The base map even runs it well.

The only small issue with the base map is the warm starts are hard to get going.

The head has already had the VVt sealed up. Is that what you mean?

So being a RB26 I guess it can support more power, however I wonder if it would make more given the same boost etc as on the rB25 bottom end.

The larger motors do tend to make a little more power and at a lower rpm.

Its not much, 5-10rwkw more with everything being the same. Boost, timing etc.

You do notice a little difference with the rb30 vs the rb25 but I am unsure if you will notice a difference with a rb25 vs rb26.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Um. No. Since Matt introduced the TIM it has become a lot easier to deal with the consequences of changing K for AFM and injector swaps. Then, tuning is a f**king doddle. No-one needs to know or care how many grams of air are flowing or any other bullshit. Need more fuel in a cell? Add more fuel. Need more timing in a cell. Add more timing. Need to adjust any of the other tables for warm up and so on? No harder than anything else. Sure - it's not an ECU system for starting from scratch on an arbitrary engine. But then.....it was never supposed to be, not recommended for, and almost never used that way. So.... On your engine, in particular, Nistune/Nissan OEM is about as sophisticated and difficult as banging 2 rocks together. Those ECUs are primitive and simple. There is nothing difficult there. I learnt Nistune from scratch, created new maps with extended axes, interpolated/extrapolated the original maps onto them and tuned my RB20 (basically the same ECU as your 26 ECU) all by myself, more than 20 years ago. And that was long before even TIM.
    • Set of knee pads for a R34. Will fit every model I think. Comes with everything except the rubber covers for the bolt holes. Still in great condition. You will need to drill holes to mount these or use double sided tape. I can do free shipping and will be shipping from the Netherlands with tracking.
    • Nistune needs something like an entire excel spreadsheet in which you build an abstraction layer that converts everything from real units you can actually measure into all of the various tables. The number of unexpected dependencies hiding in how the Nissan ECUs do math is a pretty impressive optimization trick for 8-bit MCUs but good god is it awful to actually work with in practice. 
×
×
  • Create New...